- See Also
-
Links
- “Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY): Seeking Support for an Age-65 Follow Up and Ongoing Research”, Lubinski & David 2023
- “Professor Marcia Gentry Walked the Talk”, Assouline 2023
- “Wrecked by Success? Not to Worry”, Kell et al 2022
- “Identifying and Nurturing Future Innovators in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: A Review of Findings From the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth”, Benbow 2021
- “Social–Emotional Characteristics and Adjustment of Accelerated University Students: A Systematic Review”, Schuur et al 2020
- “In Search of Excellence: An Interview With Linda Brody”, Henshon 2020
- “Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?”, Lubinski & Benbow 2020b
- “Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35–Year Longitudinal Study”, Bernstein et al 2020
- “Does More Mean Less? Interest Surplus and the Gender Gap in STEM Careers”, Cardador et al 2020
- “Understanding Educational, Occupational, and Creative Outcomes Requires Assessing Intraindividual Differences in Abilities and Interests”, Lubinski 2020
- “Personality and School Functioning of Intellectually Gifted and Nongifted Adolescents: Self-perceptions and Parents' Assessments”, Wirthwein et al 2019
- “Who Shines Most among the Brightest?: A 25-year Longitudinal Study of Elite STEM Graduate Students”, McCabe et al 2019
- “Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later”, Bernstein et al 2019
- “Right-Tail Range Restriction: A Lurking Threat to Detecting Associations between Traits and Skill among Experts”, Kell & Wai 2019
- “Gifted Students”, Worrell et al 2019
- “SMPY Bibliography”, Gwern 2018
- “Individual Differences at the Top: Mapping the Outer Envelope of Intelligence”, Lubinski 2018
- “Functional Consequences of Genetic Loci Associated With Intelligence in a Meta-analysis of 87,740 Individuals”, Coleman et al 2017
- “Gifted Kids and High-Achievers Stay Fresh: Health Outcomes of Four SMPY Cohorts at Age 50”, Kell et al 2017
- “A Genome-wide Association Study for Extremely High Intelligence”, Zabaneh et al 2017
- “Developing Talents: A Longitudinal Examination of Intellectual Ability and Academic Achievement”, McCoach et al 2017
- “What Innovations Have We Already Lost?: The Importance of Identifying and Developing Spatial Talent”, Wai & Kell 2017
- “When Lightning Strikes Twice”, Makel et al 2016
- “Genius Revisited Revisited”, Gwern 2016
- “From Terman to Today”
- “Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later [Gelman Commentary]”, Gelman 2014
- “Experts Are Born, Then Made: Combining Prospective and Retrospective Longitudinal Data Shows That Cognitive Ability Matters”, Wai 2014
- “Genetics of Intellectual and Personality Traits Associated With Creative Genius: Could Geniuses Be Cosmobian Dragon Kings?”, Johnson & Junior 2014
- “Expanding Talent Search Procedures by Including Measures of Spatial Ability: CTY’s Spatial Test Battery”, Stumpf et al 2013
- “Who Rises to the Top?: Early Indicators”, Kell et al 2013
- “Spatial Ability: A Neglected Talent in Educational and Occupational Settings”, Kell & Lubinski 2013c
- “History and Development of Above-Level Testing of the Gifted”, Warne 2012
- “The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature”, Tourón & Tourón 2011
- “_Human Intelligence_: Chapter 10, What Use Is Intelligence?”, Hunt 2011
- “A Theory Explaining Sex Differences in High Mathematical Ability Has Been around for Some Time”, Thomas 2010
- “Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Intellectually Talented Preadolescents: Their Nature, Effects, and Possible Causes”, Benbow 2010
- “CDP391442 346..351”
- “Spatial Ability and STEM: A Sleeping Giant for Talent Identification and Development”, Lubinski 2010
- “Talent Sleuth Extraordinaire: An Interview With Camilla P. Benbow”, Henshon & Benbow 2010
- “Cognitive Epidemiology: With Emphasis on Untangling Cognitive Ability and Socioeconomic Status”, Lubinski 2009
- “The Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model for Identifying and Developing Exceptional Mathematical and Verbal Abilities”, Brody 2009
- “Extending Sandra Scarr's Ideas about Development to the Longitudinal Study of Intellectually Precocious Youth”, Benbow & Lubinski 2009
- “Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance”, Wai et al 2009
- “10519_2009_9273_39_4-web 350..358”
- “Ability Differences Among People Who Have Commensurate Degrees Matter for Scientific Creativity”
- “12147_2007_9044_24_3-web 1..11”
- “A Great Man Standing With Terman and Hollingworth: Julian C. Stanley (1918-2005)”, Benbow 2005
- “The Duke University Talent Identification Program”, Putallaz et al 2005
- “Long-term Effects of Educational Acceleration”, Lubinski 2004b
- “Scholastic Assessment or g? The Relationship Between the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) and General Cognitive Ability”, Frey & Detterman 2004
- “2003 Award Winners: Edwin B. Newman Award”
- “The Progress and Problems of an Incredibly Talented Sister and Brother”, Moore 2002
- “Tending the Special Spark: Accelerated and Enriched Curricula for Highly Talented Art Students”, Clark & Zimmerman 2002
- “A Genome-Wide Scan of 1842 DNA Markers for Allelic Associations With General Cognitive Ability: A Five-Stage Design Using DNA Pooling and Extreme Selected Groups”, Plomin et al 2001
- “Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-year Longitudinal Study”, Shea et al 2001
- “PSI—Vol 11#6”
- “Using Talent Searches to Identify and Meet the Educational Needs of Mathematically Talented Youngsters”
- “Relationship between Levels of Giftedness and Psychosocial Adjustment”, Norman et al 1999
- “A Quantitative Trait Locus Associated With Cognitive Ability in Children”, Chorney et al 1998
- “Varieties of Intellectual Talent”
- “Citation: David Lubinski”
- “My Education”, Plotinck 1996
- “Entering a Women's College Two Years Early”, Cargain 1996
- “Educational Trajectories: Radical Accelerates Provide Insights”, Stanley & Eh.D. 1996b
- “Optimal Development Of Talent: Respond Educationally To Individual Differences In Personality”, Lubinski & Benbow 1995b
- “Competence and Responsibility: The Third European Conference of The European Council for High Ability Held in Munich (Germany), October 11–14, 1992; Volume 2: Proceedings of the Conference”, A. et al 1994
- “Beyond Terman: Contemporary Longitudinal Studies of Giftedness and Talent”, Subotnik & Arnold 1994
- “Follow-up Insights on Rapid Educational Acceleration”, Charlton et al 1994
- “Programs for Mathematically Gifted Students: A Review of Empirical Research”, Sowell 1993
- “The Origins and Development of High Ability”, Bock et al 1993
- “Psychological Profiles of the Mathematically Talented: Some Sex Differences and Evidence Supporting Their Biological Basis”, Benbow & Lubinski 1993
- “Consequences of Gender Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Some Biological Linkages”, Benbow & Lubinski 1993b
- “The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way Along”, Alper 1993
- “Selected Results of the Munich Longitudinal Study of Giftedness: The Multidimensional/typological Giftedness Model”, Perleth et al 1993
- “A Decade of Longitudinal Research On Academic Acceleration Through the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth”, Swiatek 1993
- “Personality, Learning Style And Cognitive Style Profiles Of Mathematically Talented Students”, Mills 1993
- “A Slice of Advice”
- “An Interview With Julian C. Stanley”, Kirschenbaum 1992
- “Tribute to Halbert B. Robinson (1925-1981)”, Stanley 1991c
- “Educational Productivity Predictors Among Mathematically Talented Students”, Benbow et al 1991
- “A 10-Year Longitudinal Follow-up of Participants in a Fast-Paced Mathematics Course”
- “Eight Considerations for Mathematically Talented Youth”, Stanley et al 1990
- “Applying: A Mentor Model: For Young Mathematically Talented Students”, Lupkowski et al 1990
- “Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A Pilgrim in Research in Her Time and Ours”, Benbow 1990
- “Leta Hollingworth’s Contributions to Above-level Testing of the Gifted”, Stanley 1990b
- “Most Fare Better”, Stanley 1989c
- “On Being a Misfit”, Lindblad 1989
- “Media Review: Books: Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model”, Wood & Bransky 1987
- “Extreme Mathematical Talent: A Hormonally Induced Ability?”, Benbow & Benbow 1987b
- “Note About Possible Bias Resulting When Under-Statisticized Studies Are Excluded from Meta-Analyses”, Stanley 1987c
- “State Residential High Schools for Mathematically Talented Youth”
- “Identification and Fostering of Mathematically Gifted Students”
- “SAT-M Scores of Highly Selected Students in Shanghai Tested When Less Than 13 Years Old”, Stanley et al 1986b
- “Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented”, Renzulli 1986
- “Social and Emotional Adjustment of Adolescents Extremely Talented in Verbal or Mathematical Reasoning”
- “Chapter 1: SMPY's Model for Teaching Mathematically Precocious Students”, Benbow 1986b
- “A Baker's Dozen of Years Applying All 4 Aspects of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY)”, Stanley 1985b
- “Visual Thinking: The Art of Imagining Reality”, Root-Bernstein 1985
- “Early Instruction by the College: Johns Hopkins's Center for Talented Youth”
- “Terence Tao”, Clements 1984
- “The Exceptionally Talented”, Stanley 1984b
- “Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model”, Reynolds et al 1984
- “Spatial Ability and Testosterone”
- “Fast-Paced Classes: Challenging Gifted Students”, Tursman 1983
- “Opening Doors for the Gifted: A Flexible Curriculum Will Provide Valuable Learning Options for Gifted Students, according to Directors of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth at the Johns Hopkins University”, Benbow & Stanley 1983i
- “New Projects: Seeking Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically”, Stanley & Whitman 1983f
- “Duke University's Talent Identification Program”, Sawyer & Daggett 1982
- “The Joys and Challenges in Raising a Gifted Child”, Moore 1982
- “Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective”, Benbow & Stanley 1982b
- “One Small Step for the Mathematically Gifted”
- “Development of Superior Mathematical Ability During Adolescence”, Benbow 1981
- “Exceptionally Gifted Boys and Their Parents”, Albert 1980
- “German for Verbally Gifted Youngsters at Hopkins: The First Year”, McClain & Durden 1980
- “Manipulate Important Educational Variables”, Stanley 1980b
- “The Talent-Search Concept: an Identification Strategy for the Intellectually Gifted”, George 1979
- “The Future of Education”, Stanley & George 1979
- “The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth”, George & Stanley 1979b
- “Early Entrance to College: The Johns Hopkins Experience; Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), The Johns Hopkins University”, Eisenberg & George 1979
- “The Johns Hopkins Program for Verbally Gifted Youth”, Durden 1979
- “Searching for Scientifically Talented Youth?”, Cohn 1979c
- “Now We Are Six: The Ever-Expanding SMPY”, Stanley & George 1978
- “Educational Programs and Intellectual Prodigies”, Stanley et al 1978
- “Is Sex Role Related To Intellectual Abilities?”, Mills 1978
- “Cognitive Characteristics of the Top-Scoring Third of the 1976 Talent Search Contestants”, Cohn 1978
- “Radical Acceleration: Recent Educational Innovation At JHU”, Stanley 1978c
- “Books Tell The SMPY Story”, Stanley et al 1977b
- “Parental Support—Time and Energ”, George 1977
- “Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically: Smpy's Accelerative Approach”, Stanley 1976
- “Concern for Intellectually Talented Youths: How It Originated and Fluctuated”, Stanley 1976c
- “College Courses and Educational Facilitation of the Gifted”, Solano & George 1976
- “My Introduction To Computing”, Smith 1976
- “Merrill Kenneth Wolf: a Bachelor's Degree At 14”, Montour 1976
- “Accelerating Mathematics Instruction for the Mathematically Talented”, George 1976
- “Individualizing Science Curricula for the Gifted”, Cohn 1976
- “Rationale of Smpy During Its First 7 Years of Promoting Educational Acceleration”, Stanley 1976b
- “Teacher and Pupil Stereotypes of Gifted Boys and Girls”, Solano 1975b
- “Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science”, Keating & Stanley 1972
- “Creativity in Science through Visualization”, Walkup 1965
- “Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance”, Smith 1964
- “Scientific Careers and Vocational Development Theory: A Review, a Critique and Some Recommendations”, Super & Bachrach 1957
- “On the Adequacy of Standardized Tests Administered to Extreme Norm Groups”, Stanley 1951
- “The 62-Year-Old Child Genius: In 1969, a Very Smart 13 Year-old Began His Undergraduate College Education—a Move That Would Come to Influence How We Think about Gifted Children for the next Four Decades.”
- “Thinking Positively: The Genetics of High Intelligence”
- Sort By Magic
- Wikipedia
- Miscellaneous
- Link Bibliography
See Also
Links
“Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY): Seeking Support for an Age-65 Follow Up and Ongoing Research”, Lubinski & David 2023
“Professor Marcia Gentry Walked the Talk”, Assouline 2023
“Wrecked by Success? Not to Worry”, Kell et al 2022
“Identifying and Nurturing Future Innovators in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: A Review of Findings From the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth”, Benbow 2021
“Social–Emotional Characteristics and Adjustment of Accelerated University Students: A Systematic Review”, Schuur et al 2020
“In Search of Excellence: An Interview With Linda Brody”, Henshon 2020
“Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?”, Lubinski & Benbow 2020b
“Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?”
“Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35–Year Longitudinal Study”, Bernstein et al 2020
“Does More Mean Less? Interest Surplus and the Gender Gap in STEM Careers”, Cardador et al 2020
“Does More Mean Less? Interest Surplus and the Gender Gap in STEM Careers”
“Understanding Educational, Occupational, and Creative Outcomes Requires Assessing Intraindividual Differences in Abilities and Interests”, Lubinski 2020
“Personality and School Functioning of Intellectually Gifted and Nongifted Adolescents: Self-perceptions and Parents' Assessments”, Wirthwein et al 2019
“Who Shines Most among the Brightest?: A 25-year Longitudinal Study of Elite STEM Graduate Students”, McCabe et al 2019
“Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students”
“Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later”, Bernstein et al 2019
“Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later”
“Right-Tail Range Restriction: A Lurking Threat to Detecting Associations between Traits and Skill among Experts”, Kell & Wai 2019
“Gifted Students”, Worrell et al 2019
“SMPY Bibliography”, Gwern 2018
“Individual Differences at the Top: Mapping the Outer Envelope of Intelligence”, Lubinski 2018
“Individual Differences at the Top: Mapping the Outer Envelope of Intelligence”
“Functional Consequences of Genetic Loci Associated With Intelligence in a Meta-analysis of 87,740 Individuals”, Coleman et al 2017
“Gifted Kids and High-Achievers Stay Fresh: Health Outcomes of Four SMPY Cohorts at Age 50”, Kell et al 2017
“Gifted Kids and High-Achievers Stay Fresh: Health Outcomes of Four SMPY Cohorts at Age 50”
“A Genome-wide Association Study for Extremely High Intelligence”, Zabaneh et al 2017
“A genome-wide association study for extremely high intelligence”
“Developing Talents: A Longitudinal Examination of Intellectual Ability and Academic Achievement”, McCoach et al 2017
“Developing talents: A longitudinal examination of intellectual ability and academic achievement”
“What Innovations Have We Already Lost?: The Importance of Identifying and Developing Spatial Talent”, Wai & Kell 2017
“When Lightning Strikes Twice”, Makel et al 2016
“Genius Revisited Revisited”, Gwern 2016
“From Terman to Today”
“Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later [Gelman Commentary]”, Gelman 2014
“Experts Are Born, Then Made: Combining Prospective and Retrospective Longitudinal Data Shows That Cognitive Ability Matters”, Wai 2014
“Genetics of Intellectual and Personality Traits Associated With Creative Genius: Could Geniuses Be Cosmobian Dragon Kings?”, Johnson & Junior 2014
“Expanding Talent Search Procedures by Including Measures of Spatial Ability: CTY’s Spatial Test Battery”, Stumpf et al 2013
“Who Rises to the Top?: Early Indicators”, Kell et al 2013
“Spatial Ability: A Neglected Talent in Educational and Occupational Settings”, Kell & Lubinski 2013c
“Spatial Ability: A Neglected Talent in Educational and Occupational Settings”
“History and Development of Above-Level Testing of the Gifted”, Warne 2012
“History and Development of Above-Level Testing of the Gifted”
“The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature”, Tourón & Tourón 2011
“The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature”
“_Human Intelligence_: Chapter 10, What Use Is Intelligence?”, Hunt 2011
“_Human Intelligence_: chapter 10, What Use Is Intelligence?”
“A Theory Explaining Sex Differences in High Mathematical Ability Has Been around for Some Time”, Thomas 2010
“A theory explaining sex differences in high mathematical ability has been around for some time”
“Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Intellectually Talented Preadolescents: Their Nature, Effects, and Possible Causes”, Benbow 2010
“CDP391442 346..351”
“Spatial Ability and STEM: A Sleeping Giant for Talent Identification and Development”, Lubinski 2010
“Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development”
“Talent Sleuth Extraordinaire: An Interview With Camilla P. Benbow”, Henshon & Benbow 2010
“Talent Sleuth Extraordinaire: An Interview With Camilla P. Benbow”
“Cognitive Epidemiology: With Emphasis on Untangling Cognitive Ability and Socioeconomic Status”, Lubinski 2009
“Cognitive epidemiology: With emphasis on untangling cognitive ability and socioeconomic status”
“The Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model for Identifying and Developing Exceptional Mathematical and Verbal Abilities”, Brody 2009
“Extending Sandra Scarr's Ideas about Development to the Longitudinal Study of Intellectually Precocious Youth”, Benbow & Lubinski 2009
“Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance”, Wai et al 2009
“10519_2009_9273_39_4-web 350..358”
“Ability Differences Among People Who Have Commensurate Degrees Matter for Scientific Creativity”
“Ability Differences Among People Who Have Commensurate Degrees Matter for Scientific Creativity”
“12147_2007_9044_24_3-web 1..11”
“A Great Man Standing With Terman and Hollingworth: Julian C. Stanley (1918-2005)”, Benbow 2005
“A Great Man Standing With Terman and Hollingworth: Julian C. Stanley (1918-2005)”
“The Duke University Talent Identification Program”, Putallaz et al 2005
“Long-term Effects of Educational Acceleration”, Lubinski 2004b
“Scholastic Assessment or g? The Relationship Between the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) and General Cognitive Ability”, Frey & Detterman 2004
“2003 Award Winners: Edwin B. Newman Award”
“The Progress and Problems of an Incredibly Talented Sister and Brother”, Moore 2002
“The progress and problems of an incredibly talented sister and brother”
“Tending the Special Spark: Accelerated and Enriched Curricula for Highly Talented Art Students”, Clark & Zimmerman 2002
“Tending the special spark: Accelerated and enriched curricula for highly talented art students”
“A Genome-Wide Scan of 1842 DNA Markers for Allelic Associations With General Cognitive Ability: A Five-Stage Design Using DNA Pooling and Extreme Selected Groups”, Plomin et al 2001
“Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-year Longitudinal Study”, Shea et al 2001
“PSI—Vol 11#6”
“Using Talent Searches to Identify and Meet the Educational Needs of Mathematically Talented Youngsters”
“Relationship between Levels of Giftedness and Psychosocial Adjustment”, Norman et al 1999
“Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment”
“A Quantitative Trait Locus Associated With Cognitive Ability in Children”, Chorney et al 1998
“A Quantitative Trait Locus Associated With Cognitive Ability in Children”
“Varieties of Intellectual Talent”
“Citation: David Lubinski”
“My Education”, Plotinck 1996
“Entering a Women's College Two Years Early”, Cargain 1996
“Educational Trajectories: Radical Accelerates Provide Insights”, Stanley & Eh.D. 1996b
“Educational Trajectories: Radical Accelerates Provide Insights”
“Optimal Development Of Talent: Respond Educationally To Individual Differences In Personality”, Lubinski & Benbow 1995b
“Optimal Development Of Talent: Respond Educationally To Individual Differences In Personality”
“Competence and Responsibility: The Third European Conference of The European Council for High Ability Held in Munich (Germany), October 11–14, 1992; Volume 2: Proceedings of the Conference”, A. et al 1994
“Beyond Terman: Contemporary Longitudinal Studies of Giftedness and Talent”, Subotnik & Arnold 1994
“Beyond Terman: contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent”
“Follow-up Insights on Rapid Educational Acceleration”, Charlton et al 1994
“Programs for Mathematically Gifted Students: A Review of Empirical Research”, Sowell 1993
“Programs for Mathematically Gifted Students: A Review of Empirical Research”
“The Origins and Development of High Ability”, Bock et al 1993
“Psychological Profiles of the Mathematically Talented: Some Sex Differences and Evidence Supporting Their Biological Basis”, Benbow & Lubinski 1993
“Consequences of Gender Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Some Biological Linkages”, Benbow & Lubinski 1993b
“Consequences of Gender Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Some Biological Linkages”
“The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way Along”, Alper 1993
“Selected Results of the Munich Longitudinal Study of Giftedness: The Multidimensional/typological Giftedness Model”, Perleth et al 1993
“A Decade of Longitudinal Research On Academic Acceleration Through the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth”, Swiatek 1993
“Personality, Learning Style And Cognitive Style Profiles Of Mathematically Talented Students”, Mills 1993
“Personality, Learning Style And Cognitive Style Profiles Of Mathematically Talented Students”
“A Slice of Advice”
“An Interview With Julian C. Stanley”, Kirschenbaum 1992
“Tribute to Halbert B. Robinson (1925-1981)”, Stanley 1991c
“Educational Productivity Predictors Among Mathematically Talented Students”, Benbow et al 1991
“Educational Productivity Predictors Among Mathematically Talented Students”
“A 10-Year Longitudinal Follow-up of Participants in a Fast-Paced Mathematics Course”
“A 10-Year Longitudinal Follow-up of Participants in a Fast-Paced Mathematics Course”
“Eight Considerations for Mathematically Talented Youth”, Stanley et al 1990
“Applying: A Mentor Model: For Young Mathematically Talented Students”, Lupkowski et al 1990
“Applying: A Mentor Model: For Young Mathematically Talented Students”
“Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A Pilgrim in Research in Her Time and Ours”, Benbow 1990
“Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A pilgrim in research in her time and ours”
“Leta Hollingworth’s Contributions to Above-level Testing of the Gifted”, Stanley 1990b
“Leta Hollingworth’s contributions to above-level testing of the gifted”
“Most Fare Better”, Stanley 1989c
“On Being a Misfit”, Lindblad 1989
“Media Review: Books: Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model”, Wood & Bransky 1987
“Media Review: Books: Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model”
“Extreme Mathematical Talent: A Hormonally Induced Ability?”, Benbow & Benbow 1987b
“Extreme Mathematical Talent: A Hormonally Induced Ability?”
“Note About Possible Bias Resulting When Under-Statisticized Studies Are Excluded from Meta-Analyses”, Stanley 1987c
“State Residential High Schools for Mathematically Talented Youth”
“State Residential High Schools for Mathematically Talented Youth”
“Identification and Fostering of Mathematically Gifted Students”
“Identification and fostering of mathematically gifted students”
“SAT-M Scores of Highly Selected Students in Shanghai Tested When Less Than 13 Years Old”, Stanley et al 1986b
“SAT-M scores of highly selected students in Shanghai tested when less than 13 years old”
“Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented”, Renzulli 1986
“Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented”
“Social and Emotional Adjustment of Adolescents Extremely Talented in Verbal or Mathematical Reasoning”
“Chapter 1: SMPY's Model for Teaching Mathematically Precocious Students”, Benbow 1986b
“Chapter 1: SMPY's Model for Teaching Mathematically Precocious Students”
“A Baker's Dozen of Years Applying All 4 Aspects of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY)”, Stanley 1985b
“Visual Thinking: The Art of Imagining Reality”, Root-Bernstein 1985
“Early Instruction by the College: Johns Hopkins's Center for Talented Youth”
“Early instruction by the college: Johns Hopkins's center for talented youth”
“Terence Tao”, Clements 1984
“The Exceptionally Talented”, Stanley 1984b
“Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model”, Reynolds et al 1984
“Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model”
“Spatial Ability and Testosterone”
“Fast-Paced Classes: Challenging Gifted Students”, Tursman 1983
“Opening Doors for the Gifted: A Flexible Curriculum Will Provide Valuable Learning Options for Gifted Students, according to Directors of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth at the Johns Hopkins University”, Benbow & Stanley 1983i
“New Projects: Seeking Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically”, Stanley & Whitman 1983f
“New Projects: Seeking Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically”
“Duke University's Talent Identification Program”, Sawyer & Daggett 1982
“The Joys and Challenges in Raising a Gifted Child”, Moore 1982
“Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective”, Benbow & Stanley 1982b
“One Small Step for the Mathematically Gifted”
“Development of Superior Mathematical Ability During Adolescence”, Benbow 1981
“Development of Superior Mathematical Ability During Adolescence”
“Exceptionally Gifted Boys and Their Parents”, Albert 1980
“German for Verbally Gifted Youngsters at Hopkins: The First Year”, McClain & Durden 1980
“German for Verbally Gifted Youngsters at Hopkins: The First Year”
“Manipulate Important Educational Variables”, Stanley 1980b
“The Talent-Search Concept: an Identification Strategy for the Intellectually Gifted”, George 1979
“The Talent-Search Concept: an Identification Strategy for the Intellectually Gifted”
“The Future of Education”, Stanley & George 1979
“The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth”, George & Stanley 1979b
“Early Entrance to College: The Johns Hopkins Experience; Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), The Johns Hopkins University”, Eisenberg & George 1979
“The Johns Hopkins Program for Verbally Gifted Youth”, Durden 1979
“Searching for Scientifically Talented Youth?”, Cohn 1979c
“Now We Are Six: The Ever-Expanding SMPY”, Stanley & George 1978
“Educational Programs and Intellectual Prodigies”, Stanley et al 1978
“Is Sex Role Related To Intellectual Abilities?”, Mills 1978
“Cognitive Characteristics of the Top-Scoring Third of the 1976 Talent Search Contestants”, Cohn 1978
“Cognitive Characteristics of the Top-Scoring Third of the 1976 Talent Search Contestants”
“Radical Acceleration: Recent Educational Innovation At JHU”, Stanley 1978c
“Radical Acceleration: Recent Educational Innovation At JHU”
“Books Tell The SMPY Story”, Stanley et al 1977b
“Parental Support—Time and Energ”, George 1977
“Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically: Smpy's Accelerative Approach”, Stanley 1976
“Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically: Smpy's Accelerative Approach”
“Concern for Intellectually Talented Youths: How It Originated and Fluctuated”, Stanley 1976c
“Concern for intellectually talented youths: How it originated and fluctuated”
“College Courses and Educational Facilitation of the Gifted”, Solano & George 1976
“College Courses and Educational Facilitation of the Gifted”
“My Introduction To Computing”, Smith 1976
“Merrill Kenneth Wolf: a Bachelor's Degree At 14”, Montour 1976
“Accelerating Mathematics Instruction for the Mathematically Talented”, George 1976
“Accelerating Mathematics Instruction for the Mathematically Talented”
“Individualizing Science Curricula for the Gifted”, Cohn 1976
“Rationale of Smpy During Its First 7 Years of Promoting Educational Acceleration”, Stanley 1976b
“Rationale of Smpy During Its First 7 Years of Promoting Educational Acceleration”
“Teacher and Pupil Stereotypes of Gifted Boys and Girls”, Solano 1975b
“Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science”, Keating & Stanley 1972
“Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science”
“Creativity in Science through Visualization”, Walkup 1965
“Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance”, Smith 1964
“Scientific Careers and Vocational Development Theory: A Review, a Critique and Some Recommendations”, Super & Bachrach 1957
“On the Adequacy of Standardized Tests Administered to Extreme Norm Groups”, Stanley 1951
“On the adequacy of standardized tests administered to extreme norm groups”
“The 62-Year-Old Child Genius: In 1969, a Very Smart 13 Year-old Began His Undergraduate College Education—a Move That Would Come to Influence How We Think about Gifted Children for the next Four Decades.”
“Thinking Positively: The Genetics of High Intelligence”
Sort By Magic
Annotations sorted by machine learning into inferred 'tags'. This provides an alternative way to browse: instead of by date order, one can browse in topic order. The 'sorted' list has been automatically clustered into multiple sections & auto-labeled for easier browsing.
Beginning with the newest annotation, it uses the embedding of each annotation to attempt to create a list of nearest-neighbor annotations, creating a progression of topics. For more details, see the link.
intelligence
longitudinal
giftedness
Wikipedia
Miscellaneous
-
/doc/iq/high/smpy/2016-makel-table2-eliteaccomplishments.png -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/2016-makel-table2-creativeaccomplishments.png -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/2016-makel-figure1-tipsmpyiqscatterplot.png -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/2009-wai-figureb1-meanintelligencescoresbycollegemajorfield.png -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/2000-heller-internationalhandbookofgiftednessandtalent2ed.pdf -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/1997-colangelo-handbookofgiftededucation2ed.pdf -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/1996-benbow-intellectualtalentpsychometricandsocialissues.pdf -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/1993-heller-internationaldhandbookgiftednesstalent.pdf -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/1980-fox-womenandthemathematicalmystique.pdf -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/1976-keating-intellectualtalentresearchanddevelopment.pdf -
/doc/iq/high/smpy/1974-stanley-mathematicaltalentdiscoverydescriptiondevelopment.pdf -
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Intelligence-Earl-Hunt/dp/0521707811 -
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/03/the-math-revolution/426855/
Link Bibliography
-
2022-kell.pdf: “Wrecked by Success? Not to Worry”, Harrison J. Kell, Kira O. McCabe, David Lubinski, Camilla P. Benbow -
smpy: “SMPY Bibliography”, Gwern -
hunter: “Genius Revisited Revisited”, Gwern -
2009-wai.pdf: “Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance”, Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski, Camilla P. Benbow -
1993-mills.pdf: “Personality, Learning Style And Cognitive Style Profiles Of Mathematically Talented Students”, Carol J. Mills -
1990-benbow.pdf: “Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A Pilgrim in Research in Her Time and Ours”, Camilla Persson Benbow -
1984-clements.pdf: “Terence Tao”, M. A. Clements