- See Also
-
Links
- “Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Et Al 2022
- “Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, Et Al 2021
- “The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, 2021
- “Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies Said the United States Must Study Technologies That Would Artificially Cool the Planet by Reflecting Away Some Sunlight, Citing the Lack of Progress Fighting Global Warming.”, 2021
- “Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, 2021
- “Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, 2021
- “Viability of Greenhouse Gas Removal via Artificial Addition of Volcanic Ash to the Ocean”, Et Al 2020
- “Carbon Offsets Burning: A Major Fire in Oregon Illustrates the Challenges of Managing Forest Carbon Permanence”, Et Al 2020
- “Spreading Rock Dust on Fields Could Remove Vast Amounts of CO2 From Air: It May Be Best Near-term Way to Remove CO2, Say Scientists, but Cutting Fossil Fuel Use Remains Critical”, 2020
- “Pulling Carbon from the Sky Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Carbon Dioxide Removal Is Becoming a Serious Proposition. But It Is Not a Substitute for Aggressive Action to Cut Emissions”, 2020
- “Removal of Atmospheric CO2 By Rock Weathering Holds Promise for Mitigating Climate Change: Large-scale Removal of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Might Be Achieved through Enhanced Rock Weathering. It Now Seems That This Approach Is As Promising As Other Strategies, in Terms of Cost and CO2-removal Potential”, 2020
- “Potential for Large-scale CO2 Removal via Enhanced Rock Weathering With Croplands”, Et Al 2020
- “Climate-driven Risks to the Climate Mitigation Potential of Forests”, Et Al 2020
- “Negative Emissions—Part 2: Costs, Potentials and Side Effects”, Et Al 2020
- “We Need To Take CO2 Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO2⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, 2020
- “A Process for Capturing CO2 From the Atmosphere”, Et Al 2018
- “Negative Emissions—Part 3: Innovation and Upscaling”, Et Al 2018
- “Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis”, Et Al 2018
- Wikipedia
- Miscellaneous
- Link Bibliography
See Also
Links
“Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Et Al 2022
“Climate cooperation in the shadow of solar geoengineering: an experimental investigation of the moral hazard conjecture”, 2022-05-04 (similar; bibliography)
“Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, Et Al 2021
“Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, 2021-07-28 (backlinks; similar)
“The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, 2021
“The Bootleg fire is burning through trees that are being used as carbon offsets: One of the dangers of using trees as offsets is that they can suddenly and catastrophically release all their stored carbon”, 2021-07-28 (backlinks; similar; bibliography)
“Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies Said the United States Must Study Technologies That Would Artificially Cool the Planet by Reflecting Away Some Sunlight, Citing the Lack of Progress Fighting Global Warming.”, 2021
“Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies said the United States must study technologies that would artificially cool the planet by reflecting away some sunlight, citing the lack of progress fighting global warming.”, 2021-03-25 (similar)
“Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, 2021
“Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, 2021-03 (backlinks; similar)
“Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, 2021
“Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A surge of corporate money could soon transform carbon removal from science fiction to reality. But there are risks: The very idea could offer industry an excuse to maintain dangerous habits.”, 2021-01-18 (similar; bibliography)
“Viability of Greenhouse Gas Removal via Artificial Addition of Volcanic Ash to the Ocean”, Et Al 2020
“Viability of greenhouse gas removal via artificial addition of volcanic ash to the ocean”, 2020-12-01 (similar)
“Carbon Offsets Burning: A Major Fire in Oregon Illustrates the Challenges of Managing Forest Carbon Permanence”, Et Al 2020
“Carbon offsets burning: A major fire in Oregon illustrates the challenges of managing forest carbon permanence”, 2020-09-17 (backlinks; similar)
“Spreading Rock Dust on Fields Could Remove Vast Amounts of CO2 From Air: It May Be Best Near-term Way to Remove CO2, Say Scientists, but Cutting Fossil Fuel Use Remains Critical”, 2020
“Spreading rock dust on fields could remove vast amounts of CO2 from air: It may be best near-term way to remove CO2, say scientists, but cutting fossil fuel use remains critical”, 2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)
“Pulling Carbon from the Sky Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Carbon Dioxide Removal Is Becoming a Serious Proposition. But It Is Not a Substitute for Aggressive Action to Cut Emissions”, 2020
“Pulling carbon from the sky is necessary but not sufficient: Carbon dioxide removal is becoming a serious proposition. But it is not a substitute for aggressive action to cut emissions”, 2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)
“Removal of Atmospheric CO2 By Rock Weathering Holds Promise for Mitigating Climate Change: Large-scale Removal of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Might Be Achieved through Enhanced Rock Weathering. It Now Seems That This Approach Is As Promising As Other Strategies, in Terms of Cost and CO2-removal Potential”, 2020
“Removal of atmospheric CO2 by rock weathering holds promise for mitigating climate change: Large-scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere might be achieved through enhanced rock weathering. It now seems that this approach is as promising as other strategies, in terms of cost and CO2-removal potential”, 2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)
“Potential for Large-scale CO2 Removal via Enhanced Rock Weathering With Croplands”, Et Al 2020
“Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands”, 2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)
“Climate-driven Risks to the Climate Mitigation Potential of Forests”, Et Al 2020
“Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests”, 2020-06-09 (backlinks; similar)
“Negative Emissions—Part 2: Costs, Potentials and Side Effects”, Et Al 2020
“Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects”, 2020-05-22 (backlinks; similar)
“We Need To Take CO2 Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO2⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, 2020
“We Need To Take CO2 Out Of The Sky: To keep below two degrees, we’ll need to dramatically reduce current emissions and simultaneously remove 10–15 gigatons of CO2⁄yr from the atmosphere by 2050. Read on for what that means, why, and how we might do it.”, 2020-02-22 (backlinks; similar; bibliography)
“A Process for Capturing CO2 From the Atmosphere”, Et Al 2018
“A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere”, 2018-08-15 (backlinks; similar)
“Negative Emissions—Part 3: Innovation and Upscaling”, Et Al 2018
“Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling”, 2018-05-22 (backlinks; similar)
“Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis”, Et Al 2018
“Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis”, 2018-05-22 (backlinks; similar)
Wikipedia
Miscellaneous
-
https://spectrum.ieee.org/iron-powder-passes-first-industrial-test-as-renewable-co2free-fuel
-
https://www.additionalventures.org/initiatives/climate-action/oae-research-award/
-
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/20/can-carbon-dioxide-removal-save-the-world
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/climate/carbon-capture-tax-break.html
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/31/climate/is-carbon-capture-here.html
-
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/switching-out-fossil-fuel-feedstocks
-
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/11/whaling-whales-food-krill-iron/620604/
-
https://www.vox.com/recode/22394867/elon-musk-foundation-philanthropy-xprize-tesla-spacex
-
https://www.wired.com/story/big-business-burying-carbon-dioxide-capture-storage/
-
https://www.wired.com/story/the-quest-to-trap-carbon-in-stone-and-beat-climate-change/
Link Bibliography
-
2022-cherry.pdf
: “Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Todd L. Cherry, Stephan Kroll, David M. McEvoy, David Campoverde, Juan Moreno-Cruz: -
https://www.fastcompany.com/90659827/the-bootleg-fire-is-burning-through-trees-that-are-being-used-as-carbon-offsets
: “The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, Adele Peters: -
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/18/climate/carbon-removal-technology.html
: “Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, Brad Plumer, Christopher Flavelle: -
https://www.orbuch.com/carbon-removal/
: “We Need To Take CO<sub>2< / sub> Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO<sub>2< / sub>⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, Ryan Orbuch: