“Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Cherry Et Al 2022

“Climate cooperation in the shadow of solar geoengineering: an experimental investigation of the moral hazard conjecture”⁠, Todd L. Cherry, Stephan Kroll, David M. McEvoy, David Campoverde, Juan Moreno-Cruz2022-05-04 (similar; bibliography)

“Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, Bullock Et Al 2021

“Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”⁠, Liam A. Bullock, Rachael H. James, Juerg Matter, Phil Renforth, Damon A. H. Teagle2021-07-28 (backlinks; similar)

“The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, Peters2021

“The Bootleg fire is burning through trees that are being used as carbon offsets: One of the dangers of using trees as offsets is that they can suddenly and catastrophically release all their stored carbon”⁠, Adele Peters2021-07-28 (backlinks; similar; bibliography)

“Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies Said the United States Must Study Technologies That Would Artificially Cool the Planet by Reflecting Away Some Sunlight, Citing the Lack of Progress Fighting Global Warming.”, Flavelle2021

“Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies said the United States must study technologies that would artificially cool the planet by reflecting away some sunlight, citing the lack of progress fighting global warming.”⁠, Christopher Flavelle2021-03-25 (similar)

“Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, Sciences2021

“Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”⁠, National Academies of Sciences2021-03 (backlinks; similar)

“Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, Plumer & Flavelle2021

“Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A surge of corporate money could soon transform carbon removal from science fiction to reality. But there are risks: The very idea could offer industry an excuse to maintain dangerous habits.”⁠, Brad Plumer, Christopher Flavelle2021-01-18 (similar; bibliography)

“Viability of Greenhouse Gas Removal via Artificial Addition of Volcanic Ash to the Ocean”, Longman Et Al 2020

“Viability of greenhouse gas removal via artificial addition of volcanic ash to the ocean”⁠, Jack Longman, Martin R. Palmer, Thomas M. Gernon2020-12-01 (similar)

“Carbon Offsets Burning: A Major Fire in Oregon Illustrates the Challenges of Managing Forest Carbon Permanence”, Herbert Et Al 2020

“Carbon offsets burning: A major fire in Oregon illustrates the challenges of managing forest carbon permanence”⁠, Claudia Herbert, Jared Stapp, Grayson Badgley, William R. L. Anderegg, Danny Cullenward, Joseph Hamman2020-09-17 (backlinks; similar)

“Spreading Rock Dust on Fields Could Remove Vast Amounts of CO₂ From Air: It May Be Best Near-term Way to Remove CO₂, Say Scientists, but Cutting Fossil Fuel Use Remains Critical”, Carrington2020

“Spreading rock dust on fields could remove vast amounts of CO₂ from air: It may be best near-term way to remove CO₂, say scientists, but cutting fossil fuel use remains critical”⁠, Damian Carrington2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)

“Pulling Carbon from the Sky Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Carbon Dioxide Removal Is Becoming a Serious Proposition. But It Is Not a Substitute for Aggressive Action to Cut Emissions”, Nature2020

“Pulling carbon from the sky is necessary but not sufficient: Carbon dioxide removal is becoming a serious proposition. But it is not a substitute for aggressive action to cut emissions”⁠, Nature2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)

“Removal of Atmospheric CO₂ By Rock Weathering Holds Promise for Mitigating Climate Change: Large-scale Removal of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Might Be Achieved through Enhanced Rock Weathering. It Now Seems That This Approach Is As Promising As Other Strategies, in Terms of Cost and CO₂-removal Potential”, Lehmann & Possinger2020

“Removal of atmospheric CO₂ by rock weathering holds promise for mitigating climate change: Large-scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere might be achieved through enhanced rock weathering. It now seems that this approach is as promising as other strategies, in terms of cost and CO₂-removal potential”⁠, Johannes Lehmann, Angela Possinger2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)

“Potential for Large-scale CO₂ Removal via Enhanced Rock Weathering With Croplands”, Beerling Et Al 2020

“Potential for large-scale CO₂ removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands”⁠, David J. Beerling, Euripides P. Kantzas, Mark R. Lomas, Peter Wade, Rafael M. Eufrasio, Phil Renforth2020-07-08 (backlinks; similar)

“Climate-driven Risks to the Climate Mitigation Potential of Forests”, Anderegg Et Al 2020

“Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests”⁠, William R. L. Anderegg, Anna T. Trugman, Grayson Badgley, Christa M. Anderson, Ann Bartuska, Philippe Ciais2020-06-09 (backlinks; similar)

“Negative Emissions—Part 2: Costs, Potentials and Side Effects”, Fuss Et Al 2020

“Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects”⁠, Sabine Fuss, William F. Lamb, Max W. Callaghan, Jérôme Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann, Tim Beringer2020-05-22 (backlinks; similar)

“We Need To Take CO₂ Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO₂⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, Orbuch2020

“We Need To Take CO₂ Out Of The Sky: To keep below two degrees, we’ll need to dramatically reduce current emissions and simultaneously remove 10–15 gigatons of CO₂⁄yr from the atmosphere by 2050. Read on for what that means, why, and how we might do it.”⁠, Ryan Orbuch2020-02-22 (backlinks; similar; bibliography)

“A Process for Capturing CO₂ From the Atmosphere”, Keith Et Al 2018

“A Process for Capturing CO₂ from the Atmosphere”⁠, David W. Keith, Geoffrey Holmes, David St. Angelo, Kenton Heidel2018-08-15 (backlinks; similar)

“Negative Emissions—Part 3: Innovation and Upscaling”, Nemet Et Al 2018

“Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling”⁠, Gregory F. Nemet, Max W. Callaghan, Felix Creutzig, Sabine Fuss, Jens Hartmann, Jérôme Hilaire, William F. Lamb2018-05-22 (backlinks; similar)

“Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis”, Minx Et Al 2018

“Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis”⁠, Jan C. Minx, William F. Lamb, Max W. Callaghan, Sabine Fuss, Jérôme Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann2018-05-22 (backlinks; similar)

Wikipedia

1. Carbon dioxide removal

2. Carbon offset

3. Carbonate-silicate cycle

4. Enhanced weathering

5. Olivine § Uses

6. Stripe (company)