- See Also
-
Links
- “Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review”, Et Al 2022
- “Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment”, 2021
- “An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports”, Et Al 2021
- “Honest Signaling in Academic Publishing”, Et Al 2021
- “Peer Review As an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018”, 2020
- “Expert Consensus Procedure (ECO): Facilitating Robust Scientific Outputs”, Et Al 2020
- “Are Peer-reviews of Grant Proposals Reliable? An Analysis of Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Funding Applications”, 2020
- “Is Scholarly Refereeing Productive (at the Margin)?”, Et Al 2020
- “The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases”, 2019
- “The Sociology of Scientific Validity: How Professional Networks Shape Judgement in Peer Review”, Et Al 2018
- “Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise Of”Peer Review” in the Cold War United States”, 2018
- “Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds”, 2017
- “Protocol Review at The Lancet: 1997–2015”, 2015
- “A Two-step Manuscript Submission Process Can Reduce Publication Bias”, 2013
- “A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants”, Et Al 2010
- “Science in the 21St Century: Social, Political, and Economic Issues”, González-Álvarez 2008
- “Is Tenure Justified? An Experimental Study of Faculty Beliefs about Tenure, Promotion, and Academic Freedom”, Et Al 2007
- “Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance”, Ross & Al 2006
- “How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists”, 1994
- “The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality”, 1993
- “Reviewer Bias”, Et Al 1992
- “The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation”, 1990
- “The Story of the NIH Grants Programs”, 1989
- “On Publication Policy Regarding Non-Statistically-Significant Results: Some Comments on Dr. J. B. Rhine’s Article in the Comments Section of the J.P., 39, No 2, 135–142”, 1976
- “Models of Control and Control of Bias”, 1975
- “Editorial [EJP Editorial on Registered Reports]”, 1975b
- Miscellaneous
- Link Bibliography
See Also
Links
“Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review”, Et Al 2022
“Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review”, 2022-08-16 (similar)
“Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment”, 2021
“Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment”, 2021-09-20 (similar)
“An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports”, Et Al 2021
“An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports”, 2021-04-16 (; similar; bibliography)
“Honest Signaling in Academic Publishing”, Et Al 2021
“Honest signaling in academic publishing”, 2021-01-22 (; backlinks; similar)
“Peer Review As an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018”, 2020
“Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018”, 2020-11-18 (similar)
“Expert Consensus Procedure (ECO): Facilitating Robust Scientific Outputs”, Et Al 2020
“Expert Consensus Procedure (ECO): Facilitating Robust Scientific Outputs”, 2020-09-25 (backlinks; similar)
“Are Peer-reviews of Grant Proposals Reliable? An Analysis of Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Funding Applications”, 2020
“Are peer-reviews of grant proposals reliable? An analysis of Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funding applications”, 2020-03-06 (similar)
“Is Scholarly Refereeing Productive (at the Margin)?”, Et Al 2020
“The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases”, 2019
“The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases”, 2019-04-11 (; backlinks; similar)
“The Sociology of Scientific Validity: How Professional Networks Shape Judgement in Peer Review”, Et Al 2018
“The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review”, 2018-07-26 (; similar)
“Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise Of”Peer Review” in the Cold War United States”, 2018
“Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds”, 2017
“Protocol Review at The Lancet: 1997–2015”, 2015
“A Two-step Manuscript Submission Process Can Reduce Publication Bias”, 2013
“A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants”, Et Al 2010
“A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants”, 2010-11-24 (similar)
“Science in the 21St Century: Social, Political, and Economic Issues”, González-Álvarez 2008
“Is Tenure Justified? An Experimental Study of Faculty Beliefs about Tenure, Promotion, and Academic Freedom”, Et Al 2007
“Is tenure justified? An experimental study of faculty beliefs about tenure, promotion, and academic freedom”, 2007-02-08 (similar)
“Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance”, Ross & Al 2006
“How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists”, 1994
“How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists”, 1994 (similar)
“The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality”, 1993
“The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality”, 1993-10-01 (; similar)
“Reviewer Bias”, Et Al 1992
“Reviewer Bias”, 1992-06-01 (; similar)
“The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation”, 1990
“The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation”, 1990-03-09 (; backlinks; similar)
“The Story of the NIH Grants Programs”, 1989
“On Publication Policy Regarding Non-Statistically-Significant Results: Some Comments on Dr. J. B. Rhine’s Article in the Comments Section of the J.P., 39, No 2, 135–142”, 1976
“On Publication Policy Regarding Non-Statistically-Significant Results: Some comments on Dr. J. B. Rhine’s article in the comments section of the J.P., 39, No 2, 135–142”, 1976 (; backlinks; similar)
“Models of Control and Control of Bias”, 1975
“Models of Control and Control of Bias”, 1975 (; backlinks; similar)
“Editorial [EJP Editorial on Registered Reports]”, 1975b
“Editorial [EJP editorial on registered reports]”, 1975 (; backlinks; similar)
Miscellaneous
-
2018-pier.pdf2018 -
2016-findley.pdf2016 (; backlinks) -
2015-nyhan.pdf2015 -
2005-glymour.pdf2005 -
1989-weiss.pdf1989 -
1977-mahoney.pdf1977 -
1970-walster.pdf1970 -
https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review -
https://mattsclancy.substack.com/p/biases-against-risky-research -
https://nitter.moomoo.me/ryancbriggs/status/1630183763320684547
Link Bibliography
-
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/25152459211007467: “An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports”, Anne M. Scheel, Mitchell R. M. J. Schijen, Daniël Lakens: