Bibliography (15):

1. ‘Positive’ Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

2. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries

3. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

4. Registered reports: an early example and analysis

5. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science 2010–2015

6. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects

7. Effect Sizes Reported in Highly Cited Emotion Research Compared With Larger Studies and Meta-Analyses Addressing the Same Questions

8. Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value in research on the psychological consequences of scarcity

9. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

10. On Publication Policy Regarding Non-Statistically-Significant Results: Some comments on Dr. J. B. Rhine’s article in the comments section of the J.P., 39, No 2, 135–142

11. Wikipedia Bibliography:

    1. Publication bias

    2. Scholarly peer review § Result-blind peer review  :

       https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review#Result-blind_peer_review

    3. Preregistration (science) § Registered reports  :

       https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preregistration_(science)#Registered_reports

    4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_bar  :

       https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_bar

    5. Confidence interval