Athanasius Kircher![]() About the only thing he isn't reknowned for studying is Christianity, making him the consummate Jesuit.
Kircher's prodigious skills as a mathematician and especially as a linguist catapulted him to prominence at an early age. He studied—and in most cases, spoke and wrote—Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Italian, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Persian, Syrian, Samaritan, Armenian, Coptic and Ethiopian. Kircher spent several years as a conventionally successful teacher and scholar, but in 1628, he began down a path of esotericism that would make him a colorful intellectual celebrity along the lines of Salvador Dali or Andy Warhol, except with more mainstream acceptance.
As later scholars discovered, Kircher's theories were completely wrong in almost every respect (although he did correctly identify the relationship of hieroglyphics to spoken language). It is generally agreed, however, that Kircher was brilliantly wrong, which often works out better than being tediously right.
No matter how right you are, you will eventually be wrong. It happens to all the great minds. The poignant thing about Kircher was that he was so obviously and extraordinarily brilliant and yet so painfully and repeatedly wrong.
Despite his dalliances in the realms of occult metaphysics and paganism, Kircher was more good to Rome than he was a detriment as he employed his considerable intellect in what would turn out to be a largely hopeless attempt to reconcile the scientific advances of his day with Biblical history. As part of this quest, Kircher traveled to such exotic locations as the smoldering crater of Mount Vesuvius, where he attempted to discern the structure of the world (in order to make it conform to Biblical knowledge). The resulting study, Mundus Subturraneus, was a lavishly illustrated work in the budding scientific field of geology. Once again, Kircher's theories were brilliantly wrong, as he attempted to explain the action of volcanoes and bodies of water through an elaborate system of underground ducts and channels.
On the other hand, his epic study of magnetism, De Arte Magnetica, was far more colorful than accurate. In the fields of acoustics, optics and magnetism, Kircher was sufficiently adept to invent a series of clever and bizarre devices—from talking statues to magnetic clocks to image projectors—but his conclusions about the underlying theories were (as usual) well-reasoned, imaginative and wrong. Kircher attributed to magnetism everything from God to the movement of planets to the action of tides to sexual attraction.
Arithmologia also attempted to use math to integrate Eastern concepts with European metaphysics. In a separate tome, Kircher created the first scholarly documents outlining Chinese religion and mythology, including elements of Taoism and one of the first Western descriptions of the I-Ching. Again, his scholarly catalog was impressive, but the conclusions he drew from his data were way off base—Kircher claimed that Chinese ideogram writing was a corruption of his beloved hieroglyphic system and that the Chinese (and Mayans and Aztecs for that matter) were all descended from the Egyptians.
Kircher also invented a "camera obscura" which was remarkably similar in concept and structure to early photographic cameras—except that it was room-sized and didn't use film. Instead, an artist climbed inside the contraption and drew the image as it was projected on a piece of paper. One of his later obsessions was the strange document currently known as the "Voynich Manuscript"—a lengthy catalog of botanical illustrations annotated in a script that remains indecipherable to this day. Buoyed by what he imagined to be his success in solving the hieroglyphic code, Kircher spent the final years of his life on the document, which he possessed until he died.
On his death in 1680 at the age of 79, Kircher's body was buried in Rome, but according to his decidedly odd dying wish, his heart was removed and buried in a shrine he had constructed several miles away. The arrangment was strangely appropriate for a man whose mind had traveled across such wide spaces. In the years after his death, Kircher's reputation began to fall into disrepair as his numerous and often spectacular mistakes were revealed by later scholars. After the initial backlash, however, the staying power of Kircher's vibrant and imaginative ideas and artwork began to redeem his (mostly) forgivable mistakes. Author Umberto Eco was a leading voice in the rehabilitation of Kircher's reputation. The Jesuit is today remembered more for his genius than for his record on accuracy, which is entirely as it should be.
|