- See Also
-
Links
- “Being Good to Look Good: Self-Reported Moral Character Predicts Moral Double Standards among Reputation-Seeking Individuals”, Dong et al 2022
- “The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: A Replication-Extension in Chinese Mainland”, Hou et al 2022
- “Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers”, Schwitzgebel & Cushman 2021
- “Why Do Ethicists Eat Their Greens?”, Sneddon 2020
- “The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: A Replication-Extension in German-Speaking Countries”, Schönegger & Wagner 2019
- “The Behavior of Ethicists”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2016
- “Philosophers’ Biased Judgments Persist despite Training, Expertise and Reflection”, Schwitzgebel 2015
- “The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: Relationships among Self-Reported Behavior, Expressed Normative Attitude, and Directly Observed Behavior”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2014
- “What Do Philosophers Believe?”, Bourget & Chalmers 2013
- “Ethicists’ and Nonethicists’ Responsiveness to Student Emails: Relationships Among Expressed Normative Attitude, Self-Described Behavior, and Empirically Observed Behavior”, Rust & Schwitzgebel 2013
- “Ethicists’ Courtesy at Philosophy Conferences”, Schwitzgebel et al 2011b
- “The Self-Reported Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2011
- “Do Ethicists Steal More Books?”, Schwitzgebel 2009b
- “The Moral Behavior of Ethicists: Peer Opinion”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2009
- “Does It Harm Philosophy As a Discipline to Discuss the Apparently Meager Practical Effects of Studying Ethics?”
- Miscellaneous
- Link Bibliography
See Also
Links
“Being Good to Look Good: Self-Reported Moral Character Predicts Moral Double Standards among Reputation-Seeking Individuals”, Dong et al 2022
“The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: A Replication-Extension in Chinese Mainland”, Hou et al 2022
The moral behavior of ethics professors: A replication-extension in Chinese mainland
“Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers”, Schwitzgebel & Cushman 2021
“Why Do Ethicists Eat Their Greens?”, Sneddon 2020
“The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: A Replication-Extension in German-Speaking Countries”, Schönegger & Wagner 2019
The moral behavior of ethics professors: A replication-extension in German-speaking countries
“The Behavior of Ethicists”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2016
“Philosophers’ Biased Judgments Persist despite Training, Expertise and Reflection”, Schwitzgebel 2015
Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection
“The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: Relationships among Self-Reported Behavior, Expressed Normative Attitude, and Directly Observed Behavior”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2014
“What Do Philosophers Believe?”, Bourget & Chalmers 2013
“Ethicists’ and Nonethicists’ Responsiveness to Student Emails: Relationships Among Expressed Normative Attitude, Self-Described Behavior, and Empirically Observed Behavior”, Rust & Schwitzgebel 2013
“Ethicists’ Courtesy at Philosophy Conferences”, Schwitzgebel et al 2011b
“The Self-Reported Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2011
“Do Ethicists Steal More Books?”, Schwitzgebel 2009b
“The Moral Behavior of Ethicists: Peer Opinion”, Schwitzgebel & Rust 2009
“Does It Harm Philosophy As a Discipline to Discuss the Apparently Meager Practical Effects of Studying Ethics?”
Miscellaneous
Link Bibliography
-
2020-sneddon.pdf: “Why Do Ethicists Eat Their Greens?”, -
2019-schonegger.pdf: “The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: A Replication-Extension in German-Speaking Countries”,