The Early Days of Peer Review: 5 Insights from Historic Reports
Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews
Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis
ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews
Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirements
Comparing Analysis Blinding With Preregistration in the Many-Analysts Religion Project
Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports
Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018
Expert Consensus Procedure (ECO): Facilitating Robust Scientific Outputs
Are peer-reviews of grant proposals reliable? An analysis of Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funding applications
The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases
The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review
Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of ‘Peer Review’ in the Cold War United States
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds
Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study
To Apply or Not to Apply: A Survey Analysis of Grant Writing Costs and Benefits
A Two-Step Manuscript Submission Process Can Reduce Publication Bias
On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average
Telescope Time Without Tears: A Distributed Approach to Peer Review
Science in the 21st Century: Social, Political, and Economic Issues
Is tenure justified? An experimental study of faculty beliefs about tenure, promotion, and academic freedom
Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation
How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists
The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality
The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation
Publication Prejudices: An Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Review System
A Proposal for a New Editorial Policy in the Social Sciences
2021-scheel-figure2-positiveresultspublishedbyregularvsregisteredreportspyschologyresearch.jpg
https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2023-04-02/one-of-the-worlds-most-cited-scientists-rafael-luque-suspended-without-pay-for-13-years.html
https://mattsclancy.substack.com/p/biases-against-risky-research
https://mattsclancy.substack.com/p/can-taste-beat-peer-review
https://mattsclancy.substack.com/p/what-does-peer-review-know
https://theoryclass.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/a-mechanism-design-approach-to-peer-review/
https://www.cs.ucr.edu/~eamonn/Keogh_SIGKDD09_tutorial.pdf#page=8
https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review
https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/why-paul-ehrlich-got-everything-wrong
ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews
Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirements
https%253A%252F%252Fbmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com%252Farticles%252F10.1186%252Fs12916-023-02882-y.html
Comparing Analysis Blinding With Preregistration in the Many-Analysts Religion Project
https%253A%252F%252Fjournals.sagepub.com%252Fdoi%252Ffull%252F10.1177%252F25152459221128319.html
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports
https%253A%252F%252Fjournals.sagepub.com%252Fdoi%252Ffull%252F10.1177%252F25152459211007467.html
To Apply or Not to Apply: A Survey Analysis of Grant Writing Costs and Benefits
https%253A%252F%252Fjournals.plos.org%252Fplosone%252Farticle%253Fid%253D10.1371%252Fjournal.pone.0118494.html
Wikipedia Bibliography:
