Bibliography:

  1. SMPY Bibliography

  2. ‘high IQ’ tag

  3. SMPY Bibliography

  4. Genius Revisited Revisited

  5. Method considerations for school psychology from longitudinal research on gifted students

  6. Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY): Seeking Support for an Age-65 Follow Up and Ongoing Research

  7. Professor Marcia Gentry Walked the Talk

  8. Wrecked by Success? Not to Worry

  9. Identifying and Nurturing Future Innovators in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: A Review of Findings From the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth

  10. Social–Emotional Characteristics and Adjustment of Accelerated University Students: A Systematic Review

  11. In Search of Excellence: An Interview With Linda Brody

  12. Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?

  13. Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35–Year Longitudinal Study

  14. Does More Mean Less? Interest Surplus and the Gender Gap in STEM Careers

  15. Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests

  16. Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later

  17. Who Shines Most among the Brightest?: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study of Elite STEM Graduate Students

  18. Personality and School Functioning of Intellectually Gifted and Nongifted Adolescents: Self-Perceptions and Parents' Assessments

  19. Gifted Students

  20. Right-Tail Range Restriction: A Lurking Threat to Detecting Associations between Traits and Skill among Experts

  21. Individual Differences at the Top: Mapping the Outer Envelope of Intelligence

  22. Functional consequences of genetic loci associated with intelligence in a meta-analysis of 87,740 individuals

  23. Gifted Kids and High-Achievers Stay Fresh: Health Outcomes of Four SMPY Cohorts at Age 50

  24. A genome-wide association study for extremely high intelligence

  25. Developing talents: A longitudinal examination of intellectual ability and academic achievement

  26. What Innovations Have We Already Lost?: The Importance of Identifying and Developing Spatial Talent

  27. When Lightning Strikes Twice

  28. From Terman to Today

  29. Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later [Gelman commentary]

  30. Experts Are Born, Then Made: Combining Prospective and Retrospective Longitudinal Data Shows That Cognitive Ability Matters

  31. Genetics of Intellectual and Personality Traits Associated with Creative Genius: Could Geniuses Be Cosmobian Dragon Kings?

  32. Expanding Talent Search Procedures by Including Measures of Spatial Ability: CTY’s Spatial Test Battery

  33. Who Rises to the Top?: Early Indicators

  34. Spatial Ability: A Neglected Talent in Educational and Occupational Settings

  35. When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM productivity among mathematically precocious adolescents

  36. History and Development of Above-Level Testing of the Gifted

  37. _Human Intelligence_: Chapter 10, What Use Is Intelligence?

  38. The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature

  39. Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Intellectually Talented Preadolescents: Their Nature, Effects, and Possible Causes

  40. A Theory Explaining Sex Differences in High Mathematical Ability Has Been around for Some Time

  41. Talent Sleuth Extraordinaire: An Interview With Camilla P. Benbow

  42. Spatial Ability and STEM: A Sleeping Giant for Talent Identification and Development

  43. CDP391442 346..351

  44. Extending Sandra Scarr's Ideas about Development to the Longitudinal Study of Intellectually Precocious Youth

  45. The Johns Hopkins Talent Search Model for Identifying and Developing Exceptional Mathematical and Verbal Abilities

  46. Cognitive Epidemiology: With Emphasis on Untangling Cognitive Ability and Socioeconomic Status

  47. 10519_2009_9273_39_4-Web 350..358

  48. Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning over 50 years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance

  49. Ability Differences Among People Who Have Commensurate Degrees Matter for Scientific Creativity

  50. 12147_2007_9044_24_3-Web 1..11

  51. A Great Man Standing With Terman and Hollingworth: Julian C. Stanley (1918–2005)

  52. The Duke University Talent Identification Program

  53. Scholastic Assessment or g? The Relationship Between the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) and General Cognitive Ability

  54. Long-Term Effects of Educational Acceleration

  55. 2003 Award Winners: Edwin B. Newman Award

  56. Tending the Special Spark: Accelerated and Enriched Curricula for Highly Talented Art Students

  57. The Progress and Problems of an Incredibly Talented Sister and Brother

  58. A Genome-Wide Scan of 1842 DNA Markers for Allelic Associations with General Cognitive Ability: A Five-Stage Design Using DNA Pooling and Extreme Selected Groups

  59. Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study

  60. PSI—Vol 11#6

  61. Using Talent Searches to Identify and Meet the Educational Needs of Mathematically Talented Youngsters

  62. Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment

  63. A Quantitative Trait Locus Associated With Cognitive Ability in Children

  64. Citation: David Lubinski

  65. Varieties of Intellectual Talent

  66. Entering a Women's College Two Years Early

  67. My Education

  68. Educational Trajectories: Radical Accelerates Provide Insights

  69. Optimal Development Of Talent: Respond Educationally To Individual Differences In Personality

  70. Competence and Responsibility: The Third European Conference of The European Council for High Ability Held in Munich (Germany), October 11–14, 1992; Volume 2: Proceedings of the Conference

  71. Follow-up insights on rapid educational acceleration

  72. Beyond Terman: contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent

  73. The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way Along

  74. Consequences of Gender Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Some Biological Linkages

  75. Psychological Profiles of the Mathematically Talented: Some Sex Differences and Evidence Supporting Their Biological Basis

  76. The Origins and Development of High Ability

  77. Programs for Mathematically Gifted Students: A Review of Empirical Research

  78. Personality, Learning Style And Cognitive Style Profiles Of Mathematically Talented Students

  79. A Decade of Longitudinal Research On Academic Acceleration Through the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth

  80. Selected results of the Munich longitudinal study of giftedness: The multidimensional/typological giftedness model

  81. An Interview With Julian C. Stanley

  82. A Slice of Advice

  83. Educational Productivity Predictors Among Mathematically Talented Students

  84. Tribute to Halbert B. Robinson (1925–1981)

  85. A 10-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up of Participants in a Fast-Paced Mathematics Course

  86. Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A pilgrim in research in her time and ours

  87. Applying: A Mentor Model: For Young Mathematically Talented Students

  88. Eight Considerations for Mathematically Talented Youth

  89. Leta Hollingworth’s contributions to above-level testing of the gifted

  90. On Being a Misfit

  91. Most Fare Better

  92. Extreme Mathematical Talent: A Hormonally Induced Ability?

  93. Media Review: Books: Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model

  94. State Residential High Schools for Mathematically Talented Youth

  95. Note About Possible Bias Resulting When Under-Statisticized Studies Are Excluded from Meta-Analyses

  96. Chapter 1: SMPY's Model for Teaching Mathematically Precocious Students

  97. Social and Emotional Adjustment of Adolescents Extremely Talented in Verbal or Mathematical Reasoning

  98. Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented

  99. SAT-M Scores of Highly Selected Students in Shanghai Tested When Less Than 13 Years Old

  100. Identification and Fostering of Mathematically Gifted Students

  101. Early Instruction by the College: Johns Hopkins's Center for Talented Youth

  102. Visual Thinking: The Art of Imagining Reality

  103. A Baker's Dozen of Years Applying All 4 Aspects of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY)

  104. Terence Tao

  105. Spatial Ability and Testosterone

  106. Writing Instruction for Verbally Talented Youth: The Johns Hopkins Model

  107. The Exceptionally Talented

  108. Opening Doors for the Gifted: A Flexible Curriculum Will Provide Valuable Learning Options for Gifted Students, according to Directors of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth at the Johns Hopkins University

  109. Fast-Paced Classes: Challenging Gifted Students

  110. New Projects: Seeking Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically

  111. Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective

  112. The Joys and Challenges in Raising a Gifted Child

  113. Duke University's Talent Identification Program

  114. Development of Superior Mathematical Ability During Adolescence

  115. One Small Step for the Mathematically Gifted

  116. Exceptionally Gifted Boys and Their Parents

  117. German for Verbally Gifted Youngsters at Hopkins: The First Year

  118. Manipulate important educational variables

  119. The Talent-Search Concept: an Identification Strategy for the Intellectually Gifted

  120. Searching for Scientifically Talented Youth?

  121. The Johns Hopkins Program for Verbally Gifted Youth

  122. Early Entrance to College: The Johns Hopkins Experience; Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY), The Johns Hopkins University

  123. The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth

  124. The Future of Education

  125. Cognitive Characteristics of the Top-Scoring Third of the 1976 Talent Search Contestants

  126. Is Sex Role Related To Intellectual Abilities?

  127. Educational Programs and Intellectual Prodigies

  128. Now We Are Six: The Ever-Expanding SMPY

  129. Radical Acceleration: Recent Educational Innovation At JHU

  130. Parental Support—Time and Energ

  131. Books Tell The SMPY Story

  132. Individualizing Science Curricula for the Gifted

  133. Accelerating Mathematics Instruction for the Mathematically Talented

  134. Merrill Kenneth Wolf: a Bachelor's Degree At 14

  135. My Introduction To Computing

  136. College Courses and Educational Facilitation of the Gifted

  137. Concern for Intellectually Talented Youths: How It Originated and Fluctuated

  138. Youths Who Reason Extremely Well Mathematically: Smpy's Accelerative Approach

  139. Rationale of Smpy During Its First 7 Years of Promoting Educational Acceleration

  140. Teacher and Pupil Stereotypes of Gifted Boys and Girls

  141. Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science

  142. Creativity in Science through Visualization

  143. Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance

  144. Scientific Careers and Vocational Development Theory: A Review, a Critique and Some Recommendations

  145. On the adequacy of standardized tests administered to extreme norm groups

  146. 一项持续53年的研究:成为天才需要什么?

  147. Predictive Power of Early Childhood IQ

  148. The 62-Year-Old Child Genius: In 1969, a Very Smart 13 Year-Old Began His Undergraduate College Education—A Move That Would Come to Influence How We Think about Gifted Children for the next Four Decades.

  149. The Poor Neglected Gifted Child

  150. 23415c3f5ec60b9de18acfd9ad92ab7aec573628.html

  151. Thinking Positively: The Genetics of High Intelligence

  152. design#future-tag-features

    [Transclude the forward-link's context]

  153. 2016-makel-figure1-tipsmpyiqscatterplot.jpg

  154. 2016-makel-table1-accomplishments.png

  155. 2016-makel-table2-creativeaccomplishments.png

  156. 2016-makel-table2-eliteaccomplishments.png

  157. 2016-makel-table4-elitejobs.png

  158. 2016-makel-table5-eliteprofessors.png

  159. 2015-brody.pdf

  160. 2014-beattie.pdf

  161. 2014-brody.pdf

  162. 2014-kell.pdf

  163. 2014-lubinski.pdf

  164. 2014-wai-2.pdf

  165. 2013-kell-2.pdf

  166. 2013-park-figure3-survivalanalysisofstemachievementofacceleratedsmpystudentsvspropensitymatchedcontrols.jpg

  167. 2010-steenbergenhu.pdf

  168. 2010-wai.pdf

  169. 2010-robertson-figure1-nothreshold.jpg

  170. 2009-ferriman.pdf

  171. 2009-steenbergenhu.pdf

  172. 2009-wai-2.pdf

  173. 2009-wai-figureb1-meanintelligencescoresbycollegemajorfield.jpg

  174. 2008-leder.pdf

  175. 2007-brody.pdf

  176. 2007-halpern.pdf

  177. 2007-lubinski.pdf

  178. 2007-park.pdf

  179. 2007-spielhagen.pdf

  180. 2007-swiatek.pdf

  181. 2007-webb.pdf

  182. 2007-park-2.pdf

  183. 2006-benbow.pdf

  184. 2006-muratori.pdf

  185. 2006-lubinski-2.pdf

  186. 2006-lubinski.pdf

  187. 2005-barnett.pdf

  188. 2005-brody.pdf

  189. 2005-frost.pdf

  190. 2005-gilheany.pdf

  191. 2005-olszewskikubilius.pdf

  192. 2005-rigby.pdf

  193. 2005-stanley.pdf

  194. 2005-touron.pdf

  195. 2005-wallace-2.pdf

  196. 2005-ybarra.pdf

  197. 2005-brody-2.pdf

  198. 2005-brody-3.pdf

  199. 2005-touron-2.pdf

  200. 2005-touron-3.pdf

  201. 2005-wai.pdf

  202. 2004-bleskerechek.pdf

  203. 2004-lubinski.pdf

  204. 2003-achter.pdf

  205. 2003-gross.pdf

  206. 2003-kerr.pdf

  207. 2002-hill.pdf

  208. 2002-webb.pdf

  209. 2001-lubinski.pdf

  210. 2001-lubinski-2.pdf

  211. 2001-lubinski-3.pdf

  212. 2000-ceci.pdf

  213. 2000-lubinski.pdf

  214. 2000-stanley.pdf

  215. 2000-swiatek.pdf

  216. 2000-heller-internationalhandbookofgiftednessandtalent2ed.pdf

  217. 1999-achter.pdf

  218. 1998-pyryt.pdf

  219. 1998-schmidt.pdf

  220. 1997-achter.pdf

  221. 1997-benbow.pdf

  222. 1997-petrill.pdf

  223. 1997-colangelo-handbookofgiftededucation2ed.pdf

  224. 1996-achter.pdf

  225. 1996-benbow-intellectualtalentpsychometricandsocialissues.pdf

  226. 1996-benbow.pdf

  227. 1996-lubinski.pdf

  228. 1996-stanley.pdf

  229. 1995-lubinski.pdf

  230. 1995-sanders.pdf

  231. 1994-albert.pdf

  232. 1994-lubinski.pdf

  233. 1994-ng.pdf

  234. 1993-heller-internationaldhandbookgiftednesstalent.pdf

  235. 1993-lubinski.pdf

  236. 1993-southern.pdf

  237. 1992-benbow.pdf

  238. 1992-brody.pdf

  239. 1992-lubinski.pdf

  240. 1992-pyryt.pdf

  241. 1992-stanley-2.pdf

  242. 1992-benbow-2.pdf

  243. 1992-lubinski-2.pdf

  244. 1991-stanley.pdf

  245. 1991-swiatek.pdf

  246. 1991-stanley-2.pdf

  247. 1990-benbow-3.pdf

  248. 1990-dark.pdf

  249. 1990-dauber.pdf

  250. 1990-lubinski.pdf

  251. 1990-lynch.pdf

  252. 1990-richardson.pdf

  253. 1990-benbow-2.pdf

  254. 1989-anonymous.pdf

  255. 1989-stanley.pdf

  256. 1989-stanley-2.pdf

  257. 1988-stanley.pdf

  258. 1987-benbow.pdf

  259. 1987-brody.pdf

  260. 1987-fox.pdf

  261. 1987-holden.pdf

  262. 1987-stanley.pdf

  263. 1987-stanley-4.pdf

  264. 1986-benbow.pdf

  265. 1986-stanley.pdf

  266. 1985-gagne.pdf

  267. 1985-gleser.pdf

  268. 1985-stanley.pdf

  269. 1985-vining.pdf

  270. 1985-stanley-3.pdf

  271. 1984-benbow.pdf

  272. 1984-holmes.pdf

  273. 1984-stanley.pdf

  274. 1983-benbow-academicprecocity.pdf

  275. 1983-feldhusen.pdf

  276. 1983-fox.pdf

  277. 1983-lunny.pdf

  278. 1983-mezynski.pdf

  279. 1983-michael.pdf

  280. 1983-pollins.pdf

  281. 1983-robinson.pdf

  282. 1983-vantasselbaska.pdf

  283. 1983-benbow-2.pdf

  284. 1983-benbow-3.pdf

  285. 1983-benbow-4.pdf

  286. 1983-benbow-5.pdf

  287. 1983-benbow-6.pdf

  288. 1983-benbow-7.pdf

  289. 1983-benbow-8.pdf

  290. 1983-stanley-2.pdf

  291. 1983-stanley-3.pdf

  292. 1983-stanley-4.pdf

  293. 1983-stanley-5.pdf

  294. 1982-benbow.pdf

  295. 1982-stanley.pdf

  296. 1981-bartkovich.pdf

  297. 1981-fox.pdf

  298. 1981-stanley.pdf

  299. 1980-becker.pdf

  300. 1980-benbow.pdf

  301. 1980-brody.pdf

  302. 1980-fox-womenandthemathematicalmystique.pdf

  303. 1980-fox.pdf

  304. 1980-mezynski.pdf

  305. 1980-stanley.pdf

  306. 1980-benbow-2.pdf

  307. 1979-cohn.pdf

  308. 1979-daurio.pdf

  309. 1979-davis.pdf

  310. 1979-fox.pdf

  311. 1979-george-educatingthegifted.pdf

  312. 1979-laycock-giftedchildren.pdf

  313. 1979-mills.pdf

  314. 1979-cohn-2.pdf

  315. 1979-fox-2.pdf

  316. 1978-albert.pdf

  317. 1978-stanley-2.pdf

  318. 1977-fox.pdf

  319. 1977-getzels.pdf

  320. 1977-stanley-thegiftedandthecreative.pdf

  321. 1977-stanley.pdf

  322. 1977-stanley-3.pdf

  323. 1976-fox.pdf

  324. 1976-hogan.pdf

  325. 1976-keating-intellectualtalentresearchanddevelopment.pdf

  326. 1976-fox-2.pdf

  327. 1976-fox-3.pdf

  328. 1976-stanley-4.pdf

  329. 1976-stanley-5.pdf

  330. 1975-hogan.pdf

  331. 1975-keating.pdf

  332. 1975-solano.pdf

  333. 1974-hogan.pdf

  334. 1974-stanley-mathematicaltalentdiscoverydescriptiondevelopment.pdf

  335. 1973-stanley.pdf

  336. gwern-iq-smpytip.png

  337. https://www.amazon.com/Human-Intelligence-Earl-Hunt/dp/0521707811

  338. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/03/the-math-revolution/426855/

  339. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkPQHIUHWwc

  340. https://x.com/hsu_steve/status/1039544799689355271

  341. Wrecked by Success? Not to Worry

  342. %252Fdoc%252Fiq%252Fhigh%252Fsmpy%252F2022-kell.pdf.html

  343. Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning over 50 years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance

  344. %252Fdoc%252Fiq%252Fhigh%252Fsmpy%252F2009-wai.pdf.html

  345. Personality, Learning Style And Cognitive Style Profiles Of Mathematically Talented Students

  346. %252Fdoc%252Fiq%252Fhigh%252Fsmpy%252F1993-mills.pdf.html

  347. Leta Stetter Hollingworth: A pilgrim in research in her time and ours

  348. %252Fdoc%252Fiq%252Fhigh%252Fsmpy%252F1990-benbow.pdf.html

  349. Terence Tao

  350. %252Fdoc%252Fiq%252Fhigh%252Fsmpy%252F1984-clements.pdf.html