“Sorry, Prey. Black Widows Have Surprisingly Good Memory: Despite Having Tiny Arthropod Brains, Spiders in a New Experiment Showed Some Complex Cognitive Calculations”, Max G. Levy2022-10-31 (; backlinks)⁠:

Black widows must despise Clint Sergi. While working on his PhD in biology at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Sergi spent his time designing little challenges for spiders—which often involved rewarding them with tasty dead crickets, or confounding them by stealing the crickets away. “The big question that motivated the work was just wanting to know what is going on inside the minds of animals”, he says.

Biologists already know spider brains aren’t like human brains. Their sensory world is geared for life in webs and dark corners. “Humans are very visual animals”, says Sergi. “These web-building spiders have almost no vision. They have eyes, but they’re mostly good for sensing light and motion.” Instead, he says, a black widow’s perception comes mainly from vibrations, kind of like hearing. “Their legs are sort of like ears that pick up the vibrations through the web.”

…So Sergi and his adviser, spider cognition expert Rafa Rodríguez, decided to put black widow memory to the test. As you might guess, Sergi would offer spiders dead crickets and then steal them back.

The result, they wrote in the journal Ethology, shows that black widows have better memories than previously known. When their prey is spirited away, the spiders search for it repeatedly in the right place. In some cases, they appear to recall the prey’s size—searching more for the biggest stolen snacks. “They’re not just reacting to a particular stimulus using set patterns of behavior”, says Sergi. “They have the capacity to make decisions”…“It shows that arthropods are capable of encoding complex memories that people oftentimes associate with vertebrates”, says Andrew Gordus, a behavioral neuroscientist with Johns Hopkins University who was not involved in the work. “Invertebrates are a lot more sophisticated than we give them credit for.”

…Yet last year, Sergi published evidence that black widows are capable of path integration, which means that a roaming individual can remember the distance and direction to their retreat, a corner of the web where they rest and eat. He found that they can move around the web without retracing their steps, and even take shortcuts. This time, based on Rodríguez’s previous evidence from banana spiders, Sergi wanted to see if his black widows could search the web for stolen prey—a sign that they can change their behavior when prompted by a memory, rather than just in immediate reaction to an event.

…His team’s experiment began with empty plastic boxes, each about a foot wide and deep and 4 inches tall. Sergi would let a black widow build its web inside for one week—“probably a little overkill, but also to make sure that they’re hungry and motivated to attack crickets”, he says. In arachnology parlance, each web has two main sections: an upper sheet, which looks like dense net of silk, and a forest of “gumfooted” lines that connect the sheet to a base, like a windowsill or a branch. Gumfooted lines nab crawly creatures like beetles or caterpillars, and sheets catch creatures flying by. Once the web was ready, Sergi would place a dead cricket into either the sheet or gumfooted lines. Black widows sense that they’ve snagged a meal based on motion and tension in their lines. They approach and touch the prey, then quickly flick out sticky silk and begin wrapping it to immobilize it. Under normal circumstances, the spiders would lug their prey back on a line of silk to their retreat. (“Think of a rock climber’s chalk bag, suspended from their waist by a short cord”, Sergi says.) After that, the widows feast: “They’ll suck the juices out of the exoskeleton, then they’ll chuck the exoskeleton back out.”

But this time, Sergi stole the feast before they got the chance. He’d snip that line of silk with scissors and yank the cricket back with forceps.

As the black widows went in search of their purloined prey, Sergi’s team would count how many bouts of searching each spider performed. “Each new bout of searching is a decision by the spider to continue searching”, he says.

From these observations, the team made two conclusions: The spiders searched the part of the web where the cricket had been—the sheet or the lines—which indicated a memory of prey location. And when Sergi stole prey from the gumfooted lines, the spiders made more searches for prey that was especially large relative to themselves. To Sergi, it’s an indicator that the spiders are more responsive to this land-dwelling prey, which is often a more reliable meal.