“Do Humans Agree on Which Body Odors Are Attractive, Similar to the Agreement Observed When Rating Faces and Voices?”, 2023-02-14 ():
[cf. et al 2017 etc] Studies of mate choice from an evolutionary perspective often begin by investigating whether individuals of one sex share similar preferences for mates. Evidence for shared preferences is often interpreted as support for the hypothesis that preferences are adaptations that have evolved to select high-quality mates. To date, the importance of body odor in human mate choice is uncertain because fundamental questions, such as whether preferences for body odor are shared, have not yet been systematically explored.
Here, we asked groups of heterosexual men and women from the University of Pennsylvania to rate the attractiveness of body odors, faces, and voices of opposite-sex individuals. We used our data to produce quantitative estimates of the amount of rater agreement for each of the 3 modalities of attractiveness, applying a uniform methodology that facilitates cross-modality comparisons.
Overall, we found evidence of agreement within all 3 modalities. Yet, our data also suggest a larger component of attractiveness judgments that can be attributed to personal preferences and idiosyncratic noise.
Importantly, our results provide no evidence that agreement regarding odor attractiveness is substantially quantitatively different from the amount of agreement found in other modalities that have been the focus of most previous work. To the extent that evidence exists of shared preferences for faces and voices, our results reveal evidence of shared preferences for body odors.
[Keywords: olfaction, body odor, mate choice, face attractiveness, voice attractiveness, multimodal perception]