“Microstratigraphic Preservation of Ancient Faunal and Hominin DNA in Pleistocene Cave Sediments”, Diyendo Massilani, Mike W. Morley, Susan M. Mentzer, Vera Aldeias, Benjamin Vernot, Christopher Miller, Mareike Stahlschmidt, Maxim B. Kozlikin, Michael V. Shunkov, Anatoly P. Derevianko, Nicholas J. Conard, Sarah Wurz, Christopher S. Henshilwood, Javi Vasquez, Elena Essel, Sarah Nagel, Julia Richter, Birgit Nickel, Richard G. Roberts, Svante Pääbo, Viviane Slon, Paul Goldberg, Matthias Meyer2021-12-27 ()⁠:

[where does ancient sedimentary DNA come from? bone/poo] DNA preserved in sediments has emerged as an important source of information about past ecosystems, independent of the discovery of skeletal remains. However, little is known about the sources of sediment DNA, the factors affecting its long-term preservation, and the extent to which it may be translocated after deposition. Here, we show that impregnated blocks of intact sediment are excellent archives of DNA. DNA distribution is highly heterogeneous at the microscale in the cave sediment we studied, suggesting that post-depositional movement of DNA is unlikely to be a common phenomenon in cases where the stratigraphy is undisturbed. Combining micromorphological analysis with microstratigraphic retrieval of ancient DNA therefore allows genetic information to be associated with the detailed archaeological and ecological record preserved in sediments.


Ancient DNA recovered from Pleistocene sediments represents a rich resource for the study of past hominin and environmental diversity. However, little is known about how DNA is preserved in sediments and the extent to which it may be translocated between archaeological strata.

Here, we investigate DNA preservation in 47 blocks of resin-impregnated archaeological sediment collected over the last 4 decades for micromorphological analyses at 13 prehistoric sites in Europe, Asia, Africa, and North America and show that such blocks can preserve DNA of hominins and other mammals.

Extensive microsampling of sediment blocks from Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains reveals that the taxonomic composition of mammalian DNA differs drastically at the millimeter-scale and that DNA is concentrated in small particles, especially in fragments of bone and feces (coprolites), suggesting that these are substantial sources of DNA in sediments. 3 microsamples taken in close proximity in one of the blocks yielded Neanderthal DNA from at least two male individuals closely related to Denisova 5, a Neanderthal toe bone previously recovered from the same layer.

Figure 3: Targeted sampling of micro-features from block DCE5C. (A) Surface scan with sampling locations and layer designations. (B) Number of library DNA molecules recovered from each sample. (C) Library preparation efficiencies. (D) µXRF surface scan for P (orange) and Ca (aqua) produces a distribution map of calcium phosphate (yellow) that indicates fragments of hydroxyapatite from bone and coprolite as well as phosphatized limestone (red frames) and secondary calcite (magenta frame). (E) µXRF surface scan for Cu (white).

Our work indicates that DNA can remain stably localized in sediments over time and provides a means of linking genetic information to the archaeological and ecological records on a microstratigraphic scale.