“Overcoming Attenuation Bias in Regressions Using Polygenic Indices”, Hans van Kippersluis, Pietro Biroli, Rita Dias Pereira, Titus J. Galama, Stephanie von Hinke, S. Fleur W. Meddens, Dilnoza Muslimova, Eric A. W. Slob, Ronald de Vlaming, Cornelius A. Rietveld2023-07-25 (heritability)⁠:

Measurement error in polygenic indices (PGIs) attenuates the estimation of their effects in regression models. We analyze and compare two approaches addressing this attenuation bias: Obviously Related Instrumental Variables (ORIV) and the PGI Repository Correction (PGI-RC).

Through simulations, we show that:

the PGI-RC performs slightly better than ORIV, unless the prediction sample is very small (n < 1000) or when there is considerable assortative mating. Within families, ORIV is the best choice since the PGI-RC correction factor is generally not available.

We verify the empirical validity of the simulations by predicting educational attainment and height in a sample of siblings from the UK Biobank.

We show that applying ORIV between families increases the standardized effect of the PGI by 12% (height) and by 22% (educational attainment) compared to a meta-analysis-based PGI, yet estimates remain slightly below the PGI-RC estimates. Furthermore, within-family ORIV regression provides the tightest lower bound for the direct genetic effect, increasing the lower bound for the standardized direct genetic effect on educational attainment 0.14 → 0.18 (+29%), and for height 0.54 → 0.61 (+13%) compared to a meta-analysis-based PGI.