[OSF] Romantic (typically sexual) relationships are important to personal, physical, mental, social, and economic well-being, and to human evolution. Yet little is known about factors contributing to long-term lack of intimate relationships.
We investigated phenotypic and genetic correlates of never having had sex in ~400,000 UK residents aged 39–73 and ~13,500 Australian residents aged 18–89.
The strongest associations revealed that sexless individuals were more educated, less likely to use alcohol and smoke, more nervous, lonelier, and unhappier. Sexlessness was more strongly associated with physical characteristics (eg. upper body strength) in men than in women.
Sexless men tended to live in regions with fewer women, and sexlessness was more prevalent in regions with more income inequality. Common [SNP heritability] genetic variants explained 17% and 14% of variation in sexlessness in men and women, with a genetic correlation between sexes of 0.56…Note that the combined SNP-based heritability (12%) is lower than the sex-specific heritability, likely because SNP-based heritabilities tend to decline as heterogeneous groups are combined…Polygenic scores predicted a range of related outcomes in the Australian dataset.
Our findings uncover multifaceted correlates of human intimacy of evolutionary importance.
…Data on sexlessness were available for 405,117 British individuals of European descent, 218,744 females and 186,373 males. Of those, 3,929 individuals (2,068 females and 1,861 males, both ~1%) responded that they have never had vaginal, oral, or anal intercourse. To examine phenotypic correlates of sexlessness, we selected 253 phenotypes (Table S1) that had an effective sample size larger than 10,000 and were related to domains of mental health, sleep, exercise, substance use, risk taking behavior, cognition, health, and occupation. Sexlessness was statistically-significantly associated with 149 of these traits (Table S2), of which 35 explained 1% or more of the variance (presented in Figure 1). The strongest associations were observed for phenotypes related to social connection and substance use. Sexlessness was associated with less and shorter mobile phone use, a lower chance of being in a confiding relationship, fewer friend and family visits, less alcohol and nicotine use, wearing glasses at an earlier age, and lower grip strength. Sexlessness was also associated with feeling more nervous and lonely and less happy, confirming its strong relevance to wellbeing.
Sexlessness was coded as 0 = has had sex, 1 = never had sex. Results are shown for the full (sexes pooled) sample, as well as for males and females separately. Only associations that were statistically-significant in at least one of the analyses (ie. sexes pooled, males, or females) and explaining 1% or more variance are shown. Full results can be found in Table S2: Note that to improve clarity, in some instances variable names and coding have been changed from the original UK Biobank names/coding, see Table S1.
…Previous work has linked lifetime sexlessness with higher education statistically-significantly only in women7, though other work has shown periods of sexlessness, or sexlessness in young people, to be associated with lower education and lower income6. Here we show a small but highly statistically-significant positive phenotypic association of sexlessness with education in both men and women; we also found a negative association with household income and a positive association with the economic deprivation (Townsend index) of their neighbourhood, but these are likely reflect the economic ramifications of remaining single (eg. household income will be lower than for couples). Also note that the genetic correlations of sexlessness with these traits are actually in the opposite direction of the phenotypic correlations.
More striking are the substantial (~0.5) genetic correlations not only with higher education but with higher childhood and adult intelligence (IQ), as well as higher income and socioeconomic status. On the face of it, these associations are counterintuitive, especially from an evolutionary perspective in which intelligence and resources are supposed to be attractive traits in a potential partner, though see et al 2021. In line with that perspective, a recent study also using UK Biobank data showed that men who carry a higher burden of rare deleterious genetic variants (that ablate protein-coding genes) have a lower educational attainment and IQ and fewer children. Moreover, the association between the burden of deleterious variants and number of children was partly mediated by sexlessness. Obvious explanations for the positive associations we found, which apply to both men and women, are not apparent to us. We might wonder whether Conscientiousness facilitates commitment to education or religion at the expense of seeking sexual partners. Still, it is difficult to explain the even higher estimates of genetic correlations with childhood IQ, which is supposedly less strongly related to Conscientiousness than is educational attainment.
In making sense of the observed pattern of correlates of sexlessness, it would be remiss to overlook the resemblance of this pattern of characteristics—introverted, wearing glasses at a young age, intelligent, academically successful, physically weaker, socially disconnected, lonely, higher on the autistic spectrum, nervous, engaging less with drugs and alcohol—to the stereotype of a “nerd”, which is in turn associated with lack of romantic success (indeed, being unattractive is in several dictionary definitions for “nerd”).
The nerd stereotype is perhaps most associated with adolescence, though, whereas the participants in this study are 39–73 years old. It is worth noting again that adolescent experiences (or lack thereof) and identity formation may in some cases have long-lasting effects with regard to sexlessness.