“Putting ChatGPT’s Medical Advice to the (Turing) Test”, 2023-01-24 ():
Importance: Chatbots could play a role in answering patient questions, but patients’ ability to distinguish between provider and chatbot responses, and patients’ trust in chatbots’ functions are not well established.
Objective: To assess the feasibility of using ChatGPT or a similar AI-based chatbot for patient-provider communication.
Design: Survey in January 2023.
Setting: Survey Participants: A US representative sample of 400 study participants aged 18 and above was recruited on Prolific, a crowdsourcing platform for academic studies. 384 participants filled out the full survey. After removing participants who spent less than 3 minutes on the survey, 360 respondents remained. 53.3% of respondents analyzed were women; their average age was 45.4.
Exposures: 10 representative non-administrative patient-provider interactions were extracted from the EHR. Patients’ questions were placed in ChatGPT with a request for the chatbot to respond using the same word count as the human providers response. In the survey, each patients question was followed by a provider/ChatGPT-generated response. Participants were informed that 5 responses were provider-generated and 5 were chatbot-generated. Participants were asked, and incentivized financially, to correctly identify the response source. Participants were also asked about their trust in chatbots’ functions in patient-provider communication, using a Likert scale of 1–5.
Main Outcomes & Measures: Main outcome: Proportion of responses correctly classified as provider vs chatbot-generated.
Secondary outcomes: Average and standard deviation of responses to trust questions.
Results: The correct classification of responses ranged between 23.4% to 86.7% for different questions. On average, chatbot responses were identified correctly 60.0% of the time and provider responses were identified correctly 62.3% of the time. On average, responses toward patients’ trust in chatbots’ functions were weakly positive (mean Likert score: 3.4), with lower trust as the health-related complexity of the task in questions increased.
Conclusions & Relevance: ChatGPT responses to patient questions were close to indistinguishable from provider responses. Laypeople appear to trust the use of chatbots to answer lower risk health questions. It is important to continue studying patient-chatbot interaction as chatbots move from administrative to more clinical roles in healthcare. [code]