“How Microsoft’s Multibillion-Dollar Alliance With OpenAI Really Works: ChatGPT Maker Quietly Clarifies That Tech Giant Has No Equity despite $13bn Investment—But Is in Line to Make Big Profits”, Tim Bradshaw, Madhumita Murgia, George Hammond, Camilla Hodgson2023-12-15 ()⁠:

…Those IP rights could have been substantial if Sam Altman and other OpenAI employees had gone to work at Microsoft, as was proposed by Satya Nadella before Altman’s reinstatement. “A lot of relevant technology could have gone with him”, this person said. “Microsoft is technically a competitor but has all the IP, which puts it in a stronger position.”

Microsoft declined to comment on the details of its agreement with OpenAI. It is unclear how long any exclusivity agreements may last.

Transactions involving non-profit organizations are often exempt from the usual pre-merger notification requirements under the US Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, which may have helped to shield Microsoft’s investment from regulatory scrutiny.

However, the US Federal Trade Commission is now looking into Microsoft’s investment in the company, according to a person familiar with the matter, although no formal investigation has been launched.

Any US probe and that of the UK Competition and Markets Authority, which is expected to begin formally next year, are likely to hinge on whether Microsoft’s influence over OpenAI has grown in recent months, either as a result of January’s expansion of their alliance or last month’s boardroom bust-up.

Ever since the launch of ChatGPT in November last year, OpenAI has been divided internally over its commercial direction, including which products to pursue and invest in.

According to one person close to the leadership’s deliberations, some OpenAI executives felt pressured by Microsoft to commercialize faster, as it “really wanted to be deploying AI products and be an AI leader and make money”.

During the leadership crisis at OpenAI last month, Microsoft was given no warning from the board about the coming ructions and raced to re-establish stability. “They wanted more visibility, but everyone realised that them having an actual board seat would be a non-starter”, this person said.

It was eventually agreed that Microsoft would take a non-voting observer role on a reconfigured board. This would “certainly give [Microsoft] some level of additional influence”, this person added, but suggested that would be a positive step for the start-up’s governance. “There would be more of an expectation that things at OpenAI be done by the book.”