The last several years have witnessed remarkable progress in video-and-language (VidL) understanding. However, most modern VidL approaches use complex and specialized model architectures and sophisticated pretraining protocols, making the reproducibility, analysis and comparisons of these frameworks difficult.
Hence, instead of proposing yet another new VidL model, this paper conducts a thorough empirical study demystifying the most important factors in the VidL model design. Among the factors that we investigate are (1) the spatiotemporal architecture design, (2) the multimodal fusion schemes, (3) the pretraining objectives, (4) the choice of pretraining data, (5) pretraining and finetuning protocols, and (6) dataset and model scaling.
Our empirical study reveals that the most important design factors include: temporal modeling, video-to-text multimodal fusion, masked modeling objectives, and joint training on images and videos. Using these empirical insights, we then develop a step-by-step recipe, dubbed VindLU, for effective VidL pretraining. Our final model trained using our recipe achieves comparable or better than state-of-the-art results on several VidL tasks without relying on external CLIP pretraining. In particular, on the text-to-video retrieval task, our approach obtains 61.2% on DiDeMo, and 55.0% on ActivityNet, outperforming current SOTA by 7.8% and 6.1% respectively. Furthermore, our model also obtains state-of-the-art video question-answering results on ActivityNet-QA, MSRVTT-QA, MSRVTT-MC and TVQA.
Our code and pretrained models are publicly available at: Github.
Figure 2: We progressively expand an image transformer baseline (eg. ViT) to a performant video-and-language (VidL) model. We do so by investigating the importance of many VidL design choices such as (1) temporal modeling, (2) multimodal fusion modules, (3) pretraining objectives, (4) the source of the pretraining data, (5) the number of pre-training frames, (6) multi-stage pretraining, and (7) scaling of the data and model. Each bar depicts an average text-to-video retrieval Recall@1,5,10 accuracy across MSR-VTT, DiDeMo, ActivityNet. The red bars denote the best-performing design choice in each subgroup. Our final VidL framework, dubbed VINDLU, outperforms our initial image Transformer baseline by 23.2%. The figure was inspired by ConvNeXt.