“The Statistical Properties of RCTs and a Proposal for Shrinkage”, Erik van Zwet, Simon Schwab, Stephen Senn2020-11-30 (, , ; backlinks; similar)⁠:

[van Zwet & Cator2020, van Zwet & Gelman2020] We abstract the concept of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) as a triple (β, b, s), where β is the primary efficacy parameter, b the estimate and s the standard error (s > 0). The parameter β is either a difference of means, a log odds ratio or a log hazard ratio. If we assume that b is unbiased and normally distributed, then we can estimate the full joint distribution of (β, b, s) from a sample of pairs (bi, si).

We have collected 23,747 such pairs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to do so. Here, we report the estimated distribution of the signal-to-noise ratio β⁄s and the achieved statistical power. We estimate the median achieved power to be 0.13. We also consider the exaggeration ratio which is the factor by which the magnitude of β is overestimated. We find that if the estimate is just statistically-significant at the 5% level, we would expect it to overestimate the true effect by a factor of 1.7.

This exaggeration is sometimes referred to as the winner’s curse and it is undoubtedly to a considerable extent responsible for disappointing replication results. For this reason, we believe it is important to shrink the unbiased estimator, and we propose a method for doing so.