It has recently been proposed that individual job performance follows a power law distribution (2012).
We present an argument and evidence for why the conclusion does not follow from the premises. We discuss the nature of generating mechanisms of statistical distributions, and compare the normal, log-normal, and Pareto distributions.
We review statistically principled methods of testing power-law distributions, and point out how it is necessary to compare them to a plausible alternative distribution ( et al 2009). We reiterate the importance of testing the assumptions of statistical models, and review the methods that are available to organizational researchers when the norm of normality is violated.
[Keywords: distribution theory, statistical assumptions, power laws]