“Fairness in Employment Testing: Validity Generalization, Minority Issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery”, John A. Hartigan, Alexandra K. Wigdor1989 (, ; backlinks; similar)⁠:

Declining American competitiveness in world economic markets has renewed interest in employment testing as a way of putting the right workers in the right jobs. A new study of the US Department of Labor’s General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) Referral System sheds light on key questions for America’s employers: How well does the GATB predict job success? Are there scientific justifications for adjusting minority test scores? Will increased use of the GATB result in substantial increases in productivity?

Fairness in Employment Testing evaluates both the validity generalization techniques used to justify the use of the GATB across the spectrum of US jobs and the policy of adjusting test scores to promote equal opportunity.


This volume is one of a number of studies conducted under the aegis of the National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences that deal with the use of standardized ability tests to make decisions about people in employment or educational settings. Because such tests have a sometimes important role in allocating opportunities in American society, their use is quite rightly subject to questioning and not infrequently to legal scrutiny. At issue in this report is the use of a federally sponsored employment test, the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB), to match job seekers to requests for job applicants from private-sector and public-sector employers. Developed in the late 1940s by the US Employment Service (USES), a division of the Department of Labor, the GATB is used for vocational counseling and job referral by state-administered Employment Service (also known as Job Service) offices located in some 1,800 communities around the country.


  1. The Policy Context

  2. Issues in Equity and Law

  3. The Public Employment Service

  4. The GATB: Its Character and Psychometric Properties

  5. Problematic Features of the GATB: Test Administration, Speedness, and Coachability

  6. The Theory of Validity Generalization

  7. Validity Generalization Applied to the GATB

  8. GATB Validities

  9. Differential Validity and Differential Prediction

  10. The VG-GATB Program: Concept, Promotion, and Implementation

  11. In Whose Interest: Potential Effects of the VG-GATB Referral System

  12. Evaluation of Economic Claims

  13. Recommendations for Referral and Score Reporting

  14. Central Recommendations