“‘Scientific Bias’ Tag”,2019-05-13 (depression, cognitive bias)⁠:

Bibliography for tag statistics/bias, most recent first: 4 related tags, 390 annotations, & 130 links (parent).

• See Also
• Gwern
  • “Against Caring About Subtle Poisons”, Gwern2023
  • “The Existential Risk of Math Errors”, Gwern2012
  • “Feynman’s Maze-Running Story”, Gwern2014
  • “Open Questions”, Gwern2018
  • “How Often Does Correlation=Causality?”, Gwern2014
  • “One Man’s Modus Ponens”, Gwern2012
  • “Littlewood’s Law and the Global Media”, Gwern2018
  • “Regression To The Mean Fallacies”, Gwern2021
  • “Does Mouse Utopia Exist?”, Gwern2019
  • “Leprechaun Hunting & Citogenesis”, Gwern2014
  • “Hydrocephalus and Intelligence: The Hollow Men”, Gwern2015
  • “Why Correlation Usually ≠ Causation”, Gwern2014
  • “The Replication Crisis: Flaws in Mainstream Science”, Gwern2010
  • “How Should We Critique Research?”, Gwern2019
  • “Dual n-Back Meta-Analysis”, Gwern2012
  • “Lunar Circadian Rhythms”, Gwern2013
  • “Lizardman Constant in Surveys”, Gwern2013
• Links
  • “The Rise of the Science Sleuths”
  • “The Global Pattern of Centenarians Highlights Deep Problems in Demography”, Newman2024
  • “Political Language In Economics”, Zubin et al 2024
  • “The Composer Has No Clothes”, Brown2024
  • “Revisiting the Relationship between Economic Freedom and Development to Account for Statistical Deception by Autocratic Regimes”, Alvarez et al 2024
  • “Delving into ChatGPT Usage in Academic Writing through Excess Vocabulary”, Kobak et al 2024
  • “For Chinese Students, the New Tactic Against AI Checks: More AI”, Qitong2024
  • “Paper Tiger? Chinese Science and Home Bias in Citations”, Qiu et al 2024
  • “Research Misconduct in China: towards an Institutional Analysis”, Zhang & Wang2024
  • “Epigenetic Age Oscillates during the Day”, Koncevičius et al 2024
  • “Is Economics Self-Correcting? Replications in the American Economic Review”, Ankel-Peters et al 2024
  • “Maternal Mortality in the United States: Are the High and Rising Rates due to Changes in Obstetrical Factors, Maternal Medical Conditions, or Maternal Mortality Surveillance?”, Joseph et al 2024
  • “Psychology Remains Marginally Valid”, Oktar2024
  • “Illusory Generalizability of Clinical Prediction Models”
  • “Heresy, Witchcraft, Jean Gerson, Scepticism and the Use of Placebo Controls”, Kirakosian et al 2023
  • “Prosocial Motives Underlie Scientific Censorship by Scientists: A Perspective and Research Agenda”, Clark et al 2023
  • “Published Benefits of Ivermectin Use in Itajaí, Brazil for COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality Are Entirely Explained by Statistical Artefacts”, Mills et al 2023
  • “A Quantitative Study of Inappropriate Image Duplication in the Journal Toxicology Reports”, David2023
  • “Indoctrination in Introduction to Psychology”, Bartels2023
  • “The Garden of Forking Paths; An Evaluation of Joseph’s ‘A Reevaluation of the 1990 Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart IQ Study’”, Bouchard2023
  • “Measuring Backsliding With Observables: Observable-To-Subjective Score Mapping (OSM)”, Weitzel et al 2023
  • “Empirical Design in Reinforcement Learning”, Patterson et al 2023
  • “Final Report of Investigation Committee Concerning Allegations against Professor Francesca Gino—Case RI21-001”, Amabile et al 2023
  • “Homeopathy Can Offer Empirical Insights on Treatment Effects in a Null Field”, Sigurdson et al 2023
  • “Positive Citation Bias and Over-Interpreted Results Lead to Misinformation on Common Mycorrhizal Networks in Forests”, Karst et al 2023
  • “Raising the Value of Research Studies in Psychological Science by Increasing the Credibility of Research Reports: the Transparent Psi Project”, Kekecs et al 2023
  • “A Discipline-Wide Investigation of the Replicability of Psychology Papers over the past Two Decades”, Youyou et al 2023
  • “How Do Psychology Researchers Interpret the Results of Multiple Replication Studies?”, Akker et al 2023
  • “Comparing Analysis Blinding With Preregistration in the Many-Analysts Religion Project”, Sarafoglou et al 2023
  • “#ReceptioGate and the (absolute) State of Academia: The Numbers Game Has Incentivized Bad Behavior”, Gauthier2023
  • “A Spotlight on Bias in the Growth Mindset Intervention Literature: A Reply to Commentaries That Contextualize the Discussion (Oyserman2023; Yan & Schuetze2023) and Illustrate the Conclusion (Tipton Et Al 2023)”, Macnamara & Burgoyne2023
  • “Positive Single-Center Randomized Trials and Subsequent Multicenter Randomized Trials in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review”, Kotani et al 2023
  • “Many Researchers Were Not Compliant With Their Published Data Sharing Statement: a Mixed-Methods Study”, Gabelica et al 2022
  • “The Future Failed: No Evidence for Precognition in a Large Scale Replication Attempt of Bem2011”, Muhmenthaler et al 2022
  • “Are Most Published Criminological Research Findings Wrong? Taking Stock of Criminological Research Using a Bayesian Simulation Approach”, Niemeyer et al 2022
  • “No Evidence That Mandatory Open Data Policies Increase Error Correction”, Berberi & Roche2022
  • “Inconvenient Truths and the Usefulness of Identifying Unknown Unknowns”, Gould & Georgiou2022
  • “Evaluating the Replicability of Social Priming Studies”, Giolla et al 2022
  • “Effects of Randomized Treatment With Icosapent Ethyl and a Mineral Oil Comparator on Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6, C-Reactive Protein, Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Homocysteine, Lipoprotein(a), and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2: A REDUCE-IT Biomarker Substudy”, Ridker et al 2022
  • “Is Psychological Science Self-Correcting? Citations Before and After Successful and Failed Replications”, Hippel2022
  • “Olfactory Exposure to Late-Pregnant and Lactating Mice Causes Stress-Induced Analgesia in Male Mice”, Rosen et al 2022
  • “The Impact of Digital Media on Children’s Intelligence While Controlling for Genetic Differences in Cognition and Socioeconomic Background”, Sauce et al 2022
  • “Do Multiple Experimenters Improve the Reproducibility of Animal Studies?”, Kortzfleisch et al 2022
  • “Theoretical False Positive Psychology”, Wilson et al 2022
  • “Does Democracy Matter?”, Gerring et al 2022
  • “‘I Think I Discovered a Military Base in the Middle of the Ocean’—Null Island, the Most Real of Fictional Places”, Juhasz & Mooney2022
  • “The Dunning-Kruger Effect Is Autocorrelation”
  • “Clinical Prediction Models in Psychiatry: a Systematic Review of Two Decades of Progress and Challenges”, Meehan et al 2022
  • “Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies Require Thousands of Individuals”, Marek et al 2022
  • “A 680,000-Person Megastudy of Nudges to Encourage Vaccination in Pharmacies”, Milkman et al 2022
  • “The Backfire Effect After Correcting Misinformation Is Strongly Associated With Reliability”, Swire-Thompson et al 2022
  • “Fooled by Beautiful Data: Visualization Esthetics Bias Trust in Science, News, and Social Media”, Lin & Thornton2022
  • “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Success of Blinding in Antidepressant RCTs”, Scott et al 2022
  • “Replication Crisis and Placebo Studies: Rebooting the Bioethical Debate”, Blease et al 2022
  • “Reproducibility in the Social Sciences”, Moody et al 2022
  • “The Efficacy of Psychotherapies and Pharmacotherapies for Mental Disorders in Adults: an Umbrella Review and Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Recent Meta-Analyses”, Leichsenring et al 2022
  • “How Malleable Are Cognitive Abilities? A Critical Perspective on Popular Brief Interventions”, Moreau2021
  • “More Treatment but No Less Depression: The Treatment-Prevalence Paradox”, Ormel et al 2021
  • “Megastudies Improve the Impact of Applied Behavioral Science”, Milkman et al 2021
  • “No Strong Evidence of Stereotype Threat in Females: A Reassessment of the Meta-Analysis”, Warne2021
  • “Metformin Treatment of Diverse Caenorhabditis Species Reveals the Importance of Genetic Background in Longevity and Healthspan Extension Outcomes”, Onken et al 2021
  • “The Psychophysiology of Political Ideology: Replications, Reanalyses, and Recommendations”, Osmundsen et al 2021
  • “Predict Science to Improve Science”, DellaVigna et al 2021
  • “The Predicament of Establishing Persistence: Slavery and Human Capital in Africa”, Malik & Bouaroudj2021
  • “The Implicit Association Test in Introductory Psychology Textbooks: Blind Spot for Controversy”, Bartels & Schoenrade2021
  • “A Pre-Registered, Multi-Lab Non-Replication of the Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE)”, Morey et al 2021
  • “Are Conservatives More Rigid Than Liberals? A Meta-Analytic Test of the Rigidity-Of-The-Right Hypothesis”, Costello et al 2021
  • “Empirical Audit and Review and an Assessment of Evidentiary Value in Research on the Psychological Consequences of Scarcity”, O’Donnell et al 2021
  • “Effect Sizes Reported in Highly Cited Emotion Research Compared With Larger Studies and Meta-Analyses Addressing the Same Questions”, Cristea et al 2021
  • “The Role of Human Fallibility in Psychological Research: A Survey of Mistakes in Data Management”, Kovacs et al 2021
  • “On the Reliability of Published Findings Using the Regression Discontinuity Design in Political Science”, Stommes et al 2021
  • “Is Coffee the Cause or the Cure? Conflicting Nutrition Messages in 2 Decades of Online New York Times’ Nutrition News Coverage”, Ihekweazu2021
  • “Causal and Associational Linking Language From Observational Research and Health Evaluation Literature in Practice: A Systematic Language Evaluation”, Haber et al 2021
  • “TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results From 288 Brands”, Shapiro et al 2021
  • “Systematic Bias in the Progress of Research”, Rubin & Rubin2021
  • “Common Elective Orthopaedic Procedures and Their Clinical Effectiveness: Umbrella Review of Level 1 Evidence”, Blom et al 2021
  • “Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science”, Götz et al 2021
  • “The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies”, Matthay et al 2021
  • “The Piranha Problem: Large Effects Swimming in a Small Pond”, Tosh et al 2021
  • “Challenging the Link Between Early Childhood Television Exposure and Later Attention Problems: A Multiverse Approach”, McBee et al 2021
  • “The Influence of Hidden Researcher Decisions in Applied Microeconomics”, Huntington-Klein et al 2021
  • “Man-Bites-Dog Contagion: Disproportionate Diffusion of Information about Rare Categories of Events”, Jang & Shore2021
  • “Therapygenetic Effects of 5-HTTLPR on Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis”, Schiele et al 2021
  • “Maximal Positive Controls: A Method for Estimating the Largest Plausible Effect Size”, Hilgard2021
  • “Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-Of-Confidence Project”, Rohrer et al 2021
  • “Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: What Is Realistic, What Are Illusions? Part 1: Ways to Make an Impact, and Why We Are Not There Yet: Quality Is More Important Than Speed and Cost in Drug Discovery”, Bender & Cortés-Ciriano2021
  • “When the Numbers Do Not Add Up: The Practical Limits of Stochastologicals for Soft Psychology”, Broers2021
  • “Honest Signaling in Academic Publishing”, Tiokhin et al 2021
  • “So Useful As a Good Theory? The Practicality Crisis in (Social) Psychological Theory”, Berkman & Wilson2021
  • “Comment by Peter Norvig on “Being Good at Programming Competitions Correlates Negatively With Being Good on the Job””, Norvig2020
  • “The Statistical Properties of RCTs and a Proposal for Shrinkage”, Zwet et al 2020
  • “Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review As an Intervention to Increase Replicability”, Ebersole et al 2020
  • “The Reproducibility of Statistical Results in Psychological Research: An Investigation Using Unpublished Raw Data”, Artner et al 2020
  • “Psychological Measurement and the Replication Crisis: Four Sacred Cows”, Lilienfeld & Strother2020
  • “Cite Unseen: Theory and Evidence on the Effect of Open Access on Cites to Academic Articles Across the Quality Spectrum”, McCabe & Snyder2020
  • “Heterogeneity in Direct Replications in Psychology and Its Association With Effect Size”, Olsson-Collentine et al 2020
  • “A Replication Crisis in Methodological Research?”, Boulesteix et al 2020
  • “The Small Effects of Political Advertising Are Small regardless of Context, Message, Sender, or Receiver: Evidence from 59 Real-Time Randomized Experiments”, Coppock et al 2020
  • “Towards Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies”, Marek et al 2020
  • “Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully”, Hoogeveen et al 2020
  • “Specification Curve Analysis”, Simonsohn et al 2020
  • “Can Short Psychological Interventions Affect Educational Performance? Revisiting the Effect of Self-Affirmation Interventions”, Serra-Garcia et al 2020
  • “The Multiverse of Methods: Extending the Multiverse Analysis to Address Data-Collection Decisions”, Harder2020
  • “How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration”, Cowan et al 2020
  • “What Is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-Functional MRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis”, Elliott et al 2020
  • “Health Recommendations and Selection in Health Behaviors”, Oster2020
  • “Variability in the Analysis of a Single Neuroimaging Dataset by Many Teams”, Botvinik-Nezer et al 2020
  • “Supercentenarian and Remarkable Age Records Exhibit Patterns Indicative of Clerical Errors and Pension Fraud”, Newman2020
  • “Bilingualism Affords No General Cognitive Advantages: A Population Study of Executive Function in 11,000 People”, Nichols et al 2020
  • “Statistics As Squid Ink: How Prominent Researchers Can Get Away With Misrepresenting Data”, Gelman & Guzey2020
  • “Ideological Diversity, Hostility, and Discrimination in Philosophy”, Peters et al 2020
  • “On Attenuated Interactions, Measurement Error, and Statistical Power: Guidelines for Social and Personality Psychologists”, Blake & Gangestad2020
  • “A Controlled Trial for Reproducibility: For Three Years, Part of DARPA Has Funded Two Teams for Each Project: One for Research and One for Reproducibility. The Investment Is Paying Off.”, Raphael et al 2020
  • “What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from 4 Economics Journals”, Card & DellaVigna2020
  • “Foreign Language Learning in Older Age Does Not Improve Memory or Intelligence: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Study”, Berggren et al 2020
  • “The Stewart Retractions: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis”, Pickett2020
  • “Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning”, Raff2020
  • “Compliance With Legal Requirement to Report Clinical Trial Results on ClinicalTrials.gov: a Cohort Study”, DeVito et al 2020
  • “Implications of Ideological Bias in Social Psychology on Clinical Practice”, Silander et al 2020
  • “Cognitive and Academic Benefits of Music Training With Children: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis”, Sala & Gobet2020
  • “What Intellectual Progress Did I Make In The 2010s?”, Alexander2020
  • “Blinding to Remove Biases in Science and Society”, MacCoun2020
  • “Why the Increasing Use of Complex Causal Models Is a Problem: On the Danger Sophisticated Theoretical Narratives Pose to Truth”, Saylors & Trafimow2020
  • “Estimating the Deep Replicability of Scientific Findings Using Human and Artificial Intelligence”, Yang et al 2020
  • “Lack of Evidence for Associative Learning in Pea Plants”, Markel2020
  • “Self-Reported Health without Clinically Measurable Benefits among Adult Users of Multivitamin and Multimineral Supplements: a Cross-Sectional Study”, Paranjpe et al 2020
  • “Do Police Killings of Unarmed Persons Really Have Spillover Effects? Reanalyzing Bor Et Al 2018”, Nix & Lozada2019
  • “Catching Cheating Students”, Lin & Levitt2019
  • “Why We Sleep Data Manipulation: A Smoking Gun?”, Gelman2019
  • “Whassup With Why We Sleep?”, Gelman2019
  • “Comparing Meta-Analyses and Preregistered Multiple-Laboratory Replication Projects”, Kvarven et al 2019
  • “Why We Sleep Update: Some Thoughts While We Wait for Matthew Walker to Respond to Alexey Guzey’s Criticisms”, Gelman2019
  • “Flexible yet Fair: Blinding Analyses in Experimental Psychology”, Dutilh et al 2019
  • “Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting”, Klein et al 2019
  • “Is Matthew Walker’s Why We Sleep Riddled With Scientific and Factual Errors?”, Gelman2019
  • “[Comment on Guzey Post]”, Kinkajoe2019
  • “Matthew Walker’s Why We Sleep Is Riddled With Scientific and Factual Errors”, Guzey2019
  • “Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials”, Zeraatkar et al 2019
  • “Anthropology’s Science Wars: Insights from a New Survey”, Horowitz et al 2019
  • “A National Experiment Reveals Where a Growth Mindset Improves Achievement”, Yeager et al 2019
  • “Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment”, Texier2019
  • “The Architectural Bias in Current Biblical Archaeology”, Ben-Yosef2019
  • “The Maddening Saga of How an Alzheimer’s ‘Cabal’ Thwarted Progress toward a Cure for Decades”, Begley2019
  • “Exploring Research-Methods Blogs in Psychology: Who Posts What About Whom, and With What Effect?”, Nicolas et al 2019
  • “Generalizable and Robust TV Advertising Effects”, Shapiro et al 2019
  • “Meta-Research: A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Clinical Trials in Three Medical Journals Reveals 396 Medical Reversals”, Herrera-Perez et al 2019
  • “The Hype Cycle of Working Memory Training”, Redick2019
  • “Statistical Methods for Replicability Assessment”, Hung & Fithian2019
  • “Rigorous Large-Scale Educational RCTs Are Often Uninformative: Should We Be Concerned?”, Lortie-Forgues & Inglis2019
  • “What Can We Learn from Many Labs Replications? 3. Can Replication Studies Detect Fraud?”, Stroebe2019
  • “Citogenesis: the Serious Circular Reporting Problem Wikipedians Are Fighting. Circular Reporting Is a Real Problem on Platforms like Wikipedia—And It’s Harder to Solve Than It Looks”, Harrison2019
  • “Orchestrating False Beliefs about Gender Discrimination”, Pallesen2019
  • “On the Estimation of Treatment Effects With Endogenous Misreporting”, Nguimkeu et al 2019
  • “Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology”, Wu et al 2019
  • “The Advantages of Bilingualism Debate”, Antoniou2019
  • “How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project”, Soto2019
  • “A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Money Priming”, Lodder et al 2019
  • “No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-By-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples”, Border et al 2019
  • “Why Is Nonadherence to Cancer Screening Associated With Increased Mortality?”, Association2018
  • “Association of Non-Adherence to Cancer Screening Examinations With Mortality From Unrelated Causes: A Secondary Analysis of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial”, Pierre-Victor & Pinsky2018
  • “Mesmerising Science: The Franklin Commission and the Modern Clinical Trial”, Laukaityte2018
  • “Generalizability of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimates across Samples”, Coppock et al 2018
  • “Predicting Replication Outcomes in the Many Labs 2 Study”, Forsell et al 2018
  • “Deterministic Implementations for Reproducibility in Deep Reinforcement Learning”, Nagarajan et al 2018
  • “Effects of the Tennessee Prekindergarten Program on Children’s Achievement and Behavior through Third Grade”, Lipsey et al 2018
  • “Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science 2010^–₅2015”, Camerer et al 2018
  • “Statistical Paradises and Paradoxes in Big Data (1): Law of Large Populations, Big Data Paradox, and the 2016 US Presidential Election”, Meng2018
  • “Disentangling Bias and Variance in Election Polls”, Shirani-Mehr et al 2018
  • “Propagation of Mistakes in Papers”, Neumann2018
  • “Causal Language and Strength of Inference in Academic and Media Articles Shared in Social Media (CLAIMS): A Systematic Review”, Haber et al 2018
  • “Acceptable Losses: the Debatable Origins of Loss Aversion”, Yechiam2018
  • “A Real-Life Lord of the Flies: the Troubling Legacy of the Robbers Cave Experiment; In the Early 1950s, the Psychologist Muzafer Sherif Brought Together a Group of Boys at a US Summer Camp—And Tried to Make Them Fight Each Other. Does His Work Teach Us Anything about Our Age of Resurgent Tribalism? [An Extract from The Lost Boys]”, Shariatmadari2018
  • “Homogenous: The Political Affiliations of Elite Liberal Arts College Faculty”, Langbert2018
  • “”Are You Gonna Publish That?” Peer-Reviewed Publication Outcomes of Doctoral Dissertations in Psychology”, Evans et al 2018
  • “Knowing What We Are Getting: Evaluating Scientific Research on the International Space Station”, Bianco & Schmidt2017
  • “The Prehistory of Biology Preprints: A Forgotten Experiment from the 1960s”, Cobb2017
  • “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Angina (ORBITA): a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial”, Al-Lamee et al 2017
  • “The Power of Bias in Economics Research”, Ioannidis et al 2017
  • “Deep Reinforcement Learning That Matters”, Henderson et al 2017
  • “Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agents”, Machado et al 2017
  • “Does Diversity Pay? A Replication of Herring2009”, Stojmenovska et al 2017
  • “Impossibly Hungry Judges”, Lakens2017
  • “How Gullible Are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Science”, Mercier2017
  • “Avoiding Erroneous Citations in Ecological Research: Read Before You Apply”, Šigut et al 2017
  • “Coverage of Rosenhan’s ‘On Being Sane in Insane Places’ in Abnormal Psychology Textbooks”, Bartels & Peters2017
  • “Roosevelt Predicted to Win: Revisiting the 1936 Literary Digest Poll”, Lohr & Brick2017
  • “Laboratory Environmental Factors and Pain Behavior: the Relevance of Unknown Unknowns to Reproducibility and Translation”, Mogil2017
  • “Empirical Assessment of Published Effect Sizes and Power in the Recent Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology Literature”, Szucs & Ioannidis2017
  • “Blind Analysis As a Correction for Confirmatory Bias in Physics and in Psychology”, MacCoun & Perlmutter2017
  • “When the Music’s Over. Does Music Skill Transfer to Children’s and Young Adolescents’ Cognitive and Academic Skills? A Meta-Analysis”, Sala & Gobet2017
  • “Meta-Assessment of Bias in Science”
  • “Does Teaching Children How to Play Cognitively Demanding Games Improve Their Educational Attainment? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Chess Instruction in England”, jerrim 2017
  • “Potential Contribution of Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Factors to Healthy User Bias in Anti-Hypertensives and Lipid-Lowering Drugs”, Kinjo et al 2017
  • “What Does Any of This Have To Do With Physics? Einstein and Feynman Ushered Me into Grad School, Reality Ushered Me Out”, Henderson2016
  • “Rational Judges, Not Extraneous Factors In Decisions”, Stafford2016
  • “Responses to Critiques on Machine Learning of Criminality Perceptions (Addendum of ArXiv:1611_413ya.04135)”, Wu & Zhang2016
  • “A Replication and Methodological Critique of the Study ‘Evaluating Drug Trafficking on the Tor Network’”, Munksgaard et al 2016
  • “How Multiple Imputation Makes a Difference”, Lall2016
  • “Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder Than You Think”, Westfall & Yarkoni2016
  • “Reading ‘The Baby Factory’ in Context”, Srivastava2016
  • “When Quality Beats Quantity: Decision Theory, Drug Discovery, and the Reproducibility Crisis”, Scannell & Bosley2016
  • “The Baby Factory: Difficult Research Objects, Disciplinary Standards, and the Production of Statistical-Significance”, Peterson2016
  • “Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science”, Boudreau et al 2016
  • “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”, Collaboration2015
  • “The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research”, Freedman et al 2015
  • “Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time”, Kaplan & Irvin2015
  • “Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results”, Simonsohn2015
  • “Scholarly Context Not Found: One in Five Articles Suffers from Reference Rot”, Klein et al 2014
  • “The Corrupted Epidemiological Evidence Base of Psychiatry: A Key Driver of Over-Diagnosis”, Raven2014
  • “Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-Analyses”, Dechartres et al 2014
  • “Practice Does Not Make Perfect: No Causal Effect of Music Practice on Music Ability”, Mosing et al 2014
  • “Deliberate Practice: Is That All It Takes to Become an Expert?”, Hambrick et al 2014
  • “Olfactory Exposure to Males, including Men, Causes Stress and Related Analgesia in Rodents”, Sorge et al 2014
  • “The Control Group Is Out Of Control”, Alexander2014
  • “Trap of Trends to Statistical-Significance: Likelihood of Near-Statistically-Significant p-Values Becoming More Statistically-Significant With Extra Data”, Wood et al 2014
  • “The Chrysalis Effect: How Ugly Initial Results Metamorphosize Into Beautiful Articles”, O’Boyle et al 2014
  • “Identifying The Effect Of Open Access On Citations Using A Panel Of Science Journals”, McCabe & Snyder2014
  • “p-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer”, Simonsohn et al 2014
  • “Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised”, Andreoli-Versbach & Mueller-Langer2014
  • “Use of Placebo Controls in the Evaluation of Surgery: Systematic Review”, Wartolowska2014
  • “Too Much Success for Recent Groundbreaking Epigenetic Experiments”, Francis2014
  • “Predictors and Moderators of Agreement between Clinical and Research Diagnoses for Children and Adolescents”, Jensen-Doss et al 2014
  • “The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly With Article Age”, Vines et al 2013
  • “The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology: Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects”, Boot et al 2013
  • “Lizardman’s Constant Is 4%”, Alexander2013
  • “Investing in Preschool Programs”, Duncan & Magnuson2013
  • “A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the Clinic”, Mobley et al 2013
  • “Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back”, Brodeur et al 2013
  • “Empirical Estimates Suggest Most Published Medical Research Is True”, Jager & Leek2013
  • “What’s to Know about the Credibility of Empirical Economics?”, Ioannidis & Doucouliagos2013
  • “The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There Is No `fishing Expedition` or `p-Hacking` and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited ahead of Time”, Gelman & Loken2013
  • “Investigating Variation in Replicability: The `Many Labs` Replication Project”, Klein2013
  • “Randomized Controlled Trials Commissioned by the Institute of Education Sciences Since 2002: How Many Found Positive Versus Weak or No Effects?”, Policy2013
  • “A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices”, Prasad2013
  • “The Data Vigilante”
  • “Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel”, Committee et al 2012
  • “Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science”, Stroebe et al 2012
  • “A Peculiar Prevalence of p Values Just below 0.05”, Masicampo & Lalande2012
  • “The Iron Law Of Evaluation And Other Metallic Rules”, Rossi2012
  • “Depressive Realism: A Meta-Analytic Review”, Moore & Fresco2012
  • “Correlation and Causation in the Study of Personality”, Lee2012
  • “How Near-Miss Events Amplify or Attenuate Risky Decision Making”, Tinsley et al 2012
  • “Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth-Telling”, John et al 2012
  • “The Ironic Effect of Significant Results on the Credibility of Multiple-Study Articles”, Schimmack2012
  • “Chocolate Consumption, Cognitive Function, and Nobel Laureates”, Messerli2012
  • “Compliance With Mandatory Reporting of Clinical Trial Results on ClinicalTrials.gov: Cross Sectional Study”, Prayle2012
  • “Most Reported Genetic Associations With General Intelligence Are Probably False Positives”, Chabris et al 2012
  • “Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results”, Wicherts et al 2011
  • “Statistically-Significant Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials Have Modest Credibility and Inflated Effects”, Pereira & Ioannidis2011
  • “Negative Results Are Disappearing from Most Disciplines and Countries”, Fanelli2011
  • “Artifact and Recording Concepts in EEG”, Tatum et al 2011
  • “Notes on a New Philosophy of Empirical Science”, Burfoot2011
  • “Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals”, Ma et al 2011
  • “Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect”, Bem2011
  • “Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments”, Levitt & List2011
  • “BCR Fall 2011_full”, Garnier2011
  • “Excess Statistical-Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities”, Ioannidis2011
  • “The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias”, Lewis2011
  • “Erroneous Analyses of Interactions in Neuroscience: a Problem of Statistical-Significance”, Nieuwenhuis2011
  • “Peer-Review in a World With Rational Scientists: Toward Selection of the Average”, Thurner & Hanel2010
  • “Japan, Checking on Its Oldest, Finds Many Gone”
  • “On Rustles, Wolf Interpretations, and Other Wild Speculations”, Navon2010
  • “‘Positive’ Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences”, Fanelli2010
  • “Chinese Journal Finds 31% of Submissions Plagiarized”, Zhang2010
  • “Holiday Reading: Cigarette Smoking: an Underused Tool in High-Performance Endurance Training”, Myers2010
  • “Placebo Interventions for All Clinical Conditions”, Hróbjartsson & Gøtzsche2010
  • “Rewriting History”, Ljungqvist et al 2009
  • “Large-Scale Assessment of the Effect of Popularity on the Reliability of Research”, Pfeiffer & Hoffmann2009
  • “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data”, Fanelli2009
  • “When Superstars Flop: Public Status and Choking Under Pressure in International Soccer Penalty Shootouts”, Jordet2009
  • “Producing Wrong Data Without Doing Anything Obviously Wrong!”, Mytkowicz et al 2009
  • “Statin Adherence and Risk of Accidents: a Cautionary Tale”, Dormuth et al 2009
  • “Models for Potentially Biased Evidence in Meta-Analysis Using Empirically Based Priors”, Welton et al 2008
  • “Killing For Their Country: A New Look at ’Killology’”, Engen2008
  • “Probing the Improbable: Methodological Challenges for Risks With Low Probabilities and High Stakes”, Ord et al 2008
  • “Figureheads, Ghost-Writers and Pseudonymous Quant Bloggers: The Recent Evolution of Authorship in Science Publishing”, Charlton2008
  • “Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated”, Ioannidis2008
  • “The Allure of Equality: Uniformity in Probabilistic and Statistical Judgment”, Falk & Lann2008
  • “Lost in Publication: How Measurement Harms Science”, Lawrence2008
  • “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration”, Vandenbroucke et al 2007
  • “A Mathematical Theory of Citing”, Simkin & Roychowdhury2007
  • “Proceeding From Observed Correlation to Causal Inference: The Use of Natural Experiments”, Rutter2007
  • “Meditation Practices for Health: State of the Research”, Center2007
  • “Testing Multiple Statistical Hypotheses Resulted in Spurious Associations: a Study of Astrological Signs and Health”, Austin et al 2006
  • “Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect of Sweet Cough Syrups”, Eccles2006
  • “Lessons from the JMCB Archive”, McCullough et al 2006
  • “Comparison of Evidence on Harms of Medical Interventions in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies”, Papanikolaou et al 2006
  • “Evidence of Bias in Estimates of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Seniors”, Jackson et al 2005
  • “Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research”, Ioannidis2005
  • “Blind Analysis In Nuclear And Particle Physics”, Klein & Roodman2005
  • “Experimenter Effects and the Remote Detection of Staring”, Wiseman & Schlitz2005
  • “An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Statistical-Significance Tests”, Killeen2005
  • “When Is a Correlation between Non-Independent Variables ‘Spurious’?”, Brett2004
  • “S. L. A. Marshall’s Men against Fire: New Evidence regarding Fire Ratios”, II 2003
  • “Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, Or Healthier Lifestyles?”, Baumeister et al 2003
  • “Personal Reflections on Lessons Learned from Randomized Trials Involving Newborn Infants, 1951^–₁₆1967_57ya”, Silverman2003
  • “C:/ncn/bre587”
  • “Effects of Remote, Retroactive Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients With Bloodstream Infection: Randomized Controlled Trial”, Leibovici2001
  • “The Hazards of Predicting Divorce Without Crossvalidation”, Heyman & Slep2001
  • “Beleaguered Pygmalion: A History of the Controversy Over Claims That Teacher Expectancy Raises Intelligence”, Spitz1999
  • “Controlled Trials: the 1948 Watershed”, Doll1998
  • “Applications of Randomness in System Performance Measurement”, Blackwell1998
  • “The Unpredictability Paradox: Review of Empirical Comparisons of Randomized and Non-Randomized Clinical Trials”, Kunz & Oxman1998
  • “The Science of Murphy’s Law: Life’s Little Annoyances Are Not As Random As They Seem: the Awful Truth Is That the Universe Is against You”, Matthews1997
  • “Trends in Science Coverage: a Content Analysis of 3 US Newspapers”, Pellechia1997
  • “The Rise and Fall of Uncitedness”, Schwartz1997
  • “The T-Experiments: Errors in Scientific Software”, Hatton1997
  • “The ‘File Drawer Problem’ of Non-Significant Results: Does It Apply to Biological Research?”
  • “The Social Misconstruction of Reality: Validity and Verification in the Scholarly Community”, Hamilton1996
  • “The Big Crunch”, Goodstein1994
  • “The Efficacy of Psychological, Educational, and Behavioral Treatment: Confirmation from Meta-Analysis”, Lipsey & Wilson1993
  • “The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality”, Koehler1993
  • “On Being a Whistleblower: The Needleman Case”, Ernhart et al 1993
  • “How a Publicity Blitz Created The Myth of Subliminal Advertising”, Rogers1992
  • “Statistics As Rhetoric in Psychology”, John1992
  • “The Crisis in Measurement Literacy in Psychology and Education”, Lambert1991
  • “What’s Wrong With Psychology Anyway?”, Lykken1991
  • “Possible Inaccuracies Occurring in Citation Analysis”, Moed & Vriens1989
  • “Methods for Studying Coincidences”, Diaconis & Mosteller1989
  • “Walter Stewart: Fighting Fraud in Science (They Call Him the ‘terrorist of the Lab’, but This Self-Appointed Scourge of Scientific Fraud Has Reason to Suspect That As Much As 25% of All Research Papers May Be Intentionally Fudged) [Interview]”, Stewart & Stewart1989
  • “About Face: The Odyssey of an American Warrior § S. L. A. Marshall (SLAM)”, Hackworth & Sherman1989 (page 37)
  • “Informal Conceptions of Probability”
  • “Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science”, Rosnow & Rosenthal1989
  • “Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants”, Henrion & Fischhoff1986
  • “Magnitude of Teacher Expectancy Effects on Pupil IQ As a Function of the Credibility of Expectancy Induction: A Synthesis of Findings from 18 Experiments”, Raudenbush1984
  • “The Citation Bias: Fad and Fashion in the Judgment and Decision Literature”, Christensen-Szalanski & Beach1984
  • “An Investigation of the Validity of Bibliographic Citations”, Broadus1983
  • “Taboo, Constraint, and Responsibility in Educational Research”, Jensen1983b
  • “Fake!”, Hamblin1981
  • “Rating the Ratings: Assessing the Psychometric Quality of Rating Data”, Saal et al 1980
  • “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices”, Peter1979
  • “Consumer Research: How Valid and Useful Are All Our Consumer Behavior Research Findings?: A State-Of-The-Art Review”, Jacoby1978
  • “What Is Not What in Statistics”, Guttman1977
  • Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research: Enlarged Edition, Rosenthal1976
  • “Critical Analysis of the Statistical and Ethical Implications of Various Definitions of ’Test Bias’”, Hunter & Schmidt1976
  • “Comparative Studies of Psychotherapies: Is It True That “Everyone Has Won and All Must Have Prizes”?”, Luborsky et al 1975
  • “Editorial [EJP Editorial on Registered Reports]”, Johnson1975b
  • “Models of Control and Control of Bias”, Johnson1975
  • “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Granger & Newbold1974
  • Social Sciences As Sorcery, Andreski1973
  • “Social Psychology As History”, Gergen1973
  • “Interpreting Regression toward the Mean in Developmental Research”, Furby1973
  • “Pygmalion Reconsidered: A Case Study in Statistical Inference: Reconsideration of the Rosenthal-Jacobson Data on Teacher Expectancy”, Elashoff & Snow1971
  • “Nuisance Variables and the Ex Post Facto Design”, Meehl1970
  • “Pygmalion In The Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupil’s Intellectual Development”, Rosenthal & Jacobson1968
  • “Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox”, Meehl1967
  • “Control of Spurious Association and the Reliability of the Controlled Variable”, Kahneman1965
  • “Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent? Yes; It Misrepresents Scientific Thought”, Medawar1964
  • “Responsibility for Raw Data”, Wolins1962
  • “Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD-25): Xv. the Effects Produced By Substitution of a Tap Water Placebo”, Abramson et al 1955
  • “Evaluating the Effect of Inadequately Measured Variables in Partial Correlation Analysis”, Stouffer1936
  • “Halo Effect: A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings”, Thorndike1920
  • “The Impersonator: The Fake Data Were Coming From Inside the Lab”
  • “After Century of Removing Appendixes, Docs Find Antibiotics Can Be Enough: In a Five-Year Follow-Up, Nearly Two-Thirds of Patients Never Needed Surgery”
  • “The High Cost of Not Doing Experiments”
  • “Metacritic Has A (File-Drawer) Problem”
  • “Help, Doctor, I’Ve Been Exposed to [Proprietary]!”
  • “Alexey Guzey’s Homepage”, Guzey2024
  • “Open Science Challenges, Benefits and Tips in Early Career and Beyond”, Allen & Mehler2024
  • “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration”, Liberati et al 2024
  • “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”, Ioannidis2024
  • “Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way”, Moonesinghe et al 2024
  • “How to Make More Published Research True”, Ioannidis2024
  • “Does Far Transfer Exist? Negative Evidence From Chess, Music, and Working Memory Training”
  • “The Journal of Scientific Integrity [Fraud in Honeybee Communication Research]”
  • “WTH Is Cerebrolysin, Actually?”
  • “Misconduct in Bioscience Research: a 40-Year Perspective”
  • “Evaluating Extraordinary Claims: Mind Over Matter? Or Mind Over Mind?”
  • “Replications of Marketing Studies”
  • “Publication Bias in the Stereotype Threat Literature”
  • “On the Science and Ethics of Ebola Treatments”
  • “My IRB Nightmare”
  • “Book Review: The 7 Principles For Making Marriage Work”
  • “A Catastrophic Failure of Peer Review in Obstetrics and Gynaecology”
  • “The Psychology of Parapsychology, or Why Good Researchers Publishing Good Articles in Good Journals Can Still Get It Totally Wrong”
  • “Massive Lykos and MAPS Layoffs amid FDA Rejection Reactions; 3 MDMA Papers Retracted; and False Insights”
  • “The Secret Of The Soldiers Who Didn’t Shoot”
  • “More Than 230,000 Japanese Centenarians ‘Missing’”
  • “Surely You Can Be Serious”, Mastroianni2024
  • “Computational Analysis of Lifespan Experiment Reproducibility”
  • “How Much Should We Trust Developing Country GDP? [Little]”
  • “Inventing the Randomized Double-Blind Trial: The Nürnberg Salt Test of 1835”
  • “Wikipedia Shapes Language in Science Papers: Experiment Traces How Online Encyclopaedia Influences Research Write-Ups”
  • “Diederik Stapel’s Audacious Academic Fraud”
  • “A Primer on Why Microbiome Research Is Hard”
  • “The Academic Culture of Fraud”
  • “How Many American Women Die From Causes Related to Pregnancy or Childbirth? No One Knows.”
  • “Do Drugs Make Religious Experience Possible? They Did for James and for Other Philosopher-Mystics of His Day. James’s Experiments With Psychoactive Drugs Raise Difficult Questions about Belief and Its Conditions”
  • “Do Life Hacks Work? The Truth Is, We’ll Never Know”
  • “Cancer Studies Are Fatally Flawed. Meet the Young Billionaire [John Arnold] Who’s Exposing the Truth About Bad Science”
  • Sort By Magic
    • citation-bias
    • data-quality
    • reproducibility
  • Wikipedia
• Miscellaneous
• Bibliography