“Occupational Characteristics Moderate Personality-Performance Relations in Major Occupational Groups”, Michael P. Wilmot, Deniz S. Ones2021-12-01 (, ; similar)⁠:

Personality predicts performance, but the moderating influence of occupational characteristics on its performance relations remains under-examined. Accordingly, we conduct second-order meta-analyses of the Big Five traits and occupational performance (ie. supervisory ratings of overall job performance or objective performance outcomes).

We identify 15 meta-analyses reporting 47 effects for 9 major occupational groups (clerical, customer service, healthcare, law enforcement, management, military, professional, sales, and skilled/semiskilled), which represent n = 89,639 workers across k = 539 studies. We also integrate data from the Occupational Information Network (O✱NET) concerning 2 occupational characteristics: (1) expert ratings of Big Five trait relevance to its occupational requirements; and (2) its level of occupational complexity.

We report 3 major findings:

  1. First, relations differ considerably across major occupational groups.

    Conscientiousness predicts across all groups, but other traits have higher validities when they are more relevant to occupational requirements: Agreeableness for healthcare; Emotional Stability for skilled/semiskilled, law enforcement, and military; Extraversion for sales and management; and Openness for professional.

  2. Second, expert ratings of trait relevance mostly converge with empirical relations.

    For 77% of occupational groups, the top-2 most highly rated traits match the top-2 most highly predictive traits.

  3. Third, occupational complexity moderates personality-performance relations.

    When groups are ranked by complexity, multiple correlations generally follow an inverse-U shaped pattern, which suggests that moderate complexity levels may be a “Goldilocks range” for personality prediction.

Altogether, results demonstrate that occupational characteristics are important, if often overlooked, contextual variables. We close by discussing implications of findings for research, practice, and policy.

[Keywords: personality, occupational characteristics, occupational requirements, occupational relevance, occupational complexity, second-order meta-analysis, O✱NET]