“Intersectional Implicit Bias: Evidence for Asymmetrically Compounding Bias and the Predominance of Target Gender”, 2022-05-19 ():
[appendix] Little is known about implicit evaluations of complex, multiply categorizable social targets.
Across 5 studies (n = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of targets varying in race, gender, social class, and age.
Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was pro-women/anti-men bias, followed by smaller but nonetheless consistent pro-upper-class/anti-lower-class biases. By contrast, we observed less consistent effects of targets’ race, no effects of targets’ age, and no consistent interactions between target-level categories.
An integrative data analysis highlighted a number of moderating factors, but a stable pro-women/anti-men and pro-upper-class/anti-lower-class bias across demographic groups.
Overall, these results suggest that implicit biases compound across multiple categories asymmetrically, with a dominant category (here, gender) largely driving evaluations, and ancillary categories (here, social class and race) exerting relatively smaller additional effects. We discuss potential implications of this work for understanding how implicit biases operate in real-world social settings.
[Keywords: implicit bias, intersectionality, social class, person perception, social cognition]
See Also:
What Can Experimental Studies of Bias Tell Us About Real-World Group Disparities?
The Implicit Association Test in Introductory Psychology Textbooks: Blind Spot for Controversy
Answering Unresolved Questions About the Relationship Between Cognitive Ability and Prejudice
Boys lag behind: How teachers’ gender biases affect student achievement
Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis