“You Don’t Have to Believe Everything You Read: Background Knowledge Permits Fast and Efficient Validation of Information”, 2009 (; backlinks; similar):
In social cognition, knowledge-based validation of information is usually regarded as relying on strategic and resource-demanding processes. Research on language comprehension, in contrast, suggests that validation processes are involved in the construction of a referential representation of the communicated information. This view implies that individuals can use their knowledge to validate incoming information in a routine and efficient manner.
Consistent with this idea, Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that individuals are able to reject false assertions efficiently when they have validity-relevant beliefs. Validation processes were carried out routinely even when individuals were put under additional cognitive load during comprehension. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the rejection of false information occurs automatically and interferes with affirmative responses in a nonsemantic task (epistemic Stroop effect). Experiment 4 also revealed complementary interference effects of true information with negative responses in a nonsemantic task.
These results suggest the existence of fast and efficient validation processes that protect mental representations from being contaminated by false and inaccurate information.
[Keywords: beliefs, comprehension, situation model, truth value, validation]