[This is one of the finalists in the 2024 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done. I’ll be posting about one of these a week for several months. When you’ve read them all, I’ll ask you to vote for a favorite, so remember which ones you liked]
I had been living in Japan for a year before I got the idea to look up whose portraits were on the banknotes I was handling every day. In the United States, the faces of presidents and statesmen adorn our currency. So I was surprised to learn that the mustachioed man on the ¥1,000 note with which I purchased my daily bento box was a bacteriologist. It was a pleasant surprise, though. It seems to me that a society that esteems bacteriologists over politicians is in many ways a healthy one.
But it was the lofty gaze of the man on the ¥10,000 note that really caught my attention. I find that always having a spare ¥10,000 note is something of a necessity in Japan. You never know when you might stumble upon a pop-up artisanal sake kiosk beside a metro station staircase that only accepts cash and only opens one day a year. So over the course of my time in Japan I had come to know the face of the man on that bill rather well.
In his portrait, gracefully curled back hair and expressive eyebrows sit above two wide eyes that communicate a kind of amused resignation. It is the face of someone watching from afar as a trivial misunderstanding blossoms into a full-fledged argument.
His name, I learned, was Yukichi Fukuzawa. And an English translation of his autobiography happened to be available in main stacks of the University of Tokyo library.
Fukuzawa was born into a low-ranking samurai family in Osaka in 1835. He is often described as a Japanese Benjamin Franklin. But with his knack for popping up at moments of great historical importance he also slightly resembles a Japanese Forrest Gump. When Japan opens its ports to American and European ships, he’s there. When Japan makes its first diplomatic missions abroad, he’s there. And when you dive into the history of Japan’s modern institutions—the police force, the universities, the banking system, the press—Fuzukawa is there as well.
He is most famous for translating, distilling, and disseminating Western knowledge in multiple fields through books such as An Encouragement of Learning and An Outline of a Theory of Civilization. But it is his autobiography, published just two years before his death in 1901, that offers the most comprehensive record of his life and thought.
We are lucky to have the book at all. As one of Fukuzawa’s students says in the preface, for years he rebuffed requests to set down his life story in writing. But when a visiting foreign dignitary began asking him some questions about his early childhood and education, Fukuzawa summoned a stenographer to record his answers. The book we have is an edited transcript of that impromptu oral history. And—as I found to my great surprise—it’s absolutely hilarious.
Abominable Numbers
Fukuzawa’s father is a frustrated scholar who wants nothing more than to study his Chinese classics in peace. However, due to his position as treasurer for the lord of Nankatsu, he must spend his days negotiating loans on his superior’s behalf.
Hoping to give his children a proper Confucian education, he sends Fukuzawa’s older siblings to calligraphy classes, only to be shocked to discover that they are also being taught math: “It is abominable,” he recalls his father saying, “that innocent children should be taught to use numbers—the instrument of merchants. There is no telling what the teacher may do next.”
When his father dies, the family moves to the small village of Nankatsu, where Fukuzawa proceeds to spend his childhood… not doing much of anything. He says he didn’t go to school because “there was nobody to force me to do so.” So instead he spends his time learning how to mend sandals and engaging in casual acts of blasphemy.
One day he inadvertently steps on a paper charm. After being upbraided by his brother for this breach of propriety, he decides to test the powers of these sacred charms by stealing one and deliberately trampling on it. When “heavenly vengeance” fails to manifest, he decides to up his impiety game by dropping the same charm in the stinky outhouse. When nothing happens again, he concludes that all religion is superstitious nonsense. He proceeds to replace the sacred stones in the local shrines with stones that he picks up along the side of the road. A little later, watching his neighbors make rice wine offerings to the shrines during a holy festival, he scoffs to himself: “There they are—worshipping my stones, the fools!”
From an early age he bristles at the hierarchical structure of Edo-period Japan. One objection is that feudalism forces people like his father into roles they have no interest in or aptitude for. But he also rails against the innumerable regulations, which make people behave in ridiculous ways. For example, there is a law banning samurai from attending theatrical performances (it was considered vulgar entertainment). To circumvent this ban, he says, “[m]any of the less scrupulous samurai would go to the plays with their faces wrapped in towels.” But these incognito samurai were not about to pay for their tickets like commoners, so instead they would break through the bamboo fence surrounding the theater. If the management of the establishment objected, the offending samurai would simply “utter a menacing roar and go striding on to take the best seats.”
Mostly, Fukuzawa resented the deferential attitude he had to adopt when interacting with higher-ranking samurai, especially if they were stupid. To be fair, he also expresses disdain for the sycophantic tones that peasants, artisans, and merchants were trained to assume when addressing samurai like him.
He decides to leave Nankatsu as soon as he can, in the hopes that the social atmosphere elsewhere might prove less stifling. But first he must finally attend to his education.
By the age of “fourteen or fifteen,” he says, “many of the boys of my age were studying… and I became ashamed of myself.” He finally begins going to school, which, in his case, involves reading aloud passages from Confucius and other Chinese sages in the morning and then debating the meaning of those same passages in the afternoons. Despite his late start, he learns Chinese, and proves himself a quick study. After a few years he graduates to the position of “zenza, or sub-master, in Chinese classics.”
Climbing by One’s Brush
When Fukuzawa was born, Japan was ruled by the Tokugawa shogunate—a hereditary military dictatorship founded in 1603. Under the rule of the shoguns, Japan enjoyed a remarkable two and a half centuries of peace. This was accomplished through a combination of techniques, including a policy of isolationism, the codification of a social hierarchy that granted privileges to the samurai warrior class (particularly those samurai whose ancestors had been allies of the first Tokugawa shogun), and the embrace of a Confucian ideology of duty and subservience.
Fukuzawa says that the arrival of Commodore Perry’s ships in 1853 and 1854 “made its impression on every remote town in Japan.” The resulting treaty, the Convention of Kanagawa, opened select Japanese ports to American ships. Harmless as such a treaty may sound, the Japanese had just watched Britain attack the Qing dynasty over domestic trade policy. Japan seemed destined to endure a similar loss of sovereignty now that the Americans had gotten a foot in the door.
Also worth remembering is the fact that the shogun’s formal title was sei’i-tai shogun, roughly “the general in charge of defeating the barbarians.” Given this was precisely what the shogun had failed to do in this instance, dissent was bound to grow.
Indeed, the failure of the shogun to expel the barbarians cast suspicion on every pillar of the Tokugawa regime. Far from protecting Japan, many perceived Japan’s isolationism as contributing to its technological stagnation. Moreover, the contradictions between Confucian teachings, which advocated meritocracy, and the reality of Tokugawa society, in which rank was determined by birth, threatened the intellectual rationale underpinning feudal society. This was particularly true among the samurai, whose relative status was largely determined by the side for which their distant ancestors had fought at the Battle of Sekigahara over 250 years earlier.
Finally, those who were dissatisfied with the status quo were quick to point out that the shogun nominally ruled at the pleasure of the emperor (who lived a cloistered life in Kyoto under the shogunate’s watchful eye). This imperial imprimatur had previously cemented the shogun’s legitimacy. But it suddenly seemed like a massive vulnerability. If the emperor had authorized the shogunate, the thinking went, he could also dissolve it.
These political matters seem to have hardly entered into the consciousness of the young Fukuzawa except for the fact that the intensified interest in Western learning represented a ticket out of Nankatsu.
For over two centuries, the sole point of contact between Japan and Europe had been an artificial island in Nagasaki called Dejima. The Dutch had occupied the island since 1641, exercising a carefully monitored monopoly in trade. As a result, the few Western books that entered Japan were generally written in Dutch. Any Japanese person who wanted to learn Western science therefore needed to gain fluency in that language (which, given the limited opportunities for interaction between the two groups, was not so easy).
Soon after Perry’s arrival, Fukuzawa’s older brother tells him that Japan needs more people to study Western science. He asks Fukuzawa: “Are you willing to learn the Dutch language?”
It is worth noting at this point that not everyone in Japan was thrilled at the prospect of studying Dutch.
Some of these objections were aesthetic in nature. One Japanese scholar complained that Dutch letters were simply too ugly to communicate civilized ideas. Whereas Chinese characters were “balanced and well-proportioned” like “beautiful women” and “deftly constructed” like “golden palaces and jade pagodas,” the letters of the Latin alphabet were “confused and irregular,” resembling nothing so much as “dried bones” and the “slime lines left by snails.”
Popular verse conveyed a similar message. “When the samisen string snaps,” one Japanese poet exclaimed, “it looks like a Dutch letter.”
Whether or not the scholars and poets had a point, such sentiments were also indicative of what the kids today would call “massive cope.” After the arrival of Perry’s ships, notions of Japanese supremacy had collided headlong with an unforgiving reality wherein Japan was at the mercy of powerful and predatory Western nations.
Of these consequential political developments, the young Fukuzawa seems to have been mostly unaware. Remembering this time near the end of his life, he says, “I would have been glad to study a foreign language or the military art or anything else if it only gave me the chance to go away.”
Undoubtedly, part of the attraction of such a course of action lay in the fact that the classroom formed a rare place in Japanese society where a parallel hierarchy based on competence could emerge. Despite never evincing a concern with acquiring a better social position, Fukuzawa could not have been totally ignorant of the fact that scholarship represented one of the few opportunities for upward social mobility in the shogunate—a phenomenon captured by the delightful phrase “climbing by one’s brush.” Schoolrooms were a rare place where he could leave his social betters in his dust; and by becoming a noted scholar he could force his superiors to acknowledge his abilities.
A Two-Sworded Man
After setting his mind to learning Dutch, Fukuzawa accompanies his brother on a business trip to Nagasaki.
Things begin smoothly enough. Soon after his arrival, he manages to get a position as an “eating guest” in the house of an expert on Dutch artillery. The son of his lord’s chancellor is also studying Dutch in Nagasaki and helps show him the ropes. But within a few months, Fukuzawa has become an indispensable assistant to his host. He earns his keep making handwritten copies of Dutch books and translating diagrams for operating field cannons.
Fukuzawa’s swift progress upsets the chancellor’s son, his social superior. In a fit of jealousy, the chancellor’s son asks his father to order Fukuzawa home.
Because defying such an order by staying in Nagasaki would be unthinkable, Fukuzawa decides to defy the order by leaving for Osaka instead. He fakes a letter of introduction for himself which earns him a stay in some hotels. By sailboat and by foot he gradually makes his way to his family’s storage office in Osaka where his brother has assumed their father’s role as treasurer.
In Osaka he resumes his studies of Dutch at a local academy. But before too much time has passed, Fukuzawa’s brother dies. Fukuzawa returns to Nankatsu to observe the mandatory fifty days of mourning. But upon his arrival, he finds that his relatives have decided on his behalf that he will assume his brother’s position—a role filled with obligations and responsibilities that would tie him down for life.
In order to return to his studies, Fukuzawa must now navigate a minefield of formal and informal rules. On the informal side, he must manage his family, who are all furious that he is even considering abandoning his post. He gets approval from his mother to return to Osaka, which overrides the objections of his other disgruntled relatives. But there is also the matter of attaining official sanction from his lord. Due to his new status as a household head, he must get a permit to travel “abroad” (in this case, to another city).
He writes a petition asking for permission to go study Dutch. The lord’s secretary reviews the petition and tells Fukuzawa flatly that it “will not be accepted.” The reasoning is simple: “in this clan,” says the secretary, “there has not been any precedent of a samurai leaving his duty for the purpose of studying Dutch culture.” But the solution is simple: Fukuzawa is to lie and say he is going to study artillery instead, because someone else has done that before. When Fukuzawa objects to such underhanded tactics, the secretary responds with a statement that is very culturally revealing: “It does not matter whether your statement is true to fact or not so long as it follows precedent.”
After rewriting his petition in the recommended fashion, Fukuzawa gets his permit and sets off again for Osaka. At this point the reader is treated to a detailed description of Japanese student life in the late 1850s.
There are sophomore hijinks, many of them involving alcohol (plus ça change): “I was pretty well behaved in most respects,” he says, “but in drink I was a boy without conscience.” At one point he decides to quit drinking. To ease his cravings, he takes up smoking instead. But after less than a month he relents (“my old love of wine—it would not be forgotten”) and finds himself a “‘two-sworded’ man”: a drinker and a smoker.
In summer, the students walk around drunk and naked (to the horror of the maids); in winter they leave their undergarments outside in the freezing cold to kill the hordes of lice that infest them. They threaten gatekeepers and rampage through the city’s dark streets and steal cups and trays from their favorite restaurants.
Nevertheless, Fukuzawa is keen to impress upon his readers that a lot of studying happened as well. There were sleepless nights spent practicing for the reading competitions that would determine their rank in the academy. As they copied out passages from chemistry textbooks and metallurgical texts they also engaged in haphazard experiments, occasionally producing sickening gases and noxious fumes. At one point, though, Fukuzawa and a group of friends bask in the triumph of having plated iron with tin using zinc chloride—“a feat beyond the practice of any tin craftsman in the land.”
Due to the fortuitous arrival of a new Dutch science book at the school’s library, Fukuzawa and his fellow students also become the country’s leading experts in electricity. Such were the times: because of their uncommon linguistic skills, their knowledge of the world outstripped that of any “prince or nobleman.” He says: “we students were conscious of the fact that we were the sole possessors of the key to knowledge of the great European civilization.”
To Edo and Beyond
Having become one of the best students in Osaka, Fukuzawa is invited by a leading advocate of Dutch culture to open a school in Edo. His timing is very good. Soon after his arrival the Ansei Treaties are signed, which open up more of Japan’s ports to foreign ships. Excited to communicate with real foreigners, he goes to Yokohama and begins speaking to some of the merchants in residence there. Only he is saddened to realize that communication is impossible. Nobody speaks Dutch.
Eventually he learns that the Dutch have ceased to be a naval superpower and that their language is not very widely spoken at all. “I had been striving with all my powers for many years to learn the Dutch language,” he says, “[a]nd now when I had reason to believe myself one of the best interpreters in the country, I found that I could not even read the signs of merchants who had come to trade with us from foreign lands.”
Rather than Dutch, he learns that English is now dominant. He realizes “that a man would have to be able to read and converse in English to be recognized as a scholar in foreign subjects.” There’s one big problem with this: nobody in Japan knows English.
He manages to find a Dutch-English dictionary and begins the difficult business of learning the new words. At first, he is fearful that English will prove to be as different from Dutch as Dutch is from Japanese. Happily, this turns out not to be the case. “In truth,” he says, “Dutch and English were both ‘strange languages written sideways’ of the same origin. Our knowledge of Dutch could be applied directly to English.”
While Fukuzawa is in Edo, the shogunate decides to send a diplomatic mission to the United States. It will be the first Japanese ship ever to cross the Pacific Ocean. Fukuzawa desperately wants to go, so he approaches the captain with a letter of introduction (a real one this time) and is accepted to become part of the crew.
What follows is an exquisite outsider’s view of nineteenth-century Californian society. Upon their arrival in San Francisco, the Japanese are shocked by the sight of horse-drawn carriages, wall-to-wall carpeting, and ice-filled champagne glasses. Fukuzawa is also amazed by the prices of groceries in California (plus ça change) and is even more astounded when a gentleman he meets says he does not know where George Washington’s descendants live (“I could not help feeling that the family of Washington should be regarded as apart from all other families”).
But Fukuzawa’s greatest joy comes from having his photograph taken. At the studio, he invites the photographer’s daughter to pose next to him, to which she readily agrees. After leaving San Francisco harbor, Fukuzawa shows his prize to his fellow crew members: “You all talk a lot about your affairs,” he jokes, “but how many of you have brought back a picture of yourselves with a young lady as a souvenir of San Francisco?” Fukuzawa basks in the crew’s “extreme envy of [his] relic.”
At one point, he reflects on the significance of this voyage, and the reader cannot help but agree with the general sentiment: “It was not until the sixth year of Kaei (1853) that a steamship was seen for the first time; it was only in the second year of Ansei (1855) that we began to study navigation from the Dutch in Nagasaki; by 1860, the science was sufficiently understood to enable us to sail a ship across the Pacific. This means that about seven years after the first sight of a steamship, after only about five years of practice, the Japanese people made a trans-Pacific crossing without help from foreign experts. I think we can without undue pride boast before the world of this courage and skill.”
Once back in Japan, Fukuzawa publishes his first book: a Japanese-English dictionary. Two years later, he is invited to join Japan’s first embassy to Europe as an interpreter. He purchases stacks of books in London, marvels at the size of the Hotel du Louvre (“the large party of our Japanese envoys was lost in it”), and faints while watching surgery performed in a St. Petersburg hospital.
Race-Fight
When Fukuzawa began studying Dutch, he says people often thought of it as an eccentric habit. They were more incredulous than anything that someone would choose to spend their time doing such a thing. But upon his return from Europe, he says the mood changed considerably. “All Japan was now hopelessly swept by the anti-Western feeling, and nothing could stop its force from rushing to the ultimate consequence.”
Of course, there had been precedents for such outbreaks of anti-foreign sentiment. In 1839, before Perry’s arrival, a group of scholars founded the “Barbarian Studies Group” to advocate for the study of Western culture. But when they criticized the shogunate’s aggressive attitude towards foreigners, they were charged with “planning to leave Japan”—a crime punishable by death. This event, known as the “Purge of the Barbarian Scholars” resulted in the three men committing suicide.
During the subsequent period, in a grim foreshadowing of the twentieth century, many politicians publicly embraced hostile rhetoric (the phrase “expel the barbarians” was popular) while acknowledging privately that such a course was untenable. Various radical groups, lacking the same discernment, embarked on a campaign of assassination against anyone perceived as pro-Western.
Fear was palpable. Fukuzawa says that “even some of the merchants engaged in foreign trade suddenly closed up their shops for fear of these lawless warriors.” One of his friends narrowly escapes assassination by jumping into a castle moat. Another manages to escape through the back door of his house when it is broken into. For all this, Fukuzawa says that he “could not think of giving up [his] major interest nor [his] chosen studies.” Nevertheless, for a period of about “thirteen or fourteen years,” he does “not once venture out of doors at night.” He becomes, by his own admission, a “recluse.”
As much as his social life may have suffered as a result of this isolation, he makes great progress on a number of translations. Among them is the first Western economics book translated into Japanese. In the course of this work, he encounters difficulties with the concept of “competition.” He decides to coin a new Japanese word, kyoso, derived from the words for “race and fight.” His patron, a Confucian, is unimpressed with this translation. He suggests other renderings. Why not “love of the nation shown in connection with trade”? Or “open generosity from a merchant in times of national stress”? But Fukuzawa insists on kyoso, and now the word is the first result on Google Translate.
Against this backdrop, the shogunate and supporters of the imperial house begin waging a civil war. Fukuzawa does not take sides. “After all, both parties seemed to be alike in their anti-foreign prejudice.” On the one hand, the end of the feudal society that Fukuzawa disliked so intensely was in sight. On the other hand, the opposing side had a habit of murdering people with his chosen profession. He does his best to stay out of it, and as war comes to the streets of Edo, he begins building a new school just as everyone else evacuates the city. So much the better, he says, for “all the carpenters and masons were delighted to get work then.” The school would form the basis of the institution that would eventually be named Keio University.
He goes on to found a newspaper and write many more books that are “accepted eagerly by the public.” Most writers of the time, he says, composed works that they hoped would earn them government posts (the nineteenth-century equivalent of publishing for tenure), and as a result, Fukuzawa “seemed to be alone in writing for popular causes.” His success leads people to assume that he must covet a post in the new imperial government anyway, and he delights in foiling these expectations.
Fukuzawa Sensei’s Guide to Life
The autobiography concludes with some remarks on his “household economy” and private life. Despite his drinking habit, he is happy to say that he has never acquired debts or lived beyond his means. The future success or failure of his school does not seem to bother him. If he could not afford to keep his teachers, he would simply “teach by [himself] as many students as [he] could handle alone.”
He explains his philosophy of childrearing in some depth, which entails encouraging “gentleness of mind and liveliness of body.” That seems to mean no physical punishment and taking the occasional piece of broken furniture or torn sliding door in stride. His unorthodox thoughts on educating children also deserve mention: “I do not show them a single letter of the alphabet until after they are four or five years old. At seven or eight, I sometimes give them calligraphy lessons.” Fukuzawa stresses that his “chief care is always for their physical health.” While “many parents are liable to be overanxious about their children’s studies,” he says, “in my house no child is praised for reading a book.” Instead, he rewards them “when they take an unusually long walk, or if they show an improvement in jujitsu or gymnastics.”
When his grown sons leave to study in America, he writes them every week—for six years. Before they go, he tells them: “I don’t want you to come back great scholars, pale and sickly. I would much rather have you come back ignorant but healthy.”
In his old age, he begins to wean himself off alcohol. “First I gave up my morning wine, then my noon wine.” In these times his “mouth and mind were always at war.” But he manages. He pounds rice and chops wood for exercise, walks four miles every day before breakfast, and dresses himself in simple cotton shirts. When the mood strikes, he composes poems about autumn dawns and temple bells.
But perhaps his greatest piece of advice is this one: “I never forget that all my personal worries and immediate concerns are but a part of the ‘comedy’ of this ‘floating world,’” and “our entire lives but an aspect of some higher consciousness.”
What Would Fukuzawa Do?
As I write this, the American president has accused the Japanese of xenophobia. As Fukuzawa’s story demonstrates, such sentiments have played a major role in Japanese history. Though I must say, having lived for nearly two years in Japan, I have never been treated poorly. On the contrary, I struggle to name another place in the world where people might have been so patient with a foreigner who can hardly speak the language and who understands so little of the local customs.
But Japan does have some problems.
The litany is familiar: a shrinking and aging population, low growth, falling productivity, a depreciating currency, static wages. Proposed measures to address these challenges (Abenomics, childcare allowances, etc) have had limited success. After reading his autobiography, I have to wonder: “What would Fukuzawa do?”
A man who dedicated himself to teaching people English may balk at the state of English language education in Japan, where only around 5% of the population are fluent. This arguably has some benefits, insofar as it insulates Japan from some of the silly ideas currently infesting the Anglosphere (though QAnon still seems to have made it through). But the link between English language fluency and global economic competitiveness seems pretty well established.
If I could summarize Fukuzawa’s primary skill in one clunky phrase, it would be “cultural arbitrage.” As a teenager he seemed to realize the vast world of information hidden in foreign languages. And with only a cursory grasp of global geopolitics, he saw that knowledge of English would be key to future success on the international stage. Becoming one of the first Japanese people fluent in English made him the gateway through which torrents of knowledge in every field entered Japanese society.
So what opportunities for cultural arbitrage exist today? How can Japan put Fukuzawa’s skillset to work?
One capacity that Japan enjoys that seems beyond the reach of their American counterparts is the operation of clean, safe, and dynamic cities. Some are so distraught by the state of American urban life that they are trying to build new countries in the cloud or secede from the U.S. Given the massive spike in urban crime after the pandemic, such ideas are understandable.
Japanese policymakers should look at this situation with Fukuzawa’s eyes. What would he see? I venture he might notice two things: 1) a country with a shrinking population but an unmatched capacity to build, and 2) a large group of wealthy and competent people desperately seeking a functional urban space to live and work.
Bring these things together, and you get Dejima 2.0: a new Japanese city for skilled foreigners fleeing urban dysfunction. Dejima 2.0, much like the first Dejima during the shogunate, would serve as an interface between Japan and the outside world, facilitating trade and offering a test bed for new technologies.
Imagine it: a new Hong Kong without the authoritarianism, a Próspera with better sushi. Many islands in Japan are now populated by more cats than people. There’s not a shortage of promising sites.
But the best thing of all, which I think should make it palatable to even the most conservative Japanese official: it follows precedent.
Outstanding! No idea if I'll read any others, but hopefully I'll remember this one when it's time to vote.
Very well written. Concise but full of good info. My only critique is that it could use an epilogue. I found myself wanting to know more about Fukuzawa's legacy. Did he remain a popular figure throughout the Meiji period or was he rehabilitated, so to speak, after the war? Does he have any lasting influence besides adorning the 10,000 yen note?
I wish the review said something about the Meiji period. I heard it mention a struggle between the shogun and emperor, and I think the Meiji period somehow came out of this, but I would have like to hear that, and how Fukuzawa fit into that. Also, it never came back to say anything about when he got into bacteriology!
The bacteriologist was a different guy, on the 1000 yen note, not the 10,000.
This link might be a good place to start:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boshin_War
Excellent review about a unique place and time that's rarely described in the West, but something else will truly stick with me: the absurd and hilarious reach to bring up charter cities at the end. Whoever wrote this knows his audience well. I'll have to remember to include a reference to prediction markets in my review submission next year.
I mean, seriously... There's already complaints of "overtourism" by the Japanese, with legions of unruly tourists making things difficult for the locals. A foreign charter city under these circumstances would be utterly unpalatable.
A new city specifically built for Western visitors I don't think would receive the same sort of complaints
And those people wouldn't stay there, would they? Giving a bunch of foreigners who refuse to integrate with society permanent residence, who will constantly visit Japan proper and make the tourism situation even worse... It's never going to happen.
Japan's probably got to suck it up and deal with some mildly annoying foreigners at some point if they want to keep their economy going
Alternatively, they'll ride the population curve down comfortably, getting per-capita richer as they go, and prove that the rest of us have ruined our societies for nothing.
Japan is about 30% larger than New Zealand, it would probably be a pretty nice place with six or seven million people. And if those six or seven million people continue to own Toyota, Sony, Mitsubishi etc (all happily producing goods from their foregin-located factories) then those seven million people will be rich as fuck.
"Japan is about 30% larger than New Zealand, it would probably be a pretty nice place with six or seven million people."
It's notable that far more people visit Japan than New Zealand. The people ARE an attraction, directly or indirectly.
"And if those six or seven million people continue to own Toyota, Sony, Mitsubishi etc (all happily producing goods from their foregin-located factories)"
The foreign-owned factories are in countries that are also going to experience population decline. (Though realistically, AGI will make all this irrelevant.)
Ruined societies?
Care to explain what you mean by that?
My first thought is that you've got some wild ideas about the effects of immigration, but I don't want to jump to conclusions.
Im pretty sure that’s what he means.
"Wild" isn't an honest qualifier here unless you know which immigrants he means; rushing straight to it (as if it's a preposterous notion, a priori, to doubt Magic Dirt Theory: no immigrant groups ever have or could be disproportionately criminal by the very fact of their vibrant diversity! or something) makes me feel like your take is going to be extremely predictable and impervious to change...
...but maybe I'm wrong! I won't find out, though, most likely — I'm trying not to spend hours arguing online anymore... it's a disease 😢
Their claim was "ruined our societies".
Not "disproportionate criminality", not "excessive demand-side pressure on the housing market", not "costs that overall outweigh the benefits".
You can make a case for lower immigration. I'll listen even if I disagree. But if you start claiming that our society has been "ruined" by immigration, I'm not going to take you seriously.
Anyway, it's entirely possible that Melvin was talking about something more reasonable. As I said, I don't want to jump to conclusions.
Okay, fair enough, perhaps 𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 is a somewhat wild word to use.
--------------------------
[NOTE: wrote way too much; I'm trying to stop doing that, lol. I hold no grudges if you decide not to read it; I'll read whatever you say in response, but may not reply further if I fear the Daemon Logorrhea takin' hold again—]
-------------------------
...but I dunno, man, at the same time, you know what he 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴. Like, "costs that outweigh the benefits" is ultimately what "ruined" means, in practice, I might argue — especially with visceral costs and diffuse benefits, which is what makes it difficult to support large-scale immigration even in cases wherein I DO¹ support it².
I.e., it could end up sorta close to "ruined", even if not quite there — just with maybe a dash of rhetorical hyperbole...?
Consider, too, that with all the discussion and hypotheticals and examples and so forth we might throw around, such as those below, there's still another element to consider; one that might not be worth debating without a lot of time and will, but which I think most folks understand a bit deep down, if honest...
...which is to say: crime numbers and cost-of-living and housing and w/e aren't the full story: even if all was well by the numbers, there is also a cost to being forced to say — when looking around the city or nation one grew up in — "I don't recognize the place any more. The culture and people I loved have been irrevocably changed."
Sure, some change is inevitable, and it's not like "oh life is not worth living any more" or anything; but... either one of the above — the more nebulous latter factor, or the more concrete former set — could, it seems to me, be aaaalmost characterized as "ruination", with (as said) only a little bit of hyperbole.
-------------------------------
Or a lot. Suppose it depends, as said earlier...
Well, imagine the actual experience of living in a city that has had very high and rapid third-world immigration from (say) Somalia & co.—
—wherein the numbers are NOT good AND you have a very alien culture imported (so neither like me and the Mexicans—see: footnotes—wherein perhaps crime rate is up but the culture is not alien at all; nor like... I dunno, a hypothetical Texas that's overrun by Japanese, wherein they are very different, BUT might be a net + if assessed purely by economic indicators and so on; but the worst of BOTH worlds)—:
• "guess what! YOU'RE poorer, there's more crime, you can't afford a house (though your father before you did; what kinda man are you anyway), it's crowded, you can't understand many of the people around you and their foreign yelling and musics are keeping your wife up at night but when your buddy's friend tried to say something in a similar situation he was beat to death in front of his new bride, and best of all they're from a low-trust society wherein taking care of public goods is not a thing!*"
(* "—so even 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘴 & 𝘨𝘰𝘷'𝘵 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘴 & 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘴 & 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴 etc. are now trashed-out, and 𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦!")
...well, it's easy to see how one might decide that's "ruined", though it is neither universal to the host society (there must be better cities, right) nor to the immigrants' (probably some confounders in this picture of them), and it is not LITERALLY unliveable.
and! before you say "well obv that's super exaggerated": not so! and I can prove it, 'cause I have personally been to such places in w. Europe (and the "beat in front of bride" thing is a real event, though I can't remember what started the altercation between neighbors; can find it again if significant, np).
not that I was ever a native, of course — but when the natives told me that it did not used to be such a hellhole, well... I believe 'em.
I think it's very obvious that — though these cases are on one side of the scale and hence perhaps not representative — the immigrants have failed to confirm the Magic Dirt hypothesis, here; and, hence, that they seem to have brought many of their issues with them — issues that, let us not forget, are the same reason many seek desperately to escape their own homeland (seems like THEY might call it "ruined", even!—).
(but without those who knew how to handle the issues; instead, a weak and permissive European government hopped up on ideology tried to do the ol' "what if the real $$ was respect and tolerance all along?" thing, and rightfully got "hahaha shut up now I SAID gimme your wallet" back instead.
(...so to speak. I'm quite tired and I am no longer 100% I'm not actually just dreaming I'm typing this.)
----------------------------------
...anyway. I spent too long thinking about this and kept getting interrupted, so please excuse me if there are typos and/or I have become wildly sidetracked. . . heh. . . heh..
why do I mention that last bit, you ask? oh... no reason... [cough] oh look some footnotes—
.
.
.
.
----------------------------------
~ 𝘒𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘨𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘮 𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯 & 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘺 ~
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
¹: (most stereotypes are true, you know... but "Mexicans are lazy" is the only one I can think of that is actually the inverse of true, heh.)
----------------------------------
²: (e.g.: okay, I know I betray my "side" here, but—I'm fine with Mexicans coming to the U.S.A. 🤷♂️
but for this, as said, I often find it hard to make a case, because people can SEE the immigrants taking jobs for 2/3 what they would and living stacked 5 deep to a single-wide, and they SEE the news with all the new shootings and giant drug busts etc.; but it is harder to show them nebulous economic effects, say, or to try to point to stuff like cuisine when we're not lacking for Tex-Mex nor Mexican restaurants...
although I'm personally fine with the drugs, and mostly they just tend to shoot others involved in the trade.
...well, what can I say! I love Texas not least BECAUSE of the Hispanic population — these are the people I grew up around! the buddies who taught me to bust ass at work when I first entered the oilfield [see: ¹]!
these are the girls I ended up having a 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 for — oh, God, a slim Latina girl with that long midnight waterfall of hair pooling for an instant upon narrow shoulders before f–
...ahem.
—the people responsible for the food I grew up eating (and still love best)!
but most of all: I just like 'em, and their version of Texas/America/life. 🤷♂️ ofc not everyone is the same — but y'all know what I mean, how you start recognizing some certain "types"? yeah, I started finding some common elements every time I joined a new Hispanic work crew; and I grew to love it.
really, I like the Hispanic vision of America/life moreso than I do that of my own people, in fact, any more. my buddies and I often joke: "see, this is why we need more of y'all, Ezekiel, call up your cousins in Guanajuato...!" every time we see some contrasting set of events such as:–
"white woman hysterically demanding witch hunts because of Hugh Mungus"
[or]
"HR writing one of our guys up for smoking in garage and drinking the terrifying banned energy drink, Red Bull"
{ <-----> }
"Mexican lead tech shouting obscenities at his girlfriend then hanging up with a sheepish grin and 'women, eh, hermanos?! ayyyy, qué bruja... pinche mujeres... [muttering]'"
[or]
"mechanic pinning up his new nudie calendar from Sonora as he invites us to BBQ, tequila, and UFC later on—promising that this time he isn't going to let his narcomigo come over and tempt us with cheap, barely-stepped-upon coke"...
...you know what I mean?
yeah yeah YEAH, I KNOW; it's better in a lot of ways to get rid of that "macho" stuff, in the workplace especially; the behaviors described weren't good for us, sure...
[& probably wouldn't have been good for any hypothetical female co-worker—not that there was any danger of any applying, mind you; none even stuck around to meet us after hearing the hours and the work, lol.]
so — I know there are reasons that pearls are clutched over vulgarities, and tobacco, and appreciating nice caderas out loud, and getting drunk while watching dudes punch each other in the face before deciding "ah fukkit dude eyyy rack me up a line aight cabrón"; but...
...damned if it wasn't just like—
—FINALLY getting a big deep fresh breath of air again, every time I'd travel somewhere really white and Left-y & then come back to our good ol' Tejano/Mexamerican boys in TX. 🥲
from stiff disapproval and passive-aggressive suggestions about making sure not to offend anyone—God forbid—because, when first promoted, I still tended to wear my steeltoes & a T-shirt, and cursed like breathing, and often offered to pick everyone up a burrito at lunch...
[— an offer viewed with suspicion; I think half because they weren't sure a white fella was allowed to say that word without Appropriating something, and half because it turns out that in the NE—at least, as I experienced it—you just don't tend to do nice stuff for strangers / new acquaintances.]
[related: I could not believe it when an ambulance came blaring up the street and people DIDN'T EVEN PULL OVER TO GET OUTTA THE WAY. maybe that's a Texan/Hispanic thing too, hell, for all I know.
[Jesus, I hated having to fly up there.]
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
...anyway. I got super sidetracked. If I had some sort of point, well, uh... let that be a lesson to you, I guess. 👌 or, possibly: thanks for agreeing with me on whatever it was we were talking about, broseph. 👊)
----------------------------------
P.S. I'm pretty sure my initial objection was mostly just because of the direction in which my bias lies, heh — I can feel myself getting hot at the mere idea of someone using "ruined our societ[y]" to refer to something III am in favor of...
...so despite my half-hearted and rambling attempt to defend it, yeah, I'd probably object just as you have.
You do wonder if they've just decided "you know, we're kind of too crowded on this tiny little island, let's thin things out a little so we can have more space".
If they were worried about crowding they wouldn't keep moving from depopulated rural areas to Tokyo.
Probably where the jobs are.
But we do see birth rates fall in cities and the like. After a certain level of compression people refuse to breed.
Most animals do; why would we be any different?
It's not really a "tiny little island." it's roughly the same size as the entire US east coast (combining all 4 main islands together). And it's not that crowded overall- it's roughly the same overall density as the UK, with tons of small villages dying out for lack of people.
It's really just Tokyo that's too crowded. And really, even there, the quality of life is surprisingly good. The review kinda touched on this at the end- Japanese cities are really incredible. It doesn't "feel" overcrowded like you'd expect just looking at the numbers (with a few obvious exceptions like main subway stations during rush hour).
Japan's per-capita GDP is lower now than it was in 1993:
https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/JPN/japan/gdp-per-capita
Your assumption that they would get richer as their population shrank has not been borne out. Rather, per-capita GDP was growing more back when the population was.
Their GDP per capita has been stagnant after converting to US dollars by market exchange rates and adjusting for US inflation.
However, if you use PPP GDP per capita (adjust for Japanese inflation and convert to dollars according to relative domestic prices), their GDP per capita has more than doubled in the same time period.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?locations=JP&most_recent_value_desc=true&start=1993
I suspect the enormous gap between the two metrics is driven by change in trade policy. For a long time, Japan had extensive policies of tariffs, subsidies, etc designed to promote exports and limit imports, and consequently had an enormous trade surplus. They've softened these policies in recent decades and have had a trade deficit most years since 2011. An artificial trade surplus strengthens your currency on the international market, but it tends to raise domestic cost of living by limiting imports and selling domestic goods overseas instead of back home.
Only by nominal GDP. Not by PPP:
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?locations=JP
Do you think they seem very happy right now? Lol.
Inbound tourism - even at the current record levels - contributes less than 1% of Japan’s GDP. Aggregate domestic consumption as reported in the national accounts has gone backwards as tourism has exploded. The annoying foreigners just don’t move the economic needle.
It's not easy to build a city from scratch because of all the chicken-and-egg problems involved. Cities experience strong network effects, and there's also the problem that all the best geographical spots were taken long ago.
A charter city would presumably have a filter on who's allowed to come in. The very best engineers of the West are by far the very, very best immigrants you could possibly want in your country.
From what I understand they are way too parochial to capitalize on their enormous competitive advantage in attracting Western engineers. Lots of skinny Asian ladies, at least some of whom are probably familiar with anime? Then again feminists would probably knock it down.
How politically influential is feminism in Japan?
No, feminism here. They'd pressure the Japanese to quit.
How are feminists here going to pressure the Japanese against a charter city?
It was partially a joke, though I imagine they'd probably raise complains in the American media and Japan would eventually comply because, well, it's us or China.
Doesn't Japan still engage in whaling even though the west wants them to stop?
They no longer whale south of the equator, which was the biggest issue.
Japan is a lot less conservative than often portrayed. Imagine how much more conservative you would think the UK is if the left was permanently disorganised allowing the Tories to win every single election for generations on end. Because that is basically the situation in Japan.
It seems like there are complaints about tourism in every tourism-heavy economy.* Usually the politicians are smart enough to realize the dire consequences of driving them away, so it remains mostly talk. It's kinda funny how many of the same people who dismiss complaints about immigrants as irrational xenophobia will make similar-sounding complaints about foreign tourists.
*Come to think of it, I haven't heard much about anti-tourist sentiment in Israel.
When I visited Hawaii, the contrast was obvious. There was an official line about "aloha culture", and a lot of effort spent in buttering up people coming to the islands and staying within the main tourist areas. But off those areas, there were indiciations that the locals had much more mixed feelings, including the resentment that comes from dependence. It felt kind of like... cultural prostitution, if that makes any sense?
Amen! I found the whole thing informative and enjoyable, and then I got to the "application to today" and thought "oh dear..."
Same. I think the review would have been a lot better without the ill-conceived political advocacy at the end.
+1
I just learned that this is the Japanese character in The Difference Engine. (The name was mentioned of course, but I had no context for knowing who it was.)
It seems like the suggestion at the end of the review could have been fleshed out better.
> Given the massive spike in urban crime after the pandemic...a large group of wealthy and competent people desperately seeking a functional urban space to live and work. Bring these things together, and you get ... a new Japanese city for skilled foreigners fleeing urban dysfunction.
If pandemics cause urban crime, how can we be sure that some future pandemic won't cause the same problem in the new city, or that COVID's effects on crime in Japan aren't simply lagging?
If something else causes urban crime, like demographics, then how can we be sure that those problems would be absent in the new city? Would the immigration be skill-based, thus filtering out problem elements?
Is the proposal, then, just skill based immigration to Japan? If so, why designate them a special city, at all? Did anyone benefit from the Dutch and later Europeans being consigned to Dejima? The review makes it sound like everyone lost out. The Japanese lost out by having their access to valuable European resources (including knowledge) stymied. And since trade is mutually beneficial, the Europeans would have lost out, as well.
Is the point, then, to maximize benefits to the extent allowed by Japanese xenophobia, which as in previous centuries would only allow foreigners to reside on one island? How would that solve the overall population decline of Japan, then?
Last, if the idea is to harness high-skilled workers who want to emigrate to better opportunities, then it seems likely that many, if not most, of such workers would reside in countries like India, rather than the US. Urban disorder is, after all, not the only factor that drives migration.
If my experience living in Korea is any guidance here, westerners aren’t going to integrate into Japanese society in large numbers anyway. Nor is that society going to receive increased immigration well. So “just letting them immigrate” does not sound like a good solution. Organizing a specific place where they can live mostly among themselves while enjoying sporadic, deliberate contact with the host culture while also staying out of sight seems much more feasible in the long run. Korea used to have (and probably still does) less restrictive immigration rules for its island, Jeju. That seemed very smart, though it mostly only attracted tourists.
What relevant experiences have you had in Korea?
I lived there for about 4 and a half years, in Seoul. I was a postdoc then, working at Yonsei University. I present as caucasian. While I felt mostly welcome and respected as a foreigner, it was pretty clear that no Korean would ever consider me one of them, no matter how much Korean language I learned (I got to ~B1 level, which is pretty high for a native speaker of Italian like me). I would always be a waikukin. Which is fine, honestly. But I don’t think the average American EFL teacher will fare much better than me. So I don’t see a point in mass immigration to Korea, and I assume Japan is the same if not harder to integrate into
Japan is significantly less culturally homogenous than Korea so I think it would go easier. Still a big difference from the West though.
It’s much bigger and historically fragmented, with places like Hokkaido and Okinawa that represent late additions to “core” Japan, but still it’s waaay more homogeneous than any new world country. Even Brazilian Japanese who come back to Japan report difficulties in reintegrating into Japanese society.
Suppose, as seems plausible, that Japanese cities function so well in large part because most of their population has been acculturated into distinctively Japanese cultural norms. Then perhaps one promising way of exporting that competence would be to:
(a) translate into English more of whatever Japanese literature exists that explicitly describes those norms and the methods of their acculturation,
(b) strive to make explicit more of whatever is implicit and not written down,
(c) open schools for foreigners who want their kids acculturated into those norms,
and so on. This is compatible with, maybe even complementary to, the building of charter cities for foreigners within Japan; but it might also be appealing to charter city types outside of Japan.
Of course, Japan's problems are also likely related to the same package of norms that produces its strengths, and disentangling good from bad would to say the least not be simple.
Relevant: https://www.richardhanania.com/i/144704779/confucius-of-the-gaps.
"Japanese cultural norms" isn't some complex, esoteric thing. It ultimately just boils down to "don't do things that inconvenience others". But apparently that's too difficult for people to understand.
Honestly, the reason that these other countries can't get these results is that they're far too tolerant. They lack the culture of fear that enshrines these values within the populace. Fear of failure, abandonment, disgrace, alienation. And the strict heirarchies that enforce this fear.
...Or maybe it's just genetic, who knows.
Bowing in 15-degree increments depending on relative social status and occasion is 'don't do things that inconvenience others'? It's a whole web of customs that evolved over thousands of years.
It's more hygienic than shaking hands. https://www.betonit.ai/p/swine_flu_and_hhtml
I agree. The wa (和) in Wagyu and washoku etc etc referring to Japan (Wagyu = 和牛 = Japanese beef; washoku = 和食 = Japanese food) means “harmony”. I often think this explains much of supposedly esoteric Japanese cultural norms. The goal is a harmonious society; people are very aware of others and do their best not to inconvenience the people around them.
I mean, yeah, but that's stacked on Confucian values and about a millennium and a half of history. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the Japanese; I for one would be hard-pressed to suggest improvements to their society from the outside. But it's not as simple as 'harmony' and 'avoid inconveniencing others'.
One obvious area for improvement is Japan's toxic work culture, which requires everyone to pointlessly stay late at the office and then go out drinking afterwards.
I agree but, you know, it's their country.
> Of course, Japan's problems are also likely related to the same package of norms that produces its strengths, and disentangling good from bad would to say the least not be simple.
My first reaction was that the cultural norm of "staying pointlessly late at the office" would probably make this offer less attractive for foreigners.
Then I remembered that Google is basically doing the same, so I am not so sure anymore. I guess the difference is that Google uses the carrot (having everything available at your workplace, so you have little reason to leave) rather than the stick (leaving your workplace at a reasonable time would bring social disapproval and that is the worst imaginable thing).
In order to enforce social norms, there must be a punishment for their breaking. So the proper explanation of Japanese culture would include the mechanisms that punish any deviation from the norms. Social pressure only goes so far, because some people don't give a fuck; what happens to them? Are all of them thrown to jail? Do people who inconvenience others during their free time somehow lose an opportunity to ever get a decent job? (This of course assumes that there is such a thing as free time, so maybe that is the answer.) On the other hand, there is also crime in Japan, there are the criminals with tattoos and somehow not all of them are in jail, so the enforcement of the norms is not perfect. So how does the mechanism that is not perfect still keep most people in a very strict line? Is it maybe because the society is clearly divided to rule-followers and rule-breakers, and if you are among the former, you need to signal it very hard all the time?
Yeah, agree with a lot of this, especially that the review probably should have fleshed the idea out; it felt like it was just tacked on for the sake of having a "point" to the review, and as is, kinda distracts from the point of the review - I suspect a disproportionate amount of the discussion is going to center on just these last few paragraphs.
Oh to live on an island full of cats
But the ending does sound like a really good idea. City-states with technocratic governance have a severe supply/demand imbalance (Look at Singapore even despite the terrible weather). We keep recommending economically struggling countries build SEZs, but maybe it makes more sense to push for them in richer countries with good technocratic governance and low fertility.
Singapore has very low fertility, as is common with cities. The solution to low fertility is not in building new cities, however much I might favor that idea for other reasons.
Singapore had high fertility when it was starting out. The solution to low fertility is to start more new stuff, not to give up on building anything new.
Not "anything new". A new suburb or exurb would also be new!
It's more about the spirit of building up new things. I importantly think a major problem with modern western civilization is the lack of passion for building new things (and this extends to fertility), and we need to treat that by having more enthusiasm for building new things. Building a new suburb isn't a vision for an exciting new future, it's just yet another retirement community. Build a new city state for our children! And also have children for that bright future.
Seems cart before horse-ish.
The correlating factor seems to be social cohesion and low stratification at first glance; seeing as birth rate tracks with either desperate dirt grubing peasantry or low income inequality (at least in the US), but there are countries out their with pretty ok equality and high cohesion that also have a low birth rate so who knows.
Maybe it is eco-doomerism in both senses; I know I will not be having kids probably ever 'cause I'm comfortably wealthy if I'm single but not if I'm not, and I'm fairly confidante that the world is going to get worse both economically and ecologically and will not get better unless the AGI acolites are right; in which case it will get much better or end.
The world has been getting better economically ever since the industrial revolution began.
> Build a new city state for our children!
Building cities from scratch by fiat is very rare and usually only happens with a coercive autocracy. Cities benefit from strong network effects, so you can't normally create them from scratch unless the government is able to forcibly move large numbers of people at once.
Also, all the best geographical spots are already taken by natural cities.
I think suburbs tend to be populated by commuters, while exurbs might have more retirees.
Approximately everybody had high fertility at that time. Singapore probably has about average fertility for a rich city.
You can listen to fragments of this book on a "Voices of the past" primary source narration youtube channel:
First Japanese Visitor to USA Describes American Life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvPxCuIspWs
First Japanese Visitor After Sakoku Describes European Life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drIt0EIIteA
First Japanese Visitor to US + Europe Describes Birth of Modern Japan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wv5615ppOY
Tangentially - It is also available in a digitized version on Archive.org
https://archive.org/details/autobiographyofy0000fuku_o2m4
Why would the horse-drawn carriages in California be surprising?
I could be wrong, but IIRC in Japan horses were treated as weapons of war, and reserved exclusively for the samurai, as combat mounts.
At the time Japan exited isolation it was forbidden for vehicles to travel on the highways, which were built and mostly reserved for military and government use. Ordinary people traveled by foot or on horseback, but wheeled vehicles were outlawed. The Shogunate preferred stability to efficiency in all things, and part of that is controlling the movement of people and goods.
https://d-arch.ide.go.jp/je_archive/english/society/wp_je_unu9.html
I remember early in the book Fukuzawa talking quite a bit about how he needed to walk when travelling between home town, Nagasaki, Osaka, and Edo.
Wheeled vehicles? I thought human-pulled rickshaws were common, but perhaps that's only for intra-urban rather than inter-urban transportation.
Rickshaws didn't appear in Japan until 1869, shortly after the ban on wheeled vehicles ended.
No paving at the time, and generally quite muddy, narrow streets.
Wheeled vehicles were comparatively rare in Japan at the time. The narrow, uneven mountainous inter-city roads made them impractical for longer journeys, and the cities would have been too dense to allow for their use there either. Sedan chairs or walking were the main mode of transportation for both shorter and longer distances. Horseback riding also happened but it was less common due to restrictions on who could ride horses and where.
Aside from a fair bit of tense confusion (present to past to present to past, sometimes back and forth in the same sentence) and not a whole lot of analysis compared to summary...this was very entertaining, and had a real, satisfying flow.
Although it also weirdly skipped right over the whole overthrow of the Shogunate, and Restoration of the Emperor, and total change of course by the leaders of the Restoration in favour of wholesale Westernisation...if I didn't already know that happened I'd be completely confused.
I definitely got confused there. I expected the word “Meiji” to appear in a review of a book about a figure in late 19th century Japan who was involved in westernization, but I don’t actually know what the word means, and this review didn’t help!
"Meiji" was emperor at the time of the downfall of the shogunate, and thus the first emperor of the post-Edo era, and also a major reformer who oversaw the rapid industrialization of Japan (as well as nationalism, promotion of Shinto, the cult of the emperor, etc.)
And Japan retains the (very ancient) custom of doing calendars by regnal year, so the period in which he was emperor, from 1868-1912, is the Meiji era. Currently we're in the Reiwa era, year six, although as era names are posthumous names you shouldn't use that name for the reigning emperor.
(actually I think it was a bit less 1-to-1 pre-restoration, ironically enough)
The ironic part is that tying era names to the emperor only started with Meiji. I actually learned that from this review, after getting confused about how they went from Kaei to Ansei so quickly:
> “It was not until the sixth year of Kaei (1853) that a steamship was seen for the first time; it was only in the second year of Ansei (1855) that we began to study navigation from the Dutch in Nagasaki"
I looked it up and it turns out that prior to Meiji, the courts proclaimed new eras frequently whenever they felt like it, not just when a new emperor took power, and the eras typically lasted under 10 years.
Edit: I see you mentioned that too.
Thank you for this review. It's fascinating material. By the way, Fukuzawa is mistakenly referred to as "Fuzukawa" in the 5th paragraph.
I feel like I learned a lot from this review. I greatly appreciate the image of the ¥10,000 note, without which I would have read the entire thing with the wrong interpretation of his "gracefully curled back hair".
I was curious if the San Francisco photograph was preserved, found it here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fukuzawa_Yukichi_with_the_girl_of_the_photo_studio.jpg
Thnx.
This photo should also be inserted into the review. It's awesome. Thanks for sharing.
This is a fascinating book, and I'm very glad this got reviewed. This review is a pretty good treatment of it, and I particularly appreciate that the reviewer applies their perspective as an American who has lived in modern Japan.
My big complaint about this review is that it focuses mostly on the early part of the book. More than half of the review focuses on Fukuzawa's early life prior to his arrival in Edo, which is barely a quarter of the book (92 out of 337 pages in my copy). The first-hand glimpse at the closing decades of pre-Perry-Expedition Japan from the perspective of a young man born into a minor Samurai family is an interesting and important part of the book, but I found most of the rest of the book just as interesting and important, and much of that was treated only in passing or not at all. There's a full chapter on the European mission (two sentences in the review), and the second visit to America is completely omitted. And after returning to Japan from the last expedition, Fukuzawa founded the first English-language school in Japan and in this capacity he did a fair amount of advocacy for Japan to learn from Western practices (liberalization of law and culture as well as pedagogical methods) rather than the traditional focus on China as the only foreign country worth studying. I suspect the reviewer ran out of time and/or energy as the deadline came up and had to rush through most of the material; if so, I encourage them to write an expanded review and publish it separately, as I would very much like to read that.
I read this book primarily as a narrative about the aftermath of First Contact. It's a very familiar theme in science fiction, both humans (modern, past, or near-to-middle future) being contacted by advanced aliens and farther-future humans making contact with more primitive aliens. Some of the earliest works in the genre, such as H.G. Wells's "War of the Worlds", were explicit allegories for European imperialism. Fukuzawa's autobiography takes the perspective of a central figure in a real-life situation of a culture that's undergoing the consequences of being contacted by more technologically advanced European cultures.
Thank you! Welcome information. This was a fine and clever "book-review" aimed at ACX readers, but it left me wondering, what kinda book it really is. "337 pages" - helped!
That the reviewer covered only part of the material was evident for me, even as someone who hasn't read the book.
"Many islands in Japan are now populated by more cats than people. There’s not a shortage of promising sites."
I don't think this is actually true - (the second sentence, not the first). One of the big reasons Japan has such famously dense, urban cities is the lack of land. It's a modestly-sized island chain that's 80% mountains, and a lot of other parts are going to have religious/cultural/ecological significance.
I don't think there's really an abundance of promising sites for the Japanese government to just slap down some big Gaijin-opolis, even assuming there was the political will and funding for that sort of thing. A smallish Prospera-styled charter city, maybe. But probably not anything that's going to put a dent in the population curve.
To be a bit more concrete here, if we're looking at like a Singapore-styled city-state model, Singapore is 750 km^2, looking at this list of Japanese islands <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_islands_of_Japan_by_area>, there's 10 islands above 700 sq km... and half of those are the main five Japanese islands (counting Okinawa), and two of them are disputed by Russia, and the least populated of the remaining three (Tsushima) already has 30K people living on it. (I'm not sure how many cats, however)
Technically Singapore was less than 600 km^2 originally, but it doesn't change your point much
America's ultralarge cities could be far denser, it's just that NIMBYs won't let that happen. Agricultural land is still 13% of Japan's total land area:
https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Japan/Percent_agricultural_land/
That's plenty for a gaijinopolous.
I'm not sure I follow - if you saw my nested comment, I was using Singapore as my reference point, not American cities.
And I'm not sure what the 13% of land being agricultural point was meant to be. That they could just take agricultural land and turn it into a big city? For one, I'm not sure that enough of that land is actually all together in one spot that it could be turned into a city.
For another, Japan is already a dense country with limited farmable land. It already doesn't produce enough food for its people and is reliant on imports, which seems long-term precarious, so removing farm land to build another big city would probably be contentious before even considering more specific details like the actual land owners getting displaced or the idea that you're building it specifically for foreigners.
Most of Japan has a major depopulation problem. It's only the cities that are booming, while the countryside empties out.
> And when you dive into the history of Japan’s modern institutions—the police force, the universities, the banking system, the press—Fuzukawa is there as well.
Typo in the name
Interesting review, although I think the material in the book was handled better than the application to current events. I found the question about Washington's descendants amusing - it is such a clash between Japanese and American values. As an interesting aside, the first shogun was tasked with fighting the "shrimp barbarians." It's a shame this naming convention didn't catch on elsewhere; shrimp barbarians sound so much more exotic than Celts or Gauls.
> Though I must say, having lived for nearly two years in Japan, I have never been treated poorly.
I knew a fellow who lived in Japan for a number of years as an English teacher. He said that there were certain establishments he would be turned away at the door - and the staff would tell him "no gaijins allowed." He seemed to find a certain anti-foreigner sentiment still going strong in some places. He ended up marrying a Japanese woman who used him to immigrate to the US and then dumped him, so I imagine his experience was colored by bitterness in the end. This fellow also talked about arbitrary rules and customs in the school system. There was a strict policy against hair dye. Some children had naturally lighter brown hair, instead of the typical very dark brown/black color. They were endlessly harassed by teachers who they had to convince of their natural coloration.
How fluent was your friend? I don't want to make any assumptions but I do find that a lot of the 'cant fit in' crowd never bother learning the language.
In my experience as someone living here and who does speak the language, a good 90% of the 'no foreigners' places will happily let you in if you reply in fluent Japanese with a 'dont worry, I speak Japanese'. The other ten percent unfortunately does exist but you kind of have to go looking for them.
Anti foreigner sentiment absolutely exists, but tends to be either a) pretty reasonable annoyance at tourists disrupting the social harmony or b) behind closed doors - those that don't like foreigners just avoid them. Which I have to say is a lot easier to live with than the versions of xenophobia I've seen in other countries.
The hair thing has been spoken about in the news but was a bit sensationalized imo. I've never worked at a japanese school though so can't speak from experience.
He was hired to teach Japanese kids English so he had to be fluent in both languages by necessity. I got the impression from him that he ran into xenophobia from time to time but it wasn't frequent.
I would never presume to evaluate a review of a book I had not read, and I haven't read this one (and will not).
However, as an ARTICLE, a STORY, this was fabulous!
I really think book reviews should not be so long.
Most interesting, concisely written, informative - thanks! I was wondering if the autobiography mentioned marriage? - all we read was about his young, then adult, sons. I can imagine that marriage might have been another crux in the life of a man who punctured so many traditional norms.
Good weitten https://simscale.blogspot.com/?m=1
In general I enjoyed this review a lot, especially that it's about an era I don't know very much about.
"So I was surprised to learn that the mustachioed man on the ¥1,000 note with which I purchased my daily bento box was a bacteriologist. It was a pleasant surprise, though. It seems to me that a society that esteems bacteriologists over politicians is in many ways a healthy one."
Bacteriologist? This never comes up again, the rest of the review implies that he's primarily a linguist. Was it a mistake? Did I miss something?
They're different people. Fukuzawa is the one on the 10k note, not the 1k note.
Thank you! It looked like I was missing something!
Someone could have told Fukuzawa that Washington did not have any biological descendants (he had adopted children from Martha's first marriage).
The Japanese, particularly in the Tokugawa Shogunate period, regularly practiced adult adoption and didn't seem to consider it significantly inferior to natural progeny, so I don't know that that detail would have mattered much.
>also amazed by the prices of groceries in California
Was he amazed by how high they were, or how low, or what?
High (not from review but from source material), he is astounded at how expensive oysters are (half dollar for jar of them vs cents in Japan).
I love the review, but would drop the last section, it detracts from it, except for the very last sentence, which could round the whole thing up nicely.
I was thinking the same myself. The last section is very jarring (and not particularly well thought out, even.)
Very well written, and thoroughly enjoyed.
I liked the review, but overall I feel the section on cities and birth rates detracted from the piece
Fukuzawa must have been SO humble that they put his face on the 10,000 yen because none of the accomplishments described are giving me face-on-dollar legacy.
This is a fun and charming review which left me wondering if the book itself is equally fun and charming.
This review started out great, but was ruined by the ending.
Incidentally, it seems dishonest to mention the 2020 crime increase without also mentioning that crime has since gone back down most of the way. Of course, there are far bigger problems with the charter city concept anyway.
Yeah, the line "a large group of wealthy and competent people desperately seeking a functional urban space to live and work " made me laugh. Does the USA really lack functional urban spaces to live and work? Is the whole country now the same as the bad parts of San Francisco?
I loved the section at the end. That’s always the question about the lessons of history, isn’t it? Given that things are different now, how do we apply them? Those samurai knew that for their ancestors the key to success was ‘fight hard on the right side in civil wars’; but with no civil war going on, what were they to do?
For developing Asia, one of the keys to success was always ‘find an advanced power and learn what they have to teach (even at the cost of your traditional values)’; but once catchup growth peters out, how do we apply that lesson?
I dunno if Gaijinohama is the right answer, but it is an attempt to do this kind of thinking.
The references to Dejima and the Dutch reminds me of one of David Mitchells great novels, "The thousand autumns of Jacob De Zoet". Brillian book, probably should re-read it as I have done with "Cloud Atlas".
Also, the notion of building a "Dejima 2.0" would probably work well with the "Seasteading" enthusiasts in Silicon Valley, who says that "Dejima 2.0" should be less artificial an island than the first?
Great review, but what a tease to end on! I assume you're planning to expand those last five paragraphs to a full essay?
My review of the review, for reference when voting:
The review is well written, and it's got an interesting subject. I wish I'd gotten more of a sense of Fukuzawa's personality, though. (Although maybe that light touch is intentional, as some sort of homage to the subject's approach to education?) I think too much of it is a summary, albeit a good one: most of it reads like a really good wikipedia entry, maybe one of the ones cribbed from the 1910 Encyclopaedia Britannica. I don't get enough of a sense of why this book is fascinating and why I should read it. It was pleasantly short, but in this case I'd have preferred it to include a bit more.
Random notes:
It sounds like learning English (or Dutch) was the equivalent to learning to program computers, a few decades ago.
I don't read the same facial expression from the money as was described, but that's probably on me.
Following the last link, I liked photograph 15, "A cat leaps at the photographer to snatch his lunch snack"...
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2015/03/a-visit-to-aoshima-a-cat-island-in-japan/386647/#img15
This states that that the ship Fukuzawa was on would "be the first Japanese ship ever to cross the Pacific Ocean". This seems to contradict the Wikipedia page that says this ship, the Kanrin Maru
was second, after the 'San Juan Bautista' crossed in 1614 (a ship not just operated by Japan as the Kanrin Maru was, but actually built in Japan).
Not sure if this is a mistake on the part of Fukuzawa himself (not surprising if it was more than 200 years before his time!), our reviewer conducting independent research, or Wikipedia simply being wrong though!
I stopped reading after the intro because i decided i was going to read it. I too have recently moved to japan and because of the smaller english section at the library i alternate between western canon and english translations of popular japanese authors. So currently Taiko, then Dracula, next this one.
Note that his hometown was "Nakatsu" (中津) not "Nankatsu".
I think it's worth mentioning that the institute he founded which ended up being part of Tokyo University, a bit less than 50 years later, was one of the groups involved in Unit 731's bioweapons work during WWII, and the university he founded had several contributions as well. Perhaps this goes under the heading: don't ask a man his salary, a woman her age, or a Japanese microbiology research center what they did during WWII.
I guess the lesson we should all learn is that even the best intentioned people working in a system which is evil ends up contributing to that system.
So he learned Dutch, looked at the system around him, and said, "We hebben een serieus probleem!"
I also loved this review. I didn't mean to read this all the way through at first and was just skimming it but found that I couldn't put it down. Great work.
This was a fantastic review - I was fortunate enough to be an exchange student in Japan 30+ years ago and to have had a moderate amount of professional interaction with the country, so I had a general sense of Fukuzawa's relevance, but no idea how fascinating his journey was. Thank you!
High-skill immigration to Japan is not particularly difficult, despite stereotypes of Japan being xenophobic. The main issue is that Japanese wages for skilled workers are low by developed world standards, and isn't even high by developing world standards after adjusting for COL in certain fields like software development. English-speaking countries are also more preferred by skilled immigrants.
Singapore fills the niche of functional Asian English-speaking city-state. However, Japan does have a lower cost of living. I think the appeal of Japan is often in the megacities and how it's well-connected by HSR and soon maglev, and that would be lost in an artificial island for foreigners.
It's worth noting that the U.S. and the rest of Western Hemisphere is fairly crime-ridden by global standards, and most of Eurasia is relatively safe in comparison. It's unclear if Japan has some sort of unique advantage compared to UAE, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Turkey, Spain, Portugal etc.
https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2022&displayColumn=1
The main thing that sucks about Japan is the work culture. If you are a "digital nomad" you can completely avoid that and Japan will be fine. However, most digital nomads just visit countries on tourist visas, and find applying for a digital nomad visa to be too much of a hassle. Japan is a developed country with 123 million people, tourism and short-term workers will only improve the economy marginally because the total Japanese economy is still quite large. Also, digital nomads disproportionately spend on short-term housing relative to other services, which is often perceived negatively.
The bad white-collar work culture makes Japan good in some ways, as low white-collar productivity and high factory worker productivity means more income equality and less tension between social classes.
A fantastic review until the author decided to interject a combination of cultural imperialism and utter ignorance of Japanese society onto an appallingly uninformed understanding of economics and history.
Japan’s travails are not rocket science - a depression over twice as long as the American Great Depression is what happens when you meekly accept feudal economic subservience to the West in the form of the Plaza Accords. And Japanese politeness to foreigners is much more pity for appallingly impolite and ignorant behavior (due to not being Japanese) than anything else. For example: most foreigners who manage to become functionally fluent in Japanese also talk like women… because teaching Japanese to foreigners is pretty much the lowest status job imaginable. Combine that with classrooms that are 90%+ male with 95%+ female teachers - it is unsurprising that insufficiently observant foreigners don’t notice that women speak differently to other women vs men, ditto vs superiors, children etc.
I know a guy who married a Japanese woman and had 2 kids with her; worked in and around Japan for 15 years and nobody ever told him he talked like a girl or a guy from Shinjuku Ni Chome (think Castro district in SF).
I am still boggles by 15 years of formal meetings and informal beer drinking where NOT ONE JAPANESE let him in on it.
That’s Japan.
The ending section seems a bit weaker, but otoh I’m a sucker for ending on a callback like that. Very good piece overall.
This review... follows precedent! :)
I thought this was an amusing read that didn't quite come together as a whole. I don't think the author "reviewed" the book much at all, rather they simply recapped some interesting bits from it, which painted Fukuzawa as an interesting character but nothing more. I neither got a good sense of what the book is like, nor how Fukuzawa's contributions to Japan were significant enough that he ended up on the 10,000 Yen note.
The concluding section was especially puzzling, and seemed to me quite disconnected from the rest of the review. Apologies if I'm being too harsh.