OpenAI is an AI research and deployment company. OpenAI's mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. We are an unofficial community. OpenAI makes ChatGPT, GPT-4, and DALL·E 3.
Official OpenAI Links
Sora
ChatGPT
DALL·E 3
Blog
Discord
YouTube
GitHub
Careers
Help Center
Docs
Related Subreddits
r/artificial
r/ChatGPT
r/Singularity
r/MachineLearning
r/GPTStore
r/dalle2
account activity
ImageImage 2.0 is now online on ChatGPT and it's incredible! Just a few days ago even 3x3 grids would often struggle, now we can 10x the complexity, and it's near perfect! (i.redd.it)
submitted 1 month ago by Alex__007
[–]Alex__007[S] 11 points12 points13 points 1 month ago (2 children)
Prompt:
Create a 10 × 10 grid of 100 different topics representing recent technological progress. Use a realistic, polished editorial illustration style. Each topic should appear in its own square with a short clear label underneath. Keep the grid neat on a white background. Make every topic visually different and every label correctly spelled. Use these row themes: Row 1: AI models and agents Row 2: robotics Row 3: semiconductors and compute Row 4: networks and smart devices Row 5: biotech and health technology Row 6: energy and power systems Row 7: transport and autonomy Row 8: space and aerospace Row 9: manufacturing and materials Row 10: climate and environmental technology. Show each tile as a realistic mini-scene, product-class object, lab instrument, robot, chip, vehicle, or device that clearly conveys the topic. Keep the overall style consistent, modern, realistic, and visually impressive.
[–]SaltField3500 -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago (1 child)
<image>
The same prompt in Gemini in Portuguese. I even found it more accurate.
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Nice!
[–]biopticstream 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Can confirm, appears to be able to actually output 16:9 images, which is nice. https://chatgpt.com/share/69e6ee8e-1b38-83ea-8184-adf8c073c624
[–]Kathane37 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago (0 children)
The model keep the trends strong after nano banana 2. Crazy that it can explain complex subject so clearly
[–]Tomorrow_Previous 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Really a crazy model. This is supposed to be a screenshot of a game inspired by 2 other ones. "Create an image of a video game screenshot of a made up videogame. This non existent videogame is a mix between Morrowind and Star Wars"
[–]Knever 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (3 children)
Has there been an announcement?
[–]Alex__007[S] 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
Not yet. Apparently some got it early but some are still on image V1.5.
[–]mozzarellaguy 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (1 child)
How do we know which model do we get
Try 10x10 grid with labels. Check correctness and consistency. Old one sometimes makes errors in 3x3 and can't do 5x5, never mind 10x10.
[–]girlgamerpoi 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
That's really insane. I remember there was a time I asked it to generate a picture based on a thesis and it generated jumbos.
[–]PBorealis 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Yooooo this is so good for character sheets
[–]mphermes 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
Six fingered robot hands
[–]torac 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (1 child)
There are a couple of small issues. "Cobots" (87), weird foldable (40), EV-batteries showing a weird card instead (62)…
Incomparable to previous attempts to generate more than a dozen distinct objects with text. A leap forward.
[–]Alex__007[S] 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Yes, not perfect on 10x10, but now very close. Previously even 3x3 would sometimes fail and 4x4 would usually fail.
[–]LordWilmore2020 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
is this 2.0?
[–]Alex__007[S] 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Yes, for sure
[–]Oswolrf 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Not working for me.
[–]No-Philosopher3977 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I created the front page of a newspaper for a fictional world and it got it. I also created an anatomy diagram that was nearly perfectly labeled
[–]m3kw 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
So I can ask it to generate 50 different pics in a grid like that? It will save lots of money
Yes, correct
[–]Hoppss 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Is it still pretty censored for copyrighted characters and designs?
Not the ones I tried. But I guess depends.
[–]LargeLanguageModelo 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Just tested, did a couple images with trusses, which usually has been botched in the past IME. So far, very impressed, definitely have some application for this to integrate into projects via the API.
[–]FinancialMoney6969 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Okay this is great but how long until its nerf'd
Why would it ever get nerfed? The incentive is to keep the quality and push down the limits, nudging people to upgrade their plans.
[–]onyxlabyrinth1979 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
It’s impressive, but i always wonder how stable this is under real usage. Demos look clean, then you hit edge cases and things get weird fast. I'm wondering how consistent it stays across prompts and sessions, especially if you try to build anything repeatable on top of it.
[–]Illustrious_Site_162 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
the new model is ridonculously good but it also brings the concern of faster limit usage like Claude. Does anyone know the actual limit for it? is it hourly or daily?
[–]KirbyTheCat2 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (12 children)
Works great... until they downgrade the quality to save $$$.
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (11 children)
GPT Image 1 or 1.5 was never downgraded, they just decreased usage limits.
I hope they do the same going forward. Waiting is ok if you are still getting access to frontier AI.
[–]expera 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (10 children)
You got proof of that?
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (6 children)
Just my personal experience. I used both quite a lot.
[–]expera -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago (5 children)
So no? I have opposing anecdotal evidence. But what’s more likely? They maintained token count or decreased to save money?
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (4 children)
In my experience decreased limits to save money. At some point I started getting asked to wait before generating the next image after just a few generations. But maybe it’s dynamic and depends on usage and regions, and they are AB testing different approaches to savings. Who knows.
[–]FinancialMoney6969 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
idk how people take the word of a billiondollar company rather than multiple REAL PEOPLE that experience the nerfs daily.... OP humble yourself
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
I’m not arguing that there are no nerfs. You can nerf the quality, or you can nerf the limits, or both, or even nerf different things for different people to AB test the responses. I did not experience a drop in quality, but I did experience tighter limits.
You're talking about limits. limits have nothing to do with QUALITY which is constantly mentioned literally everyday throughout this entire 2-4 year journey. You can easily tell when they degrade the models. idk how you're even arguing with me about this... no1 is aruging "tighter limits" they can changed the "limit" whenever they want and its damn near impossible to calculate, no point in arguing that
quality is very quantifiable
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago* (0 children)
I personally have not seen any drops in quality, for any OpenAI models. Maybe someone else can easily tell, maybe someone else is just confused. Not my experience.
The only properly documented changes in quality I saw were when OpenAI was changing between different model fine-tunes for GPT-4 and 4o, without announcing it. You could still select what you needed on API but not in the chat.
Now it's less of a problem, since every new iteration is announced and you have access at least to several latest ones (5.2, 5.3, 5.4) directly in the chat if you are a paid subscriber. And if you really need a particular version that's no longer available in the chat, API is there.
[–]LargeLanguageModelo -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago (2 children)
lol, do you?
[–]expera 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Why would I have proof of the thing I don’t believe?
Well, damn, I dunno. Didn't see you weren't Kirby (who made the positive assertion of nerfing the model).
π Rendered by PID 170142 on reddit-service-r2-comment-8686858757-bg4x2 at 2026-06-03 02:03:27.170444+00:00 running 9e1a20d country code: US.
[–]Alex__007[S] 11 points12 points13 points (2 children)
[–]SaltField3500 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]biopticstream 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]Kathane37 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]Tomorrow_Previous 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]Knever 1 point2 points3 points (3 children)
[–]Alex__007[S] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]mozzarellaguy 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]girlgamerpoi 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]PBorealis 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]mphermes 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]torac 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]LordWilmore2020 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Oswolrf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]No-Philosopher3977 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]m3kw 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Hoppss 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]LargeLanguageModelo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]FinancialMoney6969 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]onyxlabyrinth1979 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Illustrious_Site_162 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]KirbyTheCat2 0 points1 point2 points (12 children)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (11 children)
[–]expera 0 points1 point2 points (10 children)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children)
[–]expera -1 points0 points1 point (5 children)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–]FinancialMoney6969 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]FinancialMoney6969 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Alex__007[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]LargeLanguageModelo -1 points0 points1 point (2 children)
[–]expera 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]LargeLanguageModelo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)