Dismiss this pinned window
top 500 comments
sorted by:
best
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]GoudaMane 830 points831 points  (204 children)

porn is gonna go crazy in a couple years

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 385 points386 points  (175 children)

Porn has already gone crazy, if this decreases human exploitation of women used as chattel by (Some unethical agents ) it gets my vote

[–]deftoast 253 points254 points  (66 children)

If anything, a lot of OF girls are gonna be mad.

[–]Denaton_ 46 points47 points  (19 children)

Unless they just use AI themselves..

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points  (1 child)

OnlyDudes incoming!!!!!

[–]BopDoBop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OnlyGranpas as well !!! :D

[–]Colon 4 points5 points  (9 children)

but.. this will only last for as long as people don’t make all porn/entertainment themselves. which the ease of use and power of models/hardware indicates will only be a few years (a decade max?) til ‘anyone’ can make whatever the hell they want as long as they can type sentences and reference other media they like. what we’ve seen with AI in 2 years is like iphone 1G -> iphone 19 max pro XL

[–]indianninja2018 1 point2 points  (7 children)

See, I dont think that is going to be the case. Consuming shall always be easier than creating. Case in point everyone can write, but not all readers are writers. Plus there is the sense of not knowing what will happen with a content someone else has generated, and with yours you already know what will happen.

[–]Colon 1 point2 points  (6 children)

i think you’re underestimating how easy it could potentially be. like: “i want a 2 hr romantic comedy starring Leo and Emma Stone set on a shipwrecked island with pirates” and boom, AI starts generating a movie based on 100 years of archived scripts and peppers it in with twists and turns as described in articles about effective narrative beat changes. not really more difficult than sitting down and channel surfing, cause everyone can describe what they’d LIKE to see, even if it doesn’t exist yet

we’re all thinking about language models and diffusion models etc as separate, cause they kinda are at the moment- that’ll all join up like Voltron soon

[–]JoolioPanda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

or maybe ai knows what you like better than you

[–]indianninja2018 2 points3 points  (4 children)

I do understand that. However I always believe that this thing will eventually make the things more same-y. The thing you are saying will still require a lot of compute, and not everyone, I am speaking everyone in the sense of almost 8 billion of us, would have access to such things. And when something will be deliberately be worked with a story, a theme and such, it will not be a salad made by a machine that doesn't understand what a salad is. AI is a tool. There shall always be people who can use the tool better. Case in point civitAI models that have good prompts tend to look stunning in comparison to basic ones. Chatgpt, which has consumed a lot, often makes very formulatic stories and these are also usually censored and such.

Imagine someone likes to watch something like that... They prompt it, and get a mediocre result, and keep prompting same-y things 100 days straight. Each of the movies produced will have to be fundamentally different to actually feel good to watch. AI, the narrow AI we have now, does not have insight about anything and as long as it remains that way we would not see hugely creative ideas come from it. (Also likely that it will triangulate and go towards the average, like the 1girl face that is seen across models unless you work on it.

So even when AI gets a lot better, for quality works where humans and AI work together shall be better where Human is not involved and AI works alone without any idea how the world actually works.

[–]deadzenspider 0 points1 point  (3 children)

You’re assuming what you are referring to as “ai” is the same thing you know today. It might not happen in 3, 5, 10, 20 years but eventually, 50? 100? “AI” will be self referential, apparently as conscious as humans, infinitely smarter, more creative and unpredictable. At that point the cliche line, at this point, of “AI is just a tool and humans will always be needed to … fill in the blank” will no longer be possible to say with a straight face. Humans will still be here but essentially be irrelevant in so many ways regarding creativity and productivity. This will be embraced, the world will be better for it and humans will still create stuff in the way that humans still practice chess even though no human can beat a basic chess ai today. So yes the AI genie will cook up the nth season of your favorite tv show and it will be great.

[–]indianninja2018 0 points1 point  (2 children)

AGI is not reached yet. Besides, present day AI, with how it works, will NEVER be conscious. I am all up for letting it be better, but a truly conscious AI requires things to be working differently from how prompt based it is. That being said AI can of course someday be conscious, with a different architecture. AI may become more creative and all that, though I doubt it as we have essentially exhausted more data to train it better. In future a lot of present day Ai gen garbage shall be fed back into it. Genericness is a problem here.

That being said, I would not mind if this happens. But I will believe it when I see it. Such development usually comes through companies that can spend on such compute, and wherher or not that kind of AI will be left to people to tinker with (as otherwise their AI like chatgpt will have censorship), that is something to see.

Generative AI has been there since 80s tbh. AGI and sentient AI, I will accept when they finally do it.

[–]SalsaRice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only issue with this is most people are dumb and/or impatient. You can do so much more with a gaming pc than a console..... but you gotta know how to use a computer, how to set things up, modding requires some extra knowledge, etc.

Alot people struggle hitting the "on" button on the console. Using a pc for anything as complex as running ai generative stuff is 100% not on the table for them, unless it is purposely designed to be as simple as possible. It's like the famous quote about how difficult it is to design bear-proof trashcans; there's too much overlap between the smart bears and the bottom 20%-40% of people.

[–]BezisThings 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Then guys can also make a killing from this shit finally.

[–]Denaton_ 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You need to register with an ID, verify and comply with their ToS..

[–]MixedRealityAddict 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People will refuse to pay them and just create their own personal videos using the OF models faces 😂

[–]No_Reference_9984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But everyone can make an OF page of a hot girl in the future .. even dudes who weighs 300 pounds .. it's not limited to Real OF girls right? I can imagine that you can transform a guy's voice into a woman's voice in real time in the near future so even cam babes are in trouble

[–]RIckardur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i used an Ai pic for my linkedin.

[–]kruthe 94 points95 points  (1 child)

When are they not?

[–]sukihasmu 20 points21 points  (0 children)

[–]Appropriate_Ant_4629 32 points33 points  (36 children)

If anything, a lot of OF girls are gonna be mad.

Except those that embrace the technology.

Imagine how efficient they'll be if they can have an AI cranking out videos in their image.

Or if they can get trademark rights for their signature moves - and charge all the AI companies every time an AI imitates their likeness or movements.

[–]b0r3den0ugh2behere 27 points28 points  (3 children)

Signature moves??? Lol

[–]Sweet-Assist8864 6 points7 points  (0 children)

WAIT they’re doing MY bootytwerk 360 no scope. i have that trademarked!

[–]Gideonbh 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That gawk gawk 3000

[–]No_Reference_9984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes didn't you know that every girl on OF spreads their legs a different way?

[–]kruthe 33 points34 points  (17 children)

Choreography isn't subject to copyright.

[–]FailedRealityCheck 14 points15 points  (3 children)

if they can have an AI cranking out videos in their image

That would probably be the most tame way to leverage the tech. Furries, elves, no reason to stick to human anatomy… triple boob girl like in Total Recall… There is no telling where this is going.

[–]calamity_unbound 8 points9 points  (1 child)

We know where this is going.

https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2013/08/23/dream-big

[–]obscuredreference 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a Trekkie, I approve, except that Kirk’s Enterprise (in any of its versions) is of course far superior.  

 In Scotty’s own words, “she’s a well endowed lady!”

[–]RhapsMarieHayden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's already a Triple boob girl on OnlyFans. She had surgery for it though

[–]TheGreenHaloMan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Honestly yeah, the technology will happen, and if I can just crank out the weird requests they want without actually doing them? Fuck yeah I would do it. People bought bathwater, this is a no brainer

[–]ScrapEngineer_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trademarking moves, I don't know what you smoked but u I want it. Must be some strong stuff.

[–]Windmill_flowers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine how efficient they'll be if they can have an AI cranking out videos in their image.

But if they can generate it... What stops their subscribers from generating it themselves and cancelling their subscriptions?

[–]MixedRealityAddict 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impossible when we have open source models that can be ran locally lol. OF models are going to take an extreme pay cut in the next 2-3 years.

[–]Cheatobro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy shit that was the dumbest thing I read today

[–]No_Reference_9984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you need their likeness in the future though? Everyone can create a hot beautiful AI girl in the future. Why should everybody not be able to create a hot OF babe? I guess in the near future you can transform a guy's voice into a woman's voice with lip sync as well and then it is game over.

[–]balalofernandez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can even finetune a model with their moves and then copy the style from a different person and have multiple copies of "her".

[–]persona0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup pretty much and you know famous people will be suing the crap out of idiots who try a e make money off their like ess and name

[–]Realistic_Studio_930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

here's a little known secret :D but dont tell anyone, because most dont relise it.....

women like porn too...... shhhhhhh.
women are more simmilar to men than they would like to admin, dont believe me? ask any married man, they can be kinky and pure filth while making your heart flutter.

i personally love women, absolutly beutiful creatures (when there not trying to kill you).
i cant keep my eyes off of them, because im too busy keeping my hands off of them :P.

i was always taught to appreciate fine art.

another life lesson - you can look but you cannot touch (unless you learn psychology and practice reading body lanuage, then sometimes you can touch!) :P

appreciation is not sexist.

[–]Elegant-End3836 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Or they become good at ai

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what tech boyfriends are for but there will be a long line waiting to apply for the job

[–]persona0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If has also decreased the exploitation of woman by said shady seedy men... Now they can freely exploit you pay pigs personally which I agree with

[–]darkkite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i doubt it. the ones making money offer more than just pics. they collab, podcast and do other stuff.

they already outsource the actual chatting with someone. and some have already made AI versions of themselves

[–]Sprite_is_the_best 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you mad that they profit off of your horniness. Maybe don’t buy only fans?

[–]Mysterious_Yak3252 0 points1 point  (1 child)

if anything they should be profiting from ai. They have the ability to take pictures of themselves and create the highest quality LoRA files and not share with anyone else. They can create any setting, any style, any scene for their customers with their own body without having to actually do any of the actions. If I where an OF model, I would 100% be using ai and selling the images and videos. ez money, especially if you already have an audience who isn't exactly paying attention to hands and chins.

[–]yahma 50 points51 points  (3 children)

I think women are gonna be upset about this more than anyone else.

[–]Poly_and_RA 6 points7 points  (2 children)

The small fraction of women who derive an income from porn, perhaps. But while that's more than zero, it's not a large fraction of women in general.

[–]PhysicsOld5918 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They'll still complain about it.

[–]DoktorSleepless 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Women who aren't in porn will have their likeness stolen for AI porn.

[–]nzodd 94 points95 points  (10 children)

"OK, now that you've got your mocap suit on, please perform the follow 700 sex acts so that we can finetune our AI a tiny bit better. Be quick about it, we have 5000 women to go through and only 20 mocap rooms. And, action!"

[–]andzlatin 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is a better alternative - training on existing footage, which there's tons of

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 10 points11 points  (7 children)

I think I saw this on a tv show and it wasn’t even porn… maybe an episode of Blackmirror ?

[–]Appropriate_Ant_4629 14 points15 points  (4 children)

A 1981 SciFi film by Michael Crichton!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looker

The villains would hire models that they'd scan into the computer making 3d models they'd profit from and then kill the models.

Looker is a 1981 American science fiction thriller film[1][4] written and directed by Michael Crichton,

... it is the first commercial film to attempt to use a computer-generated, three-dimensional, solid-looking model of a whole human body ... Looker was also the first film to create three-dimensional (3D) shading with a computer,[6] months before the release of the better-known Tron.

Underrated prophetic vision in that otherwise mediocre film.

[–]DPC_1 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Crichton really was a renaissance man. Amazing how a former physician molded or was involved in so many advances in entertainment (westworld had the first truly computer generated + live action effect) and pop-cultures relationship with emerging science and its ramifications when applied without consideration. What a life, shame he died so relatively young. His views on climate change were a choice, but yeah.

[–]Appropriate_Ant_4629 3 points4 points  (1 child)

He also essentially propheciezed the Boeing 737 Max:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airframe_(novel)

...a sensor in the plane's wing to malfunction, which produced an error message in the cockpit. This error message could be cleared by deploying and retracting the plane's slats. Although deploying the slats would change the shape of the wing, the N-22's autopilot could adjust without incident. However, the pilot at the time of the accident .. who was not certified to fly the N-22; he manually overcorrected, overriding the autopilot and sending the plane into a series of oscillations. ... ruining future sales just as surely as any N-22 safety issues would

[–]staybeam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wild. Reminds me of that book that predicted the Titanic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wreck_of_the_Titan:_Or,_Futility

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much, you saved me ( pathological driven trivia nerd) hours of searching

[–]Ayatanne 9 points10 points  (1 child)

blackmirror had nothing like that

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your right, I just checked past episodes and nothing close, thought it might be Black Carbon but Nope. I know I read or watched a scene like this and I’m on the ( purposeless) hunt to find it

[–]Denaton_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They only need one per mocap suit tho..

[–]VacuousCopper 31 points32 points  (23 children)

I mean, this also ends the sexual exploitation of male biologically ingrained sexual desires.

[–]RealBiggly 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's liberating :)

[–]MarsFromSaturn 1 point2 points  (11 children)

Can you explain what this means?

[–]throwawayPzaFm 9 points10 points  (10 children)

Men are sometimes taken to the cleaners by a pretty girl role playing on the internet.

If men can satiate their needs with full custom AI content, this vulnerability is greatly reduced.

[–]MenkyuKan_Twitch_VT 2 points3 points  (2 children)

what is being taken to the cleaners?

[–]Rascals-Wager 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It's slang for being drained of money/possessions

[–]MenkyuKan_Twitch_VT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank yoy

[–]persona0 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You aren't an animal you have greater thinking so if you can't control yourself that's a you thing. It also doesn't end it cause now these dudes will just expect to get any woman with little to no effort on their part. When the FEM bots come then maybe maybe

[–]VacuousCopper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or, these men will prefer the virtual to a real woman who comes along with all sorts of problems. Not to mention that more than we have "rape culture" in the US we absolutely have "exploit men" culture where it is completely and utterly acceptable to take whatever you can con a man into allowing you to take.

You aren't an animal you have greater thinking so if you can't control yourself that's a you thing.

First, I just don't have that problem myself.

Second, blaming people for a lack of self-control is flawed because it ignores the complex interplay of biology, environment, and systemic factors that influence behavior. The belief in free will, rooted in Western and Abrahamic traditions, oversimplifies human decision-making and fosters victim blaming by shifting responsibility onto individuals rather than addressing structural injustices. Additionally, it serves as a tool of cultural imperialism, imposing Western values on other cultures and perpetuating inequality. This narrative prioritizes individual blame over collective responsibility, undermining efforts toward a more just and inclusive society.

[–]Any_Pressure4251 0 points1 point  (2 children)

How? Will this stop men wanting the real thing.

[–]VacuousCopper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this stage of my life, if I were to get a divorce, I don't think I'd ever enter into another serious relationship. I've been through enough to recognize that the energy required for such commitments isn't something I'm willing to expend anymore. I've had my prime years, physically speaking, though I'm still doing pretty well, and so are the women in my age group. But the reality is that relationships demand a level of effort and compromise that I'm no longer inclined to give.

Society has a way of turning even the best intentions into something exploitative, and resisting that pull takes a lot of energy. For some, it's worth the fight, but I’ve come to realize that for me, it’s not. I suspect that many others might feel the same way, whether they admit it or not. There's a lot less suffering when we stop forcing ourselves into situations that don't truly serve us.

In the end, I've found more peace focusing on myself and the friendships where boundaries are easier to maintain. Perhaps this is just the wisdom that comes with age, or maybe it's something more people would understand if they allowed themselves the space to reflect.

TLDR: I personally don't want the real thing.

[–]Robotonist 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Can you elaborate? I’m unclear on what you mean

[–]Lostwhispers05 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Not OP but I'd imagine stuff like OF, and sex-driven marketing tactics sometimes employed by corporations.

Horny bait, essentially.

[–]Robotonist -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Maybe you can help me out here, but why would having the hot singles in your area created by machines to sell you things decrease this exploitation that’s already happening? Seems like it’ll just up the ante and remove the women being used currently which makes the commercials cheaper to make

[–]Peppiniellobrighi 8 points9 points  (1 child)

You're not wrong, but (maybe) the possibility of personally creating custom content will make these tactics obsolete. Why should I be influenced by these commercials if my "needs" are already met in a fully-customised? Or, to put in a Bender-like sentence "Yeah, well, I'm gonna go build my own AI theme park. With blackjack and AI hookers! In fact forget the park" 😂

[–]Select_Truck3257 13 points14 points  (4 children)

they can leave and find a better job, but with less salary, you know it, right?

[–]Enshitification 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They'll just have to go back to serving their customers one at a time, in person.

[–]kruthe 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Learn to code. Oh wait, AI is gonna eat your lunch there too.

[–]Independent-Mail-227 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If AI could replace a coder having a job would be the last of your worries.

[–]Select_Truck3257 0 points1 point  (0 children)

actually no, max is i will checking ai work, just because ai still can't replace my code

[–]Serenafriendzone 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Till Someone find your social media and steal pictures of You and do por.. of your family xd. So going to be epic worse and Is the truth.

Next message from Your friend or foe , hey we have a video of your mom doing this.. and we are sending to anyone if You don't give US x thing we want etc..

Or Even worse childrens.

[–]karakth 22 points23 points  (0 children)

If anything it will make blackmail useless since the victim can just say naw dog thats not me that's AI

[–]kruthe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Shame doesn't exist anymore. Good luck with blackmail these days.

[–]MarsFromSaturn 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Decreases human exploitation, but also increases the chances of you seeing something horrifically obscene with you or your loved ones. Celebs have already started the fight against AI porn. Imagine how humiliating it is for millions of people to see you perform acts you have never done nor consented to doing

[–]buckjohnston 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We'll all become desensitized to it. I will see myself on tv with a strap on someone put on me and breast implants and nobody will care in the future, including myself. It will be just another boring deepfake video even though its perfect recreation. Though I will try to block it all. Actually I won't see myself on tv though because nobody cares, I could only be that lucky. But yeah you need proper parenting and parental controls to block the stuff, I would say no phone or internet access until they are 18, jk that's a bit extreme.

[–]MarsFromSaturn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not to mention that if we eventually somehow crack the code to sentience/consciousness/perception of pain/suffering it will allow the most horrific abuse of artificial minds

[–]yukiarimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know any AI for the uncensored hentai generation?

[–]AdvancedYou1773 1 point2 points  (1 child)

In porn mostly women exploit men for benefits like fame and money. 

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying that is the basic story line of most porn or that in real life, you think that’s why women have sex ?

[–]Ok-Gain9447 2 points3 points  (9 children)

Not only women, but also men is exploited in that industry

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I haven’t researched this yet but I don’t doubt it at all. I would add that there is also a lot of males harmed by its consumption, which of course hurts All society. There have been some studies reporting increase in depression, anxiety and poor self esteem in male porn users. The difficulty (as usual) is determining cause vs correlation. Technology has moved faster than our brains can adapt to.

[–]Ok-Gain9447 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mainly meant the male performers. But agreed users are hurt as well.

[–]MarsFromSaturn 1 point2 points  (6 children)

While true, it is to a much much smaller degree

[–]Ok-Gain9447 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Every man in that industry suffers from severe sex disorders after 5 years because of the pills used, as well a women

[–]MarsFromSaturn 2 points3 points  (4 children)

"Every" is a strong word that you certainly don't have data to back up. Most men don't last 5 years in any industry, let alone porn. You're not wrong that a lot of men suffer because of it, but it is nothing compared to the physical, mental, financial and sexual exploitation of women in the porn industry.

[–]Ok-Gain9447 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Yup my bad, take "every" as something like significantly larger than a normal population . Please let me know if you have any data that backs up the idea of "women performers suffer from industry by significantly more than a men performers"

[–]BEWMarth 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I’ve been very torn over this subject. There are obviously some MAJOR downsides like the generation of immoral AI porn (animal, children, deepfakes)

But like you said, AI porn has a chance to decrease the exploitation of real adult women (and male) victims.

Not to mention the icky idea of AI taking over human creativity. Although I’m not sure if porn was where humanity was getting its most creative ideas.

Idk man. Either it’s sliced, it’s gonna be weird as fuck and I’m not prepared.

[–]MarsFromSaturn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been very torn over this subject

This is the correct take. We should be of two minds when it comes to unprecedented technology. It will absolutely 100% improve the lives of countless individuals, and it will absolutely 100% ruin the lives of countless individuals. There is no preventing either outcome. Both can be true, and I really dislike how black and white these communities become - either you think AI will save the world or you think it will destroy it

[–]sammcj 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It's a complicated issue for sure, I can think of a number of potential implications

  • Potential for decreased exploitation.

however, on the other hand:

  • Potential to take legitimate work away from people that work in the industry, this could lead to redirecting the money that might have gone (partly) be going to the individual model(s)/actor(s) - instead to larger companies that generate content.
  • It could exacerbate already unrealistic perception of peoples bodies or behaviours and worsen the problem of stereotyping groups of people.

And there's a few things that could go either way (and likely both ways):

  • It could "help" those that are lonely or frustrated with their romantic / sexual status - but, is that really a good thing if people end up being connected (or dependant) to something that isn't real and can't truly be a two way relationship.

I think the only way we'll know is looking back in the future after we have some quality data and are either laughing about how stuffy we were - or regretting we didn't put the brakes on soon enough.

The only thing I know for certain - education and communication are critically important.

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to see a backlash with society demanding better rights and working conditions for people who chose ( that’s the keyword) the sex industry over Other corporate exploitations. I personally stopped viewing any porn when I learned about human trafficking for sex industry . How about investing in artisanal porn ? ( not joking but I realize that’s unlikely to solve exploitation in general ) .

[–]Unfair-Basket-7680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly it will prolly make it rare and more valuable.

[–]moschles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Porn has already gone crazy

There are videos of Emma Watson doing porn. They are generated, but it looks just like her.

[–]PN4HIRE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep.

[–]knigitz 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's going to raise unrealistic expectations for a lot of people.

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t current media already do that with who is represented ? Agree that it isn’t good now and likely to get worse. Tiny bit of optimism is that people will get tired of seeing clones and drones and we can create an esthetic movement around diversity. ( that’s why I prefer British TV over American, you can the humans apart, there is more diversity in human representation )

[–]drjonase 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are evil so no this will not stop. I hope it will be bait for these. But these people will always exist.

[–]Nerdler1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed.

[–]Island-Opening 0 points1 point  (6 children)

I mean, I always longing for cheap live action videos of abortion & unbirth (with smear of body horror) contents in bulk then so be it.

As of now, I got to compromise with my wallet to get such contents.

[–]BobFellatio 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What da fuck? Why …

[–]Island-Opening 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's called fetishes bruh. Yes, those are fucked up but those my favourite contents. 

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Just join a few select churches and you will get all the free content of that you could ever wish for

[–]Island-Opening 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You mean cults right? 

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I think they are all cults but there are socially acceptable cults and the “other” ones .

[–]Island-Opening 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough

[–]LibertariansAI -1 points0 points  (4 children)

Are you sure most of this woman not want to be exploited? I bet most porn workers won't be so happy about the competition. Of course there are cases of abuse, as in almost any job.

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Go look up the term exploited and get back to me

[–]Lost-Ad-8454 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Go back to church puritan

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Trust me churches corner the market on exploitation. Not being pro-exploitation does not equal antisex or even antiporn( I’m neither). If you can’t tell the difference and your knee jerk response is reflective of your inability to differentiate between sex and exploitation then You’re the problem

[–]Lost-Ad-8454 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what kind of normal job would not be exploitation ?

Thats wage slavery for you blud

[–]w00lf_T 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Long time ago, maybe 15 years ago, I saw an anime about near future, one of the episodes was about ai girl which worked in sex industry, her work looked like this: https://m.youtube.com/clip/UgkxaMr8wW0pFQQOPCWab_OMUS-dC9LkX404. Crazy to think that in some 10 years we will see the exact things imagined in media.

[–]PN4HIRE 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shit, wasn’t expecting straight up hentai in YT

[–]Falco_FFL 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Porn has always pushed tech.

Faster internet

VHS

[–]TheJix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Porn and war.

[–]FinancialCoat9422 5 points6 points  (4 children)

The vagina will have two or be located in the middle of the chest.

[–]RealBiggly 3 points4 points  (2 children)

No, we're talking about when things get better than the current stuff....

[–]throwawayPzaFm 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Speak for yourself.

That is better, in fact that's a perfect place for a vagina

[–]RealBiggly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if she's taller than me...

[–]Crashthewagon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate that that won't be a deal breaker, but a feature for some.

[–]TheDarkChef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i hope it can start today. does anyone know if its possible to get past kling's strict censor at all? its crazy how i can have gpt type up a raunchy ai prompt but kling refuses to animate it.

[–]persona0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

May I live long enough to witness the golden age

[–]The_Walking_Wallet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A couple of years!? How about next month

[–]Hapciuuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Screw porn. Whether it's AI or real people you're still using your hand. Call me when they reveal the sex robots. Then we're talking!

[–]p0lv0jack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🧠✍️

[–]lonewolfmcquaid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

porn is alreadu cuckoo, its rule 34 i'm honestly worried about

[–]Billionaeris2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RIP regular porn

[–]notloggedinreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just have to use missing parts like thumbs or extra fingers, it might even add to the experience.

[–]laurentbourrelly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Search for AI Girlfriends

[–]PN4HIRE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not o my that. The amount of lost souls that are going to be addicted to it is going to be insane

[–]DoughyInTheMiddle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VHS vs Betamax

High speed Internet in general

Blu-ray vs HD DVD

All of this has happened before.

All of this will happen again.

[–]4951cc -1 points0 points  (1 child)

My sweet summer child. It already is.

[–]Caminsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you stick with gonzo you should be fine identifying ai over real

[–]ScrapMode -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This quote goes way back since 2015 bruh

[–]Human-Lychee7322 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

its already crazy, u never heard of triple anal?

[–]AverageRedditYouser -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean VR porn? 🥰

[–]Crunch_Munch- 97 points98 points  (3 children)

Holy shit they have peach fuzz

[–]jugalator 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You know it's game over when the peach fuzz comes.

[–]GreenMirage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think I even see acne scarring. Super realistic

[–]DoughyInTheMiddle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Me, seeing the truth on the blondes chin...and then checking the thighs, zoomed in.

You know. For image quality comparison research.

[–]Kanute3333 130 points131 points  (35 children)

Wow, absolutely one of the most realistic ai images I've ever seen so far.

[–]human358 46 points47 points  (2 children)

Cleft chin syndrome

[–]the_odd_truth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Easy to amend

[–]spacekitt3n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why do all ai women have massive butt chins

[–]vladimich 16 points17 points  (12 children)

The only thing that seems off is writing on the paper. There’s weird blur around the text that doesn’t look like water damage from the marker and it can’t be explained as a compression artifact given the rest of the image is crisp and high res.

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah text is wonky

[–]ProfeshPress 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What "gives it away" is that it exhibits the same characteristic smoothing, subtle anisotropy, and tell-tale fractal self-similarity as all such images do.

Of course, the original might be another matter; and at this rate I'd anticipate perfect verisimilitude within two years, if not sooner.

[–]JohnnyDaMitch 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There is also a brief issue where the fingertip doesn't move with the rest of the finger right away. It's noticeable if you pay attention, and I was able to pause it on that spot.

[–]vladimich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m only referring to the photo. Video has multiple problems, including your example

[–]Agathodaimo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Don't forget the fact that no real human would tear so little paper off at the top and the bottom.

[–]Agathodaimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus if you close in on any big movement, the discontinuity on the hands, hair, mouth/teeth and a little bit for the blondes facial structure is very noticable

[–]TalkingMotanka 0 points1 point  (2 children)

There's another "only" thing. When the blonde turns her head back to the camera at the end, her hair bounces with her head turn, but then unnaturally bounces for no reason once she faces the camera again. It's right at the 4s mark.

[–]vladimich 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I’m replying to a comment with a photo so therefore, I’m obviously commenting on the photo, not the video. Had I been referring to the video, I would have commented under the post directly.

[–]TalkingMotanka 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you mean. He said the image was redefined, and yet the lines on the paper curve with the lettering which is a detail that was missed when trying to make just the still look perfect. I zoomed in to have a better look. The two lines on the paper just left of the R bend. The rest of the lettering in the message has an accidental effect/outline around the "ink".

<image>

[–]per08 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, right lady's earring has a nonsensical design.

[–]VadimH 5 points6 points  (15 children)

Until you notice the missing thumbs

[–]sgskyview94 58 points59 points  (10 children)

it's called 'holding a piece of paper'.

[–]DoughyInTheMiddle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the blonde is explainable, but the girl on the right, her thumb "pops" as she's pointing around.

It's still amazing, but it's the tiniest of nit-picks.

[–]peopleplanetprofit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the overly long thumb on the dark haired girl.

[–]Traditional_Card3405 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Check out the lamp on our left behind blondie. It’s a give away.

[–]Vic18t 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It can pass as some fancy mid century modern

[–]ManqobaDad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Only thing throwing me through a loop is the lamp in the background

[–]kmanej 23 points24 points  (10 children)

can you share some details how did your generate in this res? is it upscaled or raw? thanks

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 39 points40 points  (9 children)

Upscale x6 (original image 768x1024)

Ultimate SD Upscale using Flux Checkpoint with 4xFaceUpSharp model and a tile size of original heigh x width / 2 + 32 (6 tiles), denoise .35 I think

My workflow is horrible in terms of aesthetics since I'm new with ComfyUI, and I just adapted a UltimateSDUpscale I saw some weeks back with a Lora Loader and manually able to enter the height and width since it used ratio SDXL resolutions which I despise, I can share if you want.

[–]codefyre 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Wow. I don't suppose you'd be willing to post your ComfyUI workflow? I've been working on hyperrealism for a while and have gotten pretty close to this, but your image makes me realize that I still have some work to do!

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MlcW5icQBwiAyV3cTPocNuxgFt46p_Bi/view?usp=drivesdk

It's nothing special really, it's just Flux showing the power with very high upscaling , sorry about the messy workflow I'm new to comfyui. Amateur photo Lora at .8 helps with realistic people that are not fat.

It took me more than 12 minutes with RTX 4090 if I remember correctly, upscale X3 takes like 2 minutes and it still looks great.

[–]Colonel-_-Burrito 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Noob question, but why UltiSD, with original HxW/2+32? I could understand half tile size, but where does the 32 come from?

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I think it's to keep the tiles amount at a minimum while keeping some pixels overlap to keep consistency between panels, I copied from another workflow and it works great.

[–]Colonel-_-Burrito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, it's just one of those things that work well so you don't change it lol. Thanks for the answer.

[–]Acephaliax[M] 19 points20 points  (1 child)

Responded here.

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

[–]Senseo256 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You can see the fucking tiny hairs on her chin...

[–]ZombieBarney 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Jesus Breakdancing Christ! Thats crazy detail!

[–]santathe1 4 points5 points  (3 children)

The only thing that miiiight give it away is the fact that the lunulae on the finger nails of both hands of the woman on the left are different from each hand. But it’s such a minor detail. They are consistent per hand though. Impressive.

[–]Patient-Librarian-33 -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

<image>

You can see the different tiled diffusion noise pattern on the wall hehe

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Thats jpg compression artifact, it looks fine on the 26 Meg PNG but it doesn't let me share due to size

[–]StonerAndProgrammer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting that they all have a dimpled chin. You can even see flux trying to dimple the girl on the right

[–]AdOrganic5285 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be great if you made a YouTube tutorial

[–]traumfisch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just insane

[–]druhl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What upscaler?

[–]bgrated 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how was the upscale done? Thanks for responding.

[–]Standard_Bag555 0 points1 point  (0 children)

incredible

[–]FinancialCoat9422 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's funny to still be a disabled person with four fingers.

[–]illusionmist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, the iconic FLUX chin. But overall super impressive.

[–]RealBiggly 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How are you able to use a Flux image on Kling? It's not giving me the option to upload my own images, only their AI generated ones? Edit: Found it, after signing up there's no sign but if you keep hitting home you can find image to video :)

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

klingai.com/image-to-video/new

[–]RoundZookeepergame2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't wait to finesse a boomer on Facebook with this

[–]erkana_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

still sucks at human anatomy

[–]jzcreates -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wild

[–]Holy_Smokesss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It took me a long time to notice a real issue. Then I saw the right pupil.

[–]nixudos -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Truly Impressive! Can you share any tricks about your workflow to get that level of skin details? And for the upscale workflow in general?

[–]Super_Pole_Jitsu -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Why is there a line of black pixels going through the whole picture?

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happened when I converted to jpg, not present on the png

[–]mista-sparkle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One of the girl's pupils is off center lull.

[–]UUnknownFriedChicken -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The blonde girl is missing her left hand thumb

[–]DusDB -1 points0 points  (1 child)

So zooming into the text makes me guess that letters in fact are like stickers that model generates (individually/independently) and then insert into the image. Maybe that explains the great quality of text (recently) in images?... Am I right?

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not like that in other images I have generated

[–]wyhauyeung1 329 points330 points  (59 children)

when can we generate porn ?

[–]diggingbighole 370 points371 points  (1 child)

Yeah, call me when they're scissoring. It's the new turing test.

[–]ainz-sama619 14 points15 points  (0 children)

based and hornypilled

[–]OneNerdPower 43 points44 points  (7 children)

You are too late to it

[–]uSaltySniitch 13 points14 points  (3 children)

Too late ?

[–]ka1ikasan 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Too late

[–]uSaltySniitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all

[–]amazing_spyman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wheres the link then

[–]CallMePyro 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Like, there was porn but now it's gone? How are they too late? lol.

[–]RebouncedCat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When the pony guys finish finetuning

[–]Firm_Ad3037 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the real question.

[–]FinancialCoat9422 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can create it, but it's a volatile dimension porn. You should understand.

[–]rookiematerial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do it on your own, take 30 minutes to learn comfy ui and flux.

[–]AI-is-SEXY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up PonyDiffusion.

[–]Longjumping-Ad3493 101 points102 points  (11 children)

This is crazy...

[–]Private62645949 34 points35 points  (10 children)

Impressive, but as always: Check the hands. Until that’s fixed it’s still not leaps and bounds above anything else

[–]stakoverflo 36 points37 points  (2 children)

Blonde girl's teeth change quite a bit too:

https://i.imgur.com/MT4smqY.png

[–]schuylkilladelphia 52 points53 points  (0 children)

From Bethany to Methany

[–]dikkemoarte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was really taken aback by the realism but if you pay close enough attention you can see how their DNA changes in realtime by looking at their facial expressions.

It's like the Asian girl takes on several Asian subpopulation traits that are spread all over the continent.

Not to take away from how impressive it is. Just make it late 90s 144p and it would be impossible to spot lol.

[–]machstem 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The lips when she moves her head too...

[–]willun 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Also, why do they always seem to have cleft chins.

Hmm, you see it less in the video but it very clear in the still image.

The hand errors are interesting. I am guessing things like that are hard but will be solved. They are better than in the past.

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Because I added too much denoise, I have other iterations with rounder chins.

[–]Purplekeyboard 15 points16 points  (1 child)

There are still minor issues. But this is what we can do today, what will it be like in a few years?

[–]SiErRa146888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We need basically a bladerunner at some point. AI that is able to find such a small details to check if it is AI generated or not

[–]KiwiPrimal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was too busy trying to look at the legs and faces…

[–]Create_Etc 94 points95 points  (5 children)

Because it's posted here I'm seeing issues with the fingers. Otherwise I wouldn't have questioned or given this a second look.

[–]Fyren-1131 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Mouth too

[–]gmaclean 8 points9 points  (1 child)

The left girls teeth when her head is turned sideways. Goes from closed mouth to teeth appearing. At least now it looked on my phone.

[–]stakoverflo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

https://i.imgur.com/MT4smqY.png they change a lot even when she's facing head on.

First looks like she had braces for years, then she went full blown snaggletooth

[–]SevereSituationAL 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The most glaring problem if you're on a small screen or zoomed out is the leg placement and how it is shades lighter than her other leg. It could have been a Pony model that generated the image and upscaled with flux because the leg looks very ... weird.

[–]OrcOfDoom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The shorts move weird also. The leg parts don't move while the waist part moves a lot.

But yeah the fingers jump around.

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 59 points60 points  (7 children)

<image>

A funny attempt a few days ago, prompt is "girl acting shy and cute"...

[–]ButterSauce888 17 points18 points  (1 child)

ordinarily id be trying to convince myself that its real, because i think its fake...
right now im trying to convince myself its fake....because i think it looks so real

[–]The_Walking_Wallet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s over mate. Come 2026. Nothing will be real

[–]Outrageous-Laugh1363 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the prompt for the OP?

[–]LordLeopard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The lips of the dark haired girl are unnatural when they move, first thing I noticed. The hands after someone else here pointed out.

[–]pookeyblow 23 points24 points  (3 children)

Dead Internet Theory is getting realer day by day.

If we can’t label what’s AI and what’s not, the internet as we know it will become completely useless in a few years.

[–]Loose_Object_8311 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Do searches for certain NSFW terms and a non-trivial portion of the results are all just 1girl. It's really sad seeing 1girl in the search results because I can generate her if I want, I don't need to search the internet for her, she lives in my GPU, but now she's starting to crowd out the chance to see the genuine article. When I saw that I thought holy shit... dead internet theory is actually coming true and it's awful. 

I guess in a few years from now film cameras will become popular again and having a physical photo album will be treasured once again.

[–]Dvrkstvr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's already dead

[–]D3fN0tAB0t 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m already at the point where I assume absolutely every top post is manipulated to get there and they’re all ads or meant to elicit some specific emotional reaction. To be honest, I’m assuming you’re a bot too.at this point it’s just best to assume everything is fake.

[–]mrhaftbar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The blondes right hand goes bloop.

[–]MadMadsKR 45 points46 points  (9 children)

Sucks that this kind of post breaks the new rules, I would love to see this kind of content on this sub too because it gives me a good impression of how far along we are with video generation in general, and I am used to getting that kind of info from here. Just a note to the mods, it feels like an appropriate post for the sub, just my 2 cents.

Edit: Just to clarify, I only use local/open-source models and that's by far what I advocate for, but seeing what the cutting edge is like is a preview into what we'll get to play with locally eventually, so I still would like to see it here.

[–]Acephaliax[M] 55 points56 points  (6 children)

Anything that has an open source/local model in the workflow is allowed. So this does not break any rules and is allowed. You are free to post any similar content. Goal is to try and keep the focus on what’s relevant to the sub.

September 10 Update: After further community feedback and discussions within the mod team, we have revised our approach on this matter. The previous stance has now been updated to better align with the community’s evolving needs. Please review the updated rules in the sidebar and any pinned announcements for the most current posting guidelines.

[–]MadMadsKR 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Oh that's great! Thank you for the clarification, I think that makes a lot of sense.

[–]Acephaliax[M] 23 points24 points  (1 child)

Happy to help. Contrary to certain beliefs we want this space to be as awesome as it can and it is you wonderful folks that make that happen, so please feel free to check in at any time if you need any clarifications or help.

[–]gnossos_p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good Mod!

[–]imnotabot303 0 points1 point  (2 children)

This will just get abused. All you're saying is that anything is allowed as long as it's been touched by open source and AI.

Most people use Kling with a starting image so as long as people just make sure it's a SD or Flux we will continue getting Kling spam.

[–]Acephaliax[M] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

We are currently brainstorming on a way that users can still share their creations/showcases that don’t have a specific workflow or discussion attached whilst not having an influx of posts flooding the sub.

We will be keeping an eye out regardless of what the end implementation is and all other rules still apply to all posts. The aim, as mentioned, is to balance everything so we have a good mix of posts. Most of the community already want this so we are confident in a positive outcome.

[–]imnotabot303 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We'll Kling has died down a bit now but a few weeks back it was being spammed here. It will just happen again when the next new model releases. It's difficult to know what are genuine useful posts and what is just advertising and marketing.

[–]dorakus 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Try /aivideo, and there are a couple more that are dedicated to these kinds of posts.

[–]itzaar0n_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bruh her teeth changes ever time she opens her mouth 💀

[–]cookiesnooper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It lacks depth

[–]savaero 4 points5 points  (0 children)

leg number three appears is attached to the wrong person. while leg number four moves leg number three is stiff

[–]campingtroll 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This guy seems to have an advanced comfyui node that works locally with svd and cogvideox that implemented a buch of arxiv.org video research papers, so its possible to get this quality locally. Can't wait until open source catches up completely.

You can get great quality from svd and everyone even kling just rename all the layers and reorder it, train, refactor it and act like they made a new model from completely scratch.

Animatediff for instance is just heavily refactored stable_video_diffusion_pipeline.py with motion lora support and other things. Each ai video pipelines a slightly separate take on it.

[–]_BreakingGood_ 27 points28 points  (15 children)

this breaks the new subreddit rules right?

[–]tabula_rasa22 17 points18 points  (5 children)

are there any open source img2vid tools that are even close to making something like this?

doesn't change the rules, just curious.

[–]tabula_rasa22 13 points14 points  (2 children)

I went down a rabbit hole for months off and on last year trying to use img2vid within SD and A1111, with ControlNets and all that.

Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think there's anything remotely close right now. I've been keeping an eye out on tools to see if it has advanced enough.

Hate the lack in control and freedom from things like Runway, but man, nothing seems even in the same league.

[–]ExcelsiorCaps 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Are you ever planning on bringing your website / stories and captions back? Your stuff was a huge inspiration for me getting into SD.

[–]tabula_rasa22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This made my morning ☺️

I lost my hosting provider last year due to them changing ToS and canceling NSFW content, and haven't done the work migrating.

Life has been busy, and I've been putting off re-establishing since I'm a bit exhausted with being deplatformed over and over again as ToS get more restrictive over time (Reddit, Tumblr, WordPress, Twitter...)

I should re-engage but think I've been waiting to have something I thought worth sharing

[–]TearsOfChildren 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not even close.

[–]Formal_Drop526 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no, we would have to finetune cogvideox for image prompts.

[–]shmehdit 6 points7 points  (1 child)

No?

All posts must be Open-source/Local AI image generation related

Posts should be related to open-source and/or Local AI image generation only. These include Stable Diffusion and other platforms like Flux

OP's caption:

Image done with Flux, KlingAi to animate

The image was made with Flux, so the post abides.

[–]_BreakingGood_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Would like the mods to clarify, so we can post any closed source models we want, as long as we start off with an image generated via an open source model?

Eg: Can I post an image from Midjourney if I put a Flux image in as the composition or style reference image?

For what it's worth, I like seeing this kind of post, I come here to see the latest of everything AI related, but think the rules aren't clear right now.

[–]gurilagarden 1 point2 points  (1 child)

yes

[–]jib_reddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shame cus this is really cool. I bet the initial image was made with StableDiffusion and the processed in Kling, so maybe it would be ok?

[–]AndyJaeven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Had to watch this a few times. The only things I noticed that gave it away were the slightly rubbery mouths and the laggy(?) finger pointing. It looks entirely real otherwise. This is both insanely impressive and also mildly terrifying.

[–]Unhappy-Put6205 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Were kinda cooked

[–]Academic-Elephant-48 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would it look more natural if it was reversed? These movements feel backwards

[–]orchestragravy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The mouth movements give it away

[–]noncommonGoodsense 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Girl on the right lips are glitching. Def not real.

[–]pandaypira 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Watch the blonde's right fingers moved.

[–]Exciting-Mode-3546 1 point2 points  (0 children)

6 fingers on 0:03

[–]Warrior_Kid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ai going craz

[–]gnossos_p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just think. In no time this will be crude compared to the next level.

[–]_MaZ_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

[–]Fraucimor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now kiss

[–]AllahBlessRussia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hopefully this will kill off the onlyfans models fad

[–]Electronic-Net-5215 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Moat women arent honest enough to admit this about themselves.

[–]PizzaLeft1877 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is insane 🤯🤯

[–]vault_nsfw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

make it 23 fps and it will probably look more convincing.

[–]Sea-Philosophy-6911 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I see a lot of negative responses here . As long as it’s not created to harm anyone or fake a real human identity, how is this a bad thing ? I think I’m missing something.

[–]Serenafriendzone 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Because is the begging to do exactly what You said. Harm real people. And You know Is going to happen.

[–]ExoticCard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure some people will be harmed, but most won't. We could say the same thing about photoshop....

It's not easy to make this....

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what's ai's worst nightmare? hands, wrong... mouths!

im wondering how good would this be if these women didn't move their mouth & just did body gestures

[–]Lomi331 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Metheads teeth....

[–]HalfEmptyFlask 3 points4 points  (0 children)

See some weird smoothing in the movement, but if someone didn't tell me it was AI, I'd just assume there was an issue with the video compression. Gonna be scary in a few years when you won't even be able to tell. Zombie lawmakers need to wake the F up.

[–]Noeyiax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They look more real than tiktok with 50+ filters loool nice 👍

[–]ReflectionThat7354 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BRAZZERS

[–]imnotabot303 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why hasn't this post been removed, doesn't it break rule 1?

[–]praguepride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My only issue with all these is that there is never any actual movement. A slight turn of the head, blinking eyes, a few lipped words. This is easy to recreate even a year ago with simple face swap stuff.

As a tech showcase its not really showing off anything if you show a couple seconds of essentially static people.

[–]JustSayTech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Porn incoming...3...2...1...

[–]jonbristow 2 points3 points  (5 children)

What prompt did you use for animation?

[–]CrisMaldonado[S] 17 points18 points  (4 children)

Girls talking to each other and to the camera

[–]No-Scale5248 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Has kling updated their license yet to allow commercial use? 

[–]_DeanRiding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be hilarious to see an army of Chinese lawyers suing the crap out of some side hustler in Small Claims Court

[–]jdk 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Girls talking to each other and to the camera

And the piece of paper and the text came with it?

[–]londonladse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The image was created in flux , they are talking about the kling ai prompt

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]StableDiffusion-ModTeam[M] -1 points0 points locked comment (0 children)

    Your post/comment has been removed because it contains suggestive sexual acts or nudity. This is a public subreddit and there are more appropriate places for this type of content such as r/unstable_diffusion

    [–]Creepy-Muffin7181 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Is there any chance to generate longer video?

    [–]CrisMaldonado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    35 credits for every 5 seconds, normally time extensions lower quality since they use the last frame as base which is already probably pretty wonky.

    [–]JohnRiley007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Great work.

    Flux is very photorealistic and many individuals would actually believe images generated are real people.

    Yes it's still have some minor flaws and we are still not yet on the level where reality and AI are fused together...but from the brighter or darker side we are not really far from that either.

    With current speed of development we would get there in few years for sure.

    Just remember of first images that are generated by AI which hit wide open source audience,somewhere in 2022 and how bad this images were in compare to this,together with first DeepFake software that required endless hours of training to replace just one face.

    And now we come to this,only 2 years later,we have super advanced AI capable of generating crazy photorealistic images and beautiful ilustrations only bounded by pretty much your own imagination and prompt skills.

    And we have deepfake capable of replacing faces in few clicks without any training,just with one photo,so clearly rapid development and improvements in AI tech is super staggering.

    Black Forest Labs already working on realistic and powerfull open source video generator,and this is just a begining,because ever crazier stuff are on the way for sure.

    [–]Ready-Screen-6741 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Not deepfake?

    [–]Arsashti 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    The only glitch I noticed is the teleported right girl's point finger

    [–]haikusbot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    The only glitch I

    Noticed is the teleported

    Right girl's point finger

    - Arsashti

    I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully. Learn more about me.

    Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete"

    [–]WallcroftTheGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I dont know what to feel about this :D

    [–]_DeanRiding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    What was the Flux prompt / which model did you use?

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]StableDiffusion-ModTeam[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

      Your post/comment has been removed because it links to an NSFW community.

      [–]thanatica 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I'm sure two girls exist somewhere who look just like these birds.

      The fact that a face is generated, is no guarantee that nobody exists with that exact face.

      [–]xmaxrayx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Mouth looks creapy.

      [–]reddwarf_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I could definitely tell, the mouth movement was off, the teeth changed, the thumb on the lady with dark hair flicked and became two at one point. The knee on the blonde looks odd. But still very impressive.

      [–]EquipmentTall6735 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Why don't you add some music & voice over too look more realistic?

      [–]NewEmployee2404 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      stupid question - what is the current status of being able to generate this non-locally? Any decent sites offering generation of this level at the moment?

      [–]cast_iron_cookie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Ai can do shadows ?

      [–]Kaneomanie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      r34 ?

      [–]pardeike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Her (dark hair) right leg did not move at all while she was continuing to bounce with the whole body.

      [–]Next_Ad_4277 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Please master teach me 🥲

      [–]cap7ainskull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is a new era of computing

      [–]LosttheWay79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Why its always the hand that gives it away?

      I feel like a priest suddenly realizing that someone is posessed because they blinked a little weird and changed its voice for a second

      [–]BrotherAnanse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Dun-dun dun dun-dun

      [–]treebeard280 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I normally skip past this bit...

      [–]The_Walking_Wallet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Hollywood is officially on its way out

      [–]k3for 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      damn

      [–]Jumpy_Lavishness_533 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Is there a local version of kling ai?

      [–]Tsukiko_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I was trying to sign up and it told me it wouldnt take my Proton email wth lol

      [–]redxpills 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Still looked AI-ish

      [–]ChumpSucky 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      i'm gonna sound really stupid here, so this is a day that ends in -y.

      i'm trying to create an account on that page https://klingai.com/. it does some unusual bot verification where you slide a puzzle piece to its correct spot. however, the puzzle piece does not move. i do have ad blocker on firefox, my main, but i tried 5 other browsers that are unmodified, i get no interactivity. am i doing something wrong? or do we suspect that perhaps their applet is messed up on the page?

      [–]CrisMaldonado[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Don't move the piece, move the bar below

      [–]ChumpSucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      cool that worked! thanks

      [–]Friendly-Building890 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Insane

      [–]syprhdsh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Check out the motion of fingers lol 😂😂😂

      [–]ed2win44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      It's great. I had to watch it 4 times before I saw the AI imperfections of the slightly morphing mouths. Very good rendering.

      [–]Past-Exchange-141 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      How did you get access to Kling AI?

      [–]Billionaeris2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      What was the prompt?

      [–]ibraxwane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is so dangerous

      [–]queensffkid86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is insane!

      [–]juginnn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Teeth of the blonde girl looks weird

      [–]Post_Tenebras_Lux77 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Are you using the free version of fluxproart ?

      [–]CrisMaldonado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Flux Dev

      [–]Lord-Pepper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      The teeth the eyes the hands, still gives uncanny valley vibes

      [–]tabula_rasa22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Suspect this gen is going to go down as a milestone moment for img/vid gen capabilities.

      I'm certain that a year from now, we hardcore creators are going to easily spot the small tells, but

      This is right on the edge of tricking my brain even knowing the source

      [–]Im_Peppermint_Butler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      For anyone who's saying it's not there yet, go show this video to your parents. No way anyone over the age of 40 is noticing anything peculiar here.

      [–]Lolleka 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      JFC

      [–]DelightfulWahine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I am not afraid of the future. I am welcoming it.

      [–]franknitty69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This looks very good. Better than mimic. I did she the magic fingers tho 🤣

      [–]JACCO2008 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      You can see the random warping but it's under her skin and you really have to know what you're watching for.

      This is nutty.

      [–]Beast_by_Dre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Took me a few times to notice the fingers

      [–]Vonderchicken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is funny some of their facial traits are exactly the same. Like mounth and eyebrows

      [–]sydneydad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I almost refuse to believe this isn't real I can't use the teeth and finger issues others are?

      [–]crixyd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      More than good enough to confuse boomers

      [–]SamuraiX13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      the thing is, at first without looking at sub reddits name i didn't even notice its Aı cause i didn't pay much attention to details, after reading we aint real just understood whats happening, for a young programmer folk it just makes me feel like accepted defeat and accept that im probably gonna be like the older dad/moms or granny/grandpas and wont understand the amazing techs evolving

      [–]IndieAIResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Can you share your workflow?

      [–]ivchong 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      OP,

      1) Does this mean that Kling makes better videos with higher resolution images?

      2) What was your Creativity/Relavence slider value?

      3) And were you on Standard or Professional mode?

      Love your share btw =)

      Edit: found the prompt: "Girls talking to each other and to the camera"

      [–]CrisMaldonado[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      It tend makes less errors if the image is coherent so in a sense the higher the quality the better, professional mode, creativity in default settings. I used a lot of tokens and chose the one that looks best to me, but there were other interesting results and some monstrosities.

      [–]Pale_Manner3190 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      How does kling compare to other img2vid services? It seems like a new one pops up every week…

      Edit for typo.

      [–]Extension_Building34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Not sure… but does Anyone have a quick list of free or low cost img2vid tools? (I could use google but the heat google hits now are Reddit posts anyway…..)

      [–]CrisMaldonado[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      To me it mimics real people movement the best, far better than Luma which is more cinematic, I haven't tried runway. I think those are the leading 3.

      [–]Halcyon520 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      I can’t find the tell that it’s AI, I watched it like 10 times looks real to me (not saying it is, just saying it fools me) what are the stand out “This is AI” that I should be focusing on?

      [–]CrisMaldonado[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      The teeth and the fingers do weird stuff, I'm sure KlingAI can work with higher definition which would make those details far more consistent but they don't have the bandwidth to give it to users for an affordable price.

      [–]Halcyon520 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Damn I’m watching it hyper focused on those parts, it reads to me like there were slight problems uploading the video or compression issues not actual AI failure. I don’t like that I can’t tell the difference, I am not ready to abandon the internet because it can’t be trusted but here we go I guess.

      Thanks for pointing it out, but damn it, I feel like I would be fooled ☹️

      [–]enfafi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Best generated content I’ve seen so far! Impressive!

      [–]p3opl3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      It's the minor glitches on the Asian girls hand..

      But man you gotta look closely..

      Forget porn.. imagine a real conscious AI ...like an Altered Carbon... God I just wanna stay alive to experience FDVR.. I want to design my own matrix world..

      I want to give my AI girlfriend orgasms by serving her chocolate cake while being able to flip folks with absolute eloquence in French!!

      The dream(but I think I'd be better looking haha) ... https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/matrix/images/8/88/Neo_w_Mero.JPG/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/853?cb=20060831021449

      [–]Ul71 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Anytime now...

      [–]thatguyad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Mouth all over the place, people are acting kinda blind in the comments.

      [–]lesswrongsucks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Normally I'd say decades to go to get all the details sorted out.

      [–]Zeshrink -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Buddy, We’re cooked

      [–]sacredgeometry -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      What that mouth do?

      [–]arsalan63 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      which AI makes your own pics like this one for free?

      [–]qudunot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Oh man, the girl on the right gets horse mouth at the end. It's getting there though!

      [–]Ok-Strawberry3605 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Uau 🫨😖😞😓

      [–]SteazyAsDropbear -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Honestly the biggest giveaway of always the text font

      [–]armaver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      She got some dark magic in her finger.

      [–]sabalatotoololol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      I'm not upset don't be sorry

      [–]MartinDxt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      That finger flick on the right hand is the only giveaway

      [–]dallatorretdu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      the only issues is that AI learned too much from slow-mo videos

      [–]SexSlaveeee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Nice. We will use it to terminate greedy Disney.

      [–]Changingm1ndz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      The girl on the right lips sync isn't good

      [–]Klemkray -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Doesn’t only fans etc not even allow ai so most of these comments are pointless no? Or has something changed