all 174 comments
sorted by:
best
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]Light_Diffuse 107 points108 points  (3 children)

Now all you need is a plausible creation myth for why people have 12 or more fingers. GPT-3 again?

[–]therealchadius 16 points17 points  (0 children)

In future past, a radioactive magic comet forced Mankind's hands...

[–]Fake_William_Shatner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could not do worse than goat herders a few thousand years ago.

[–]delight1982 183 points184 points  (30 children)

Perfect application of SD 👍

[–]rgraves22 20 points21 points  (29 children)

My Aunt is a medium and I am going to help her put together some Tarot cards. We are going to scan in a deck and use dreambox to learn it

[–]mattsowa 18 points19 points  (27 children)

She's a what lmao

[–]bannedsodiac 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A scammer

[–]rgraves22 0 points1 point  (25 children)

A medium. Someone who is a psychic and in tune with the spiritual worlds.

She's also into reiki crystals

[–]node0 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Hey, did you hear about the psychic little person who escaped from jail?

Apparently the police tweeted that there was a small medium at large.

[–]DJTwistedPanda 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Oh, so she's a cold reader.

[–]rabaraba 2 points3 points  (2 children)

As a Japanese speaker: I laughed. Clever.

[–]theRIAA 16 points17 points  (18 children)

So she scams people and you support her. Most of these cults are only effective because of the environment they exist in. We should stop supporting people that do this and stop saying "it's okay" to be like this. It is harm, and we need to stop saying otherwise.

Although I do understand if you are not in a position to escape it. Your environment might punish you for trying.

[–]vegetablebread 0 points1 point  (9 children)

People need to calm down about this stuff. What business is it of yours if people want to pay her for her services? Do you like being free to do what you want? Good. Let other people do the same.

You don't have to agree with someone to respect them. Pretend it's a religion if that helps.

[–]Pfaeff 5 points6 points  (8 children)

What business is it of yours if people want to pay her for her services?

That's exactly how scams work. People give up their money voluntarily.

Do you like being free to do what you want?

Not if what I'm doing is against my own best interest. I'd at least would want to know that it is.

Pretend it's a religion if that helps.

Religions are a scam, too.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (7 children)

It’s not a scam. You pay for a psychic reading, you get a psychic reading. If you believe it’s real, that’s on you.

[–]d20diceman 3 points4 points  (2 children)

C'mon, really? "It's not a scam. You pay for snake oil, you get snake oil. If you believe it works, that's on you"? What is a scam, if being sold something which the seller knows is fake isn't one?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes. And it’s further complicated by the fact that the people who go to psychics believe in them, they go to get their fortune read, and that’s what they get. They’re happy living with the delusion, the world keeps turning.

Also, I hope you realize that not having any kind of belief or spirituality doesn’t make you inherently smarter or better than anyone else. A lot of people simultaneously believe and know that it’s ridiculous, but they like it anyway and it helps them anyway. You’re not some evolved mind because you don’t believe. If you need to feel smugly superior to other people, try actually accomplishing something to be proud of. I think you’ll understand as you get older.

Edit: just realized you’re a different person than the one I was replying to. Ignore the diatribe. Unless it applies in which case maybe don’t.

[–]Pfaeff 0 points1 point  (3 children)

You don't get a psychic reading, because psychics aren't real. A cold/hot reading is the best thing you would get. If you don't think it's a scam, you don't know what scams are.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

You do get a psychic reading. Just because it’s a pointless ritual doesn’t mean they don’t do it.

[–]Fake_William_Shatner -4 points-3 points  (2 children)

Well, having been around such people, and folks who are multi level marketers, I can honestly say; it could be worse. Some people NEED to believe in things that go bump in the night.

They WILL be swept up into something larger than themselves that gives their lives meaning -- so, it might as well be "mostly harmless."

Just think of it as therapy with incense or crystals.

[–]r_alex_hall 0 points1 point  (4 children)

So you make far-reaching instant negative conclusions about total strangers you learn about on the internet whom you have barely scraps of information about, and people who supposedly know them.

There are worlds of innocent possibilities your comment rules out prima facie. It is extraordinarily inappropriate and out of line for polite conversation.

But if you're not into being, well, polite, I guess that doesn't matter.

[–]theRIAA 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Can you give an example of an "innocent possibility" because I'm drawing a blank... I already excused anyone who has their curiosity punished by threat, so keep that in mind.

and thanks for editing your comment, I could tell you were heated. (you still come off as passive aggressive though don't you)

[–]r_alex_hall -1 points0 points  (2 children)

You dismissed and agressively contended against innocent possibilities expressed elsewhere in these threads.

You are not genuinely seeking learning, so I will not engage that question.

I prompted you to wake up. You’re drawing a blank where others literally started to fill it but you would not have it. You have no excuse for drawing a blank at the moment.

It’s a learning exercise for you. For me, it was to say something is really off.

[–]eminx_ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I can come to an easy conclusion based off the fact that the person being referred to claims they can talk to dead people and uses it to make money. Pretty fucking scummy thing to do.

And yes all “mediums” are scammers.

[–]r_alex_hall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy conclusions are just that.

[–]mattsowa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure she is. Lmao.

[–]LuLzWire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting use for sure.

[–]parlancex 124 points125 points  (6 children)

This looks like so much fun. What a time to be alive!!

[–]strykerx[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Lots of squeezing of papers was done while making this 😆

[–]Michaellex6 79 points80 points  (4 children)

Hold on to your papers!

[–]technogeek157 24 points25 points  (3 children)

Dr. Károly Zsolnai here!

[–]WiseSalamander00 5 points6 points  (1 child)

you know what we say! two papers down the line!!

[–]rabaraba 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hello, fellow scholars!

[–]Fake_William_Shatner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured he'd be popular around these parts. Do you think that is his actual real voice, or, he's hamming it up?

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (10 children)

This is awesome! SD and others are gonna make so many small indie projects possible.

[–]MFMageFish 58 points59 points  (7 children)

These artists thinking SD is going to take their jobs don't realize I never had enough money to hire them in the first place.

[–]Nearby_Personality55 27 points28 points  (5 children)

I *am* an artist and SD is what makes it possible for me to actually produce the projects I *want* to produce. I would've needed a whole studio to do them and it just was not possible. Basically the *only* way I could've done my art is by doing commissions full time and then it wouldn't even be the art I wanted to do.

[–]Oct2006 0 points1 point  (4 children)

How does this work? Do you train it on your style and then feed it prompts to get what you're looking for?

[–]Nearby_Personality55 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I already had a set of styles in my head I wanted to reference (because I'm working on a retrofuture piece that intentionally shows its cultural influences) and basically I'm dialing those up in Stable Diffusion then I add stuff or take stuff away until I have something that looks original, while still having its influences somewhat obvious (such as Syd Mead, Ron Cobb, Ray Harryhausen, etc).

As for my other work, I make up my own styles by just combining so much stuff and adding in so many commands into a prompt that you end up with something that's its own thing and doesn't in any way resemble any one thing that went into it. I also feed those works into Reverse Image Search on Google to make sure that it doesn't get too close to anything in style.

[–]Oct2006 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Are you still doing physical other art as well? When do you decide whether to use AI or another medium?

Edit: was presumptive to assume your other art was a physical medium

[–]Nearby_Personality55 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yes, definitely I do other art. I just kind of randomly blend digital into traditional (collaging and decoupaging) and traditional into digital (handpainted textures, drawn images, etc) and it just kind of all gets mish-mashed together. I incorporate hand-painted, found, and handmade imagery into a lot of digital work and digital work into a lot of traditional art. Now I'm feeding my images back into Stable Diffusion img2img and DALL-E outpainting and *that* is becoming a whole new trippy thing.

[–]Oct2006 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome. Thanks for entertaining the questions!

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Exactly!!! Lol, this was my first thought when I heard about SD

[–]Logical-Welcome-5638 20 points21 points  (1 child)

Very cool, well done!

[–]strykerx[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

[–]GrowCanadian 46 points47 points  (52 children)

As an artist and a computer scientists: on one hand SD will destroy a lot of jobs and destabilize industries. On the other hand it will stimulate creativity and even give creativity to people that couldn’t create before. It’s going to be interesting to see how all turns out in a few years. The art you have on your cards would have cost thousands before, now it’s free. Crazy

[–]rgraves22 8 points9 points  (7 children)

creativity to people that couldn’t create before

This is me at a T

Ive tried 3D stuff with Blender, kinda got it down but didnt have time to commit to it. I used to draw as a kid but as im close to 40 now I suck.

SD/MJ have enabled me to become an artist again and I absolutely cannot wait to see what is to come even over the next 6 months. Ive been doing this for about a month now and its advanced signicantly

[–]InfoBot4000 3 points4 points  (6 children)

I implore you to start drawing again. Everyone sucks at the beginning. Don't think that the amazing artist you use in SD started with a magical talent. They spend thousands of hours crafting their ability to draw and paint like that. That way you could create art that is truly yours.

The way I see it, you created the art, but you are not an artist. The artist is the thousend of artists SD used to learn on and the computer engineers that develop the technology to do so. You are just a user.

[–]nekocoin 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Anyone who creates art is an artist, no matter the tools they use

It can be SD, it can be Adobe, it can be oil paints, it can be pencil, and it could be a piece of chalk on the sidewalk. Heck, it could even be a camera

There's room for different types and skill levels in everything

[–]rodsn 5 points6 points  (1 child)

SD is not you creating art

[–]MongolianMango 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree. Using SD makes you a director. It does not make you an artist.

[–]InfoBot4000 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Let me rephrase myself. You say to the ai what to create, the ai creates the art, therefore the ai is the artist. It's the same as commissioning an artist.

[–]nekocoin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you've ever tried it, you know it takes a lot more than just saying what you want to get a decent result, and getting results that could compete with professional humans would take some serious studying and tweaking, img2img work, and probably some manual intervention at the end

The same can be said about photoshop - I have no art skills or knowledge and can't draw a circle, but I've used Photoshop in the past to retouch photographs and even to create basic art assets for pet games in a single day

[–]tsetdeeps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone else said, you're not the artist. You're the director.

You're writing the script of the movie. But you can't say "I directed and recorded and edited and acted in the movie". No, you just wrote the script. Sure, it's important and you did participate in the making of the movie and it wouldn't have been possible without you, but 90%+ of the work was done by someone else (or something, in this case).

I see many people wanting to own the credit for how good the AI art is, but we aren't making the art. The AI is.

If you wanted to do it without the AI it'd take you years of training and practice and even then maybe you wouldn't reach the results you're getting with SD. So it's pretty clear it is not us making the art, it's the AI. We're just prompting it.

[–]alexdelargesse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm sure they said the same thing when the camera was invented and variations there of as it got cheaper and more sophisticated.

It will change things that's what technology does.

If it allows more people to express themselves creatively I'm all for it.

[–]SPACECHALK_64 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

All of those people with destroyed jobs and destabilized industries might be able to get a new job as a curator to help sift through the endless sludge that the democratization of tools likes this helps create haha.

[–]435f43f534 7 points8 points  (1 child)

do you references for card games? like rulesets, etc... i'd love to put SD and my programming to work for a digital one 🤪

[–]strykerx[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I actually was creating this as a digital game, but wanted to do a physical prototype to test it out and iron out rules and balancing issues. I was going to use unity to dev. If you would like to team up, I'd welcome that. I am not the strongest developer.

[–]LifeLiterate 8 points9 points  (8 children)

When cellphones started having decent cameras, many photographers worried that it would endanger their industry. It didn't. But what it did do was remove a financial barrier that allowed people who couldn't normally afford to hire a professional photographer or buy a DSLR camera to create photographs they used to not be able to create. The photography industry is still thriving.

When graphic design apps started popping up on phones, many graphic designers worried that it would endanger their industry. It didn't. But what it did do was remove a financial barrier that allowed people who couldn't normally afford to hire a graphic designer or buy Adobe CC to create designs they used to not be able to create. The graphic design industry is still thriving.

Stable Diffusion has arrived and many artists are worried it will endanger their industry. It won't. But what it is doing is removing a financial barrier that is allowing people who couldn't normally afford to hire an artist to create art they used to not be able to create. The art industry will continue to thrive.

I love your use of SD, OP! They look great.

[–]SelloutRealBig 2 points3 points  (6 children)

It didn't.

The obscene amount of people who think shitty distorted phone pics with a smudged lenses look better than professionally shot photos would like a word with you. Smartphones definitely did impact the photo world in general, just not at the utmost professional level.

[–]LifeLiterate 2 points3 points  (5 children)

I'm a professional photographer, by trade. While I agree with you that there are a ton of people who think their cellphone photos are "good enough", that hasn't stopped or even slowed down my career, and the hundreds of photographers just in my area alone, who are all doing fine. The pandemic? That's a different story. But cellphone pics have not stopped most of us from earning our living creating photographs professionally.

[–]Eruditass 0 points1 point  (3 children)

These advances don't negatively effect the top N% of people in that trade. The bottom percentage will have a much harder time and likely have to move onto something else. But yes, the top percentage will be fine, or often benefit from it, e.g. as discussed by top illustrators here

The photo industry was very different back in 2008. Same with painting when photography came along, and many other industries. The best will adopt, differentiate, and thrive— the rest will not. But the field will be better for it.

[–]ElDoRado1239 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Yes, but do we really NEED the average photographers / artists? Now they are forced to either study and improve to become the "needed" top N% or move to something else. I don't think we need average Xdoers who will never move beyond average in doing X. If this forces them to be creative, maybe they'll invent Y for which there won't be a "stable diffusion" for a while. Keeps things going. Eternally average is a curse, I think.

[–]Eruditass 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I think I made my position pretty clear and it appears you agree with me?

The best will adopt, differentiate, and thrive— the rest will not. But the field will be better for it.

It doesn't change the fact that it will shrink and potentially negatively impact the field for a large portion.

[–]ElDoRado1239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've kinda skipped the last bit, sorry. In that case yes, I agree. Many people will complain and it will indeed affect their livelyhoods, but most customers or contractors would stumble upon their work only by sheer chance, because they don't stand out in any way and their work could be perfectly replaced by any other artist of similar level.

[–]TracerBulletX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of these things put negative price pressure on these markets. It used to be a lot easier to make a living at some of these jobs.

[–]TrainGear 7 points8 points  (0 children)

wow. that's a good way to take advantage of it.

[–]Magnesus 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Looks superb. I am working on a similar project but got stuck a bit. :) Looking at your nice cards makes me want to go back to working in it immediately.

[–]strykerx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I started prototyping with just writing on cards...but making prettier cards definitely invigorated my desire to keep going cuz it gave me a look at what the finished product could be like.

[–]GoodAndBluts 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is brilliant - well done, OP

[–]daveberzack 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I did too. Of course, this isn't really enabling prototyping. You can prototype with hand-written text.

You have a whole suite of final graphics, which would have cost many thousands of dollars just a couple months ago.

[–]rocketchef 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is so cool. Exactly the kind of creative empowerment this tech was made for.

[–]jinkside 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"The CattleGod"

[–]Gfx4Lyf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man!! That's awesome. SD is a magical gift to humanity:-)

[–]AramaicDesigns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm doing this exact same thing right now (for the art). :-)

[–]acki02 4 points5 points  (3 children)

How did u generate the names and stuff?

[–]FridgeBaron 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Fantasy name generators can pump out a whole bunch of random names. There are also others, one for DnD can make entire character ideas so that would also be super useful.

[–]acki02 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The problem I have with them is that you have no control over what you get.

[–]FridgeBaron 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I just spam generate stuff, take what I like and change anything to suit what I want.

Depending on what they want with the DnD generator you have a general look, what kind of abilities the card should have and random extra details to write flavor text. If that's not enough I dunno what is.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (9 children)

Am I the only one or what, but there is a distinct feel to an image of characters that are generated with SD. Are artgem and greg rutkowski to blame?

After a week or so of seeing SD creations and characters I became nauseated by them.
They all have the same vibe and look too Stable Diffusion-y, there's nothing wow or original about them. Just look at Lexica website, it's all the same.

There's a lot of improvement to be done on how people use SD and different styles that they should try besides all these plasticky looking lady portraits.

[–]Pretend-Marsupial258 13 points14 points  (3 children)

It's because people are copying the prompts that worked, so they're copying the same artists/keywords over and over again. You would see a lot more variation if people would try to make other styles, like Cubism, Art Deco, etc.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know that's why it's happening, but it's becoming quite saturated and boring pretty fast. But I guess it's a good thing and soon people will start taking the opportunity to experiment with different styles and stand out with their creations.

[–]Nearby_Personality55 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's because people are copying the prompts that worked, so they're copying the same artists/keywords over and over again. You would see a lot more variation if people would try to make other styles, like Cubism, Art Deco, etc.

All of this, most people just aren't that original, lol. AI is "garbage in, garbage out." If someone wants to create a truly unique and interesting style, they can.

[–]gingertheparrot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this. Lately I’ve been including Arthur Rackham and Joaquín Sorolla together in prompts and getting pretty distinct results

[–]Gibgezr 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, it's everybody using Artgerm/Rutkowski/trending on Artstation, and all making pretty pictures of pretty women.
I did some wonderful lithographs of Ent-wizards last night by Escher, Edouard Manet, Patrick Woodroffe....they look absolutely nothing like that.

[–]DeQuosaek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You just haven't seen the right generations. Lots of people just copy other's prompts and don't spend hours and hours experimenting to come up with something other than "by artgerm, 8k, super-duper-detailed, sick, by Greg Rutkowski, trending on artstation, Octane render, Unreal Engine 17".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, a lot of people are obsessively fixated on the copy+paste “trending on artstation, by Greg Rutkowski” prompt and it produces stuff that not only all looks the same, but also IMO is mostly really awful and generic “art”

There are infinite worlds inside SD. You can type literally anything into the prompt — a passage from Paradise lost, a stream of consciousness, a poem, completely abstract phrases. You can conjure utterly bizarre alien dreamscapes, labyrinthine mega cities on forbidden Dreadworlds; you can add anachronisms and dramatic juxtapositions by simply having a thought and typing it out — now you have a Daguerrotype of a pastoral landscape with a nuclear mushroom cloud on the horizon.

This is just crap I typed off the dome. Imagine it in the hands of a real artist with talent, dedication, and time. The people typing “Digital illustration of fantasy elf woman, tits, crystal staff, by Greg Rutkowski, trending on artstation” are going to be left in the dust

I do like how OP used it tho

[–]SelloutRealBig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI art just steals bits and pieces of already existing art but lacks the direction of human input. It's why it often looks great in texture or detail but off as a whole. If it does manage to make a great composition than odds are it stole a bit too much from existing artists.

[–]MrLunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

^ This

[–]Abdan_Cuevas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome! I'm doing the same, for landscapes and certain items, in my game there are not humans per se, but anthropomorphic stuffed characters, and after almost 100 iterations, didn't get any one that I genuinely liked, so I give up on that

[–]traumfisch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow 👌🏻

[–]SergeantHindsight 1 point2 points  (2 children)

There are a lot of frontend GUI desktop and web apps for StableDiffusion. Are there any for GPT-Neo and other AI text generators?

[–]ManamiVixen 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Yes... it's called KoboldAI.

[–]SergeantHindsight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, Thank you

[–]cryptolipto 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Everyone is all worried about AI taking away opportunities and I look at stuff like this and I only see creative potential being unlocked.

[–]strykerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's how I feel. I graduated university in graphic design. But I see SD as a blessing, not a curse. It opens up the world to so much more. There are plenty of people that may have had good ideas, but didn't have the tools or time to learn how to manifest it. But AI like SD democratizes creativity.

[–]BearStorms -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Yes, I think this is extremely exciting. I wonder how soon we will see the impact on expensive projects like movies and games. Probably quite soon as this will give a studio an incredible leg up.

[–]cryptolipto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The image to 3D thing is gonna be huge for indie games. Imagine being able to make a whole city just from images!

I can’t wait to see where this goes in 5 years

[–]BloodyKitskune 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is the type of stuff that I'm so excited about with algorithms like stable diffusion. I see all these people talking about how it takes away from artists. But like, not everybody is an artist or wants to be one. This allows people to create in so many different ways without needing to focus their energy on those aspects of their projects if that's not what interests them.

[–]Supersubie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now everyone has the power of a full creative agency in their pocket.

The creativity this will actually unlock is mental.

So many artists have dream projects they would love to work on but it takes them years and years of effort to produce. And because they have to pay the bills they never manage to make them.

Suddenly if you can do it with a few months of work... well. The chances of some truly original IPs being made just went right up.

[–]ManamiVixen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lookin' good!

[–]TiredTimeLord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love this. I have an idea for a game I've been working on and hadn't even considered this. Bravo

[–]DueBenefit7735 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is super amazing!

[–]amarandagasi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think SD is fantastic for brainstorming and prototyping. So often, we have ideas in our head, and it’s nice to be able to explore, and get them out. And, sure, technology always disrupts markets, but when you’re just starting out, you really don’t have a budget to pay for an artist. But this card deck could go straight out as a prototype and, if someone likes it, -they- could hire an artist to make corporate-appropriate art, and keep the underlying system. Of course, I also think Real Artists (I hate to use that term) are going to use AI as a tool, too. We see it here all the time. Generate something close to what you want, then tweak it manually. It opens up so many doors for people. Democratizes art!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did the same thing to remake a simple card game that had some card missing or damaged.

[–]butterdrinker 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Did you create each card manually?

I wanted to do something similiar by I didn't want to edit each card with its image, but maybe have something like a json file where I can simply define the card text + which image its attach to it.

There is already https://crobi.github.io/rpg-cards/generator/generate.html which does something similiar, but it has a very limited potential to edit the card template or even change its font size

Also I didn't want to brush out my Javascript skills do it myself

[–]strykerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used Adobe InDesign+ a csv file. So I created the card template and the csv file had all the info of name, power, ability, images, etc.

There are probably free softwares that will do a similar thing.

[–]Zachary-360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s amazing

[–]EliotStocks 0 points1 point  (1 child)

u/strykerx how many images did you have make for each one before you got something that you were happy with?

[–]strykerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the god images, I probably generated 100-200 images each. I would do small batches as I tweaked the look I wanted, then would do a large batch of like 70-100 and then sifted through those to find good ones. And sometimes I would find a good one but then do some img2img to refine it.

For the actual cards, I was less picky on images, as I'll probably change them later. I used the wildcard script in the automatic1111 repo and created some variables, then just let it run for like 200-300 images. Then I just went through and picked out the ones I liked that would roughly fit with the card.

But when I go to finalize it, I'm gonna be renaming lots of the cards and then probably doing some workflow similar to what I did with the god cards to get final artwork.

[–]Imaginary-Unit-3267 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is epic. But the guy on the dinosaur is holding the spear backwards. At least if he's about to throw it to his right as he appears to be.

[–]strykerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha ya, that one was probably the one I had the hardest time to get right...and this was the best I could do without doing some manual Photoshoping or indepth inpainting. SD doesn't like dinosaurs...and doesn't like spears.

[–]JackieChan1050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing work !

[–]DreamHomeDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Dream

[–]sirleavemyhouse 0 points1 point  (1 child)

are... are those... avatar saucers??

[–]strykerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they are. Got them on Etsy

[–]eminx_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Making a card game with GPT 3 and stable diffusion feels so soulless, at least use just one or the other.