×
all 40 comments

[–]evil_seedling 52 points53 points  (2 children)

I'm amazed at how accurate claude is given full context and documentation. It really is a great indexing and discovery tool.

[–]Single_Blueberry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe a lot of people underestimate how powerful these tools are, because they evaluate them based on the results to their terrible prompts that lack most of the necessary context.

[–]claythearc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I have my cars user manual in Claude as a project and it’s super handy despite being like 99% knowledge

[–]AmnesiacKidd 33 points34 points  (0 children)

This is a scenario where human + AI shines. If Enterprise hadn't dropped this and you had to pursue this legally, you're just a few prompts away from starting the process

[–]Glad_Supermarket_450 24 points25 points  (3 children)

I built usecontractly.com for this very reason EXCEPT I was accusing my ex employer of breaching contract.

3 days, led by Claude, and they paid me in full. They wanted to do a video call so that they could nail down terms etc.

Claude said nah, keep it all in the email. He cited Texas business law & 3 clauses in their contract.

Got paid out $2600 & didn't do any of the work myself.

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Stuff like this makes me shocked that LLMs aren't being used more widely. We're still so early.

I'm curious about anything special you did with Claude during your dispute. Any tips or tricks in how you prompted it in order for it to be a legal expert?

[–]ExtremeOccident 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Easy, most people just throw a random question into ChatGPT, get an unsatisfactory reply, dismiss all AIs as crap, and move on.

[–]Glad_Supermarket_450 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Super early.

Well I turned a project into a contract analysis agent, then did the same thing on my app.

I also built a RAG system for state laws as well, so it's not just contracts but it compares it to whatever state it's in as well.

[–]VitruvianVan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That should cover Pro for some time.

[–]kilroy7072 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A few months ago, I embarked on a retail adventure that turned into an odyssey of frustration. I made a splurge-worthy purchase from a big-name retailer—let’s call them BB. I used a well-known online payment service—let’s call them PP. Everything seemed golden: payment? Done. Expedited shipping? Oh yeah. Extended coverage? You bet. I was basking in the glow of a successful transaction.

Then, a curveball. Hours later, I get an email from BB with the dreaded subject line: “Action Required: Payment Not Authorized.” Uh, excuse me? BB was demanding a new payment method, claiming my original one didn’t go through. Naturally, I reached out to PP, who assured me the payment was successful and kindly reminded me that, oh yeah, I’d still be on the hook for the charge. Cool. Cool, cool, cool.

Quick side rant: Have you ever tried to speak to an actual human at these companies? It’s like hunting for Bigfoot while blindfolded. Honestly, it’s easier to find the one mythical hotel shower setting that’s not either arctic frost or scalding lava.

What followed was four days of sheer agony: emails, web forms, text messages, and phone calls that went nowhere. I was caught in a loop of unhelpful bots and scripted replies. Finally, I decided to unleash my secret weapon: Claude. I uploaded every piece of documentation I could find into a new project, poured out my tortured tale in excruciating detail, and got to work refining prompts.

The result? A miracle. Within three hours, Claude whipped up a resolution that left me shaking my head in disbelief. All that drama, undone in less time than it takes to binge half a season of my favorite show. Honestly, it was a masterclass in AI saving the day—and my sanity.

And as if you don't know this already, this post was rewritten by AI (except for this last line).

[–]jrf_1973 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If he saved you 10 grand, you can afford to pay top tier for the year.

[–]Dalai-Lama-of-Reno 11 points12 points  (3 children)

I’ve rented from Enterprise for a long time. Lately they have been SLIPPING. 

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They've completely lost my business after this fiasco. If I didn't have support from my uni, I'm not sure I would have won

[–]Pro-editor-1105 4 points5 points  (0 children)

enterprise is garbage. Once I went to a dealership to get my car serviced and they gave an enterprise slip for a car. They wanted to give us a 20 year old Ram 1500 with like (I am not kidding here) 1000 scratches in the bed. We said no, then they told us we were on some nonsense no rent list, waited THREE HOURS, and then they gave us a Chrysler 300c which was very clearly smoked in, had over 100k miles, from 2015, and the display claimed the speed limit in the area was 106 miles an hour lol. Safe to say I am not using enterprise again.

[–]florinandrei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lately they have been SLIPPING. 

You mean - they're creating lotsa value for them big kahuna shareholders.

[–]Victor_UnNettoyeur[🍰] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

I'm curious if you had Claude polish this post for you too?

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Let me hear your opinion first - what is your probability guess of this being mostly written by Claude?

[–]Jisamaniac 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hold on let me ask ChatGPT.

[–]WimmoX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I felt zero AI-triggers reading your text. Either you’re great at writing texts or AI text generation is on such a level that it makes reading long(er) post feel like a breeze.

*bias disclosure: i super love Claude, but that’s why I’m in this sub lol

[–]Victor_UnNettoyeur[🍰] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

~80% that Claude reworked your notes into a polished post. If Claude wasn't involved in any way, even to polish the text, then you put more effort into the punctuation of your post than 95% of redditors.

[–]GrumpyCoo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Of course there’s no compensation for mental anguish and for the time you had to spend getting all of the material together.

[–]PewPewDiie 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I'm fighting a 30k usd insurance claim rn with claude in first instance. I have good hopes that the response, largely written by "him", will hit first instance without me having to escalate to legal.

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hoping for the best for you! Can you give some details about your case? Maybe I can help

[–]Junis777 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did it go?

[–]datasert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting application of Claude and sure AI would shine as it can crunch lot of text, extract important bits and use that to build a response.

Would you be able to post redacted dispute response from Claude?

[–]girlplayvoice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why I much prefer Claude. It’s so so much better when it comes to detailed work.

[–]SoUpInYa 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I'm interested how you fed all of this info in, and what prompts you used

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I started a new project and gave background details on the situation. The artifacts I added were: the rental agreement, my school's site page talking about the rental partnership, all docs sent to me from Enterprise, and PDFs of all email threads I had with Enterprise and my school's Risk Management contact.

Then I just talked to it and asked for advice on drafting emails and looking into legal routes

[–]amifrankenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain what you documented

[–]Funny_Ad_3472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude is just the best

[–]Development_8129 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bravo Claude!!

[–]VoteNO2Socialism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$10k into $20

[–]Smishh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude + Me's winning streak against my HOA is -3-0 4th case is in adjudication.

[–]ShadowHunter -1 points0 points  (3 children)

In this case, Enterprise was in the right. There is a personal travel code that you should have used. Ask your travel person if you can't find it. By using the business code you implied to them that this is a business trip.  They just didn't want to bother fighting.

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I did *not* use a business code. I specifically used the "personal/leisure" code. I acted in good faith the whole time

[–]ShadowHunter 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Sorry, I just have missed that in your post.

[–]SnoringLorax[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

np, looking back it's not so clear in my post, so I just made an edit