all 29 comments

[–]AnOnlineHandle 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is incredible for all sorts of prompting, revealing a lot about how to figure out prompts when direct english fails (e.g. your solution to makeup colours)

[–]plushtoys_everywhere 10 points11 points  (3 children)

Great post, thank you so much.

I was experimenting trying to find a way to make the subject "taking off" the cloth. - Add half wearing to the cloth seems to work, ironically, half of the time. - Add half nude in the front helps with that too.

If anyone has any success prompts for taking off clothes, or removing clothes please share.

[–]anonyyyymuser[S] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Any dynamic pose will be brutal. Nobody takes off their clothing the same way. So it will always be a weak phrase.

I'd advise building a pose in Photoshop and then maintaining it in Img2img rounds with either masks or by telling SD about it: "hand on shirt pose" (from my own testing, neither "gripping" nor "holding" work)

[–]1MoonBoi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do you make SD not mangle your poses in im2img or inpainting? I pose figures in Blender, then tried inverse inpaiting (to preserve hands/feet), and I frequently get mangled people, or ghost hands (I kept your hand in the picture, but as a fuck you, it's just there and I redrew the whole arm and another hand somewhere else!).

[–]jwb1969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've found adding "candid" in the prompt like "Dynamic candid action pose" does sometimes offer some enticing results!

[–]Tulired 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Thanks for this post. Will be overall useful too, like another poster commented👍

[–]faketitslovr3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this was very good.

[–]MNKPlayer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Amazing work.

[–]Sure-Tomorrow-487 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Gonewild" produces naked, but unattractive, people

Lmao

[–]collectsuselessstuff 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Amazing post! Which model did you test this on?

[–]anonyyyymuser[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Probably what you'd expect: CompVis

[–]collectsuselessstuff 0 points1 point  (3 children)

CompVis

I meant more like SD 1.4 or SD 1.5 or some of the other models out there like waifu diffusion or F222.

[–]anonyyyymuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in the post :)

These are words that have a verified impact in SD 1.5 and k-euler – for every keyword in this, I rendered a Txt2img prompt across the same 8 incrementing seeds at 512x512, 16 steps, and a CFG of 7.5, and compared the difference to the original prompt

[–]ilikemrrogers 0 points1 point  (1 child)

f222 is out now??

[–]collectsuselessstuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy Halloween!

[–]AIPoweredPhilistine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry question, so the "cherubic" tag for face shape, is it "cherubic face" or just "cherubic"?

[–]manzomo 0 points1 point  (4 children)

That's great for a noob like be. What do you suggest to get a short hair cut? Thanks!

[–]anonyyyymuser[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I haven't tested any :)

Off the top of my head, some unique-seeming terms might be "bob" "choppy bob" "asymmetric bob" "buzzcut" "skinfade" "undercut" "androgynous haircut"

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Gerodi 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      How does it work with more cartoon/anime characters? My guess is that it's the same as long as it has "enough" of SD 1.4/1.5 in it?

      [–]anonyyyymuser[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      All of the clothing stuff should work perfectly. The rest...? No clue.

      [–]Gerodi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      OK, that's another thing to test in this crazy magical sandbox :)

      [–]taircn 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      I can only give you a props for the amount of nightmare like pictures that you had to withness and delete. And especially for the amazing ones that were broken by unnesessary limb or head out of nowhere. Those are hard to delete, almost feel as murder crime.

      [–]anonyyyymuser[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Truthfully, when you're only adding a single word (like I did with almost all of these) to a prompt, it rarely gets too bad. Most words are just nonsense to SD and it results in an unchanged, or vaguely different photo.

      Honorable mention to "beestung lips", which works but also renders bees, and "skeletal" for high cheekbones, which also works... but, yes, turns people into skeletons.

      [–]dontnormally 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      wow!

      [–]aurabender76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      First off, huge kudos for taking the time and effort to put this together and then actually sharing it with the community. Bravo! I have tried a few of these tricks, mainly in the lighting area, and received the result just as described.
      You mention doing poses in PS. Is that your go to? If so, would you share the process a bit. I have quite a bit of PS experience but have had little luck getting a drawing that even remotely performed well in Img-img.

      [–]Equivalent_Mix_3829 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Have you tried the prompt 'massive'? For me it seems to work pretty well on anything. And thanks a lot for the post!!

      [–]jwb1969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Thank goodness you discovered the SD breasts "flaw" that every man wants D cups! LOL!

      I tried everything, too, except for mosquito bites! LMAO! It almost seems they are trying to bait us into an age bracket, start at 20 and work down to say 16, and you'll see what I mean. Screw that. I'm not messing with 16 although legal in some southern states.

      Regardless, I'll guess we will just have to stick with the C cups. or the Embeddings of small-chested women, e.g. Gal Gadot,

      [–]Able-Usual-3844 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      negative promt: big size breast

      makes small breasts

      [–]Sneaky_Anonymouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is an exhaustive list!