I tried for 1h, with Google, stackoverflow etc. Finally asked gpt4. It's insane.

Sep 5, 2023 · 5:50 PM UTC

Replying to @francoisfleuret
I find GPT4 to be super useful at such tasks that can be very well specified and rather narrow. Treat it like a sidekick. Still makes mistakes and can be tedious but overall tends to be much faster than working on your own.
Replying to @francoisfleuret
Life is good
Replying to @francoisfleuret
I built latextai.com to make it possible to do this directly inside Overleaf - you can edit your LaTeX and GPT-4 has context of your document! So it makes this kind of use-case even more powerful.
Replying to @francoisfleuret
I paste performance critical methods I write into ChatGPT and ask it “can you do this more efficiently?” Normally it can. I love it. The advantage of doing this is that the whole hallucination thing is avoided. Unlike Copilot which often writes garbage.
Replying to @francoisfleuret
It's like if you had a tool box with a bunch of stuff in, but no crescent wrenches. You could certainly do some everything without them. But having a tool that does some stuff perfectly, is just amazing
Replying to @francoisfleuret
gpt4 is very very good at latex stuff lol
Replying to @francoisfleuret
When you know what needs to be done and can be specific GPT4 can save so many hours of struggle it's baffling
Replying to @francoisfleuret
It's very very bad at Mathematica, though. Would be a great project for Wolfram to pound out, a plugin or llama2 fine-tuning for their DSL.
Replying to @francoisfleuret
One of the best things about asking chatGPT code questions is that you can ask if it is sure about a step and it will refine and often refactor it.