Tweet activity

Last 28 Days

Your Tweets earned 155.0K impressions over this 28 day period

10.0K20.0K11May 14May 21May 28Jun 4
Your Tweets
During this 28 day period, you earned 5.6K impressions per day.
  • Impressions
    Engagements
    Engagement rate
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 Now, you can use precognition to fake arbitrary retrocognition. But can you use retrocognition to fake arbitrary precognition? I'm still thinking. You can do a lot if you invoke Laplacian Demon-level powers of prediction based on retrocognitive knowledge, but that's a big ask.
      1,844
      22
      1.2%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 Thus, Sabine has shown that while precognition & retrocognition may logically coexist, epistemically, they don't: you can only prove 'precognition NAND retrocognition'. This definitely comes as a surprise to me and I don't think I've ever seen that claimed before.
      3,055
      42
      1.4%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 So, the retrocog dilemma: if some 'fact' about the past is reported by retrocognition, and it cannot be publicly verified, then obviously it's no proof; but if the fact ever is verified, then the 'retrocog' could just be a precog snooping on the future verification & no proof.
      2,053
      19
      0.9%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 Sabine makes a weaker argument above, appealing to subconscious knowledge, but you can of course strengthen it to any knowable 'verification' itself: if someone ever publicly discovered the meaning of a hieroglyphic, the precog steals it from the discover's *mind or publication*.
      1,320
      8
      0.6%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 What's really fascinating to me here is that Sabine succeeds in his goal of giving a fully general Kripkesteinian skeptical argument against retrocognition: any fact reported by retrocognition then verified could symmetrically just be *pre*cognition foreseeing the *verification*!
      981
      26
      2.7%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 On a nominative determinism sidenote: the important details that they were lesbians & prone to hallucinations come from the salacious expose _The Ghosts of Versailles_, written by "Lucille Iremonger", which I was *sure* was a pseudonym until I checked.
      1,156
      12
      1.0%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 7 Actually, it's more than a self-fulfilling prophecy, presumably it was a stable time-loop: their vision ensured their research, & their research ensured their vision, with it being initially set up by an exogenous & apparently common fascination of lesbians with Marie Antoinette.
      1,958
      16
      0.8%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 6 The value of fresh eyes/anon feedback: they asked why there was a big modal for the enable/disable popups toggle, when there was a theme bar with icon-options for everything else. 'Er... Good question.' There were reasons, but they hadn't been valid for easily a year. Fixed.
      3,975
      45
      1.1%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern Jun 5 Big CSS/JS rewrite to refactor & try to prevent bugs. On the lorems, Said says it cuts >5s off rendering time. Certainly does feel faster, although Google Pagespeed is convinced everything is slower. 😕 Now we find out the hard way about edge cases & bugs in the new version...
      2,541
      32
      1.3%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern May 30 Caught COVID for a third time. ☹️ Observations: - Dramamine worked wonderfully. (Ginger gum felt redundant.) What I thought was the intrinsic misery of air travel was actually low-grade nausea... Who else?🤔 - Project Fi worked well in UK - Cash increasingly discouraged there
      3,226
      104
      3.2%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern May 21 Regrettably, all the Oxford stuff (like Ashmolean) today is right out due to a flat tire & missing the flight. Oh well.
      6,272
      49
      0.8%
      View Tweet activity
    • 𝔊𝔴𝔢𝔯𝔫 @gwern May 19 I'll be in London/Oxford next week: possibly Oxford Sunday afternoon (then Mon/Tue), but definitely Wed in London & a bit of Thursday morning. Suggestions?
      13,001
      310
      2.4%
      View Tweet activity
You've reached the end of Tweets for the selected date range. Change date selection to view more.
Engagements
Showing 28 days with daily frequency
Engagement rate
3.2%
Jun 10
3.8% engagement rate
Link clicks
772
Jun 10
18 link clicks
On average, you earned 28 link clicks per day
Retweets without comments
1
Jun 10
0 Retweets without comments
On average, you earned 0 Retweets without comments per day
Likes
1.0K
Jun 10
25 likes
On average, you earned 36 likes per day
Replies
144
Jun 10
3 replies
On average, you earned 5 replies per day