Silk Road forums

Market => Product requests => Topic started by: xrhyno on January 05, 2013, 02:28 am

Title: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: xrhyno on January 05, 2013, 02:28 am
Im waiting on a order to come in from dutch and now im doudting it ever will, is there any other bulk molly dealers besides SuperTrips, ive heard his product is not the best, I loved dutch and his prices, Im lookin for half oz and oz listings however, is anyone out there?!?!?!
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: tor12345 on January 05, 2013, 03:48 am
search "luckylucianno" on the main site. he has the best molly.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: soo25 on January 05, 2013, 12:26 pm
same boat..were u guys at.BULK BULK
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: xrhyno on January 08, 2013, 09:46 am
might wait on more feedback from lucky, all seems to be well but i might just wait, jesusofrave made some bulk listing but its just for a preorder
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: m0rpheu5 on January 08, 2013, 05:31 pm
Look up FartBomber's Discount Shop : http://silkroadvb5piz3r.onion/silkroad/user/50d8611d8e

cheapest molly on the road, small 10g listings. No customer support though.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: iceman8989 on January 08, 2013, 05:36 pm
i can get u this and cheap u can call me jack of all trades ha. if u want to know more inbox me. thanks
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: m0rpheu5 on January 08, 2013, 06:05 pm
i can get u this and cheap u can call me jack of all trades ha. if u want to know more inbox me. thanks

You sound quite like a nigerian scammer. GTFO!
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: iceman8989 on January 08, 2013, 06:49 pm
i am not a scammer at all just dont have the money right now to be come a vendor but i have alot of products.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: Barbijuana on January 08, 2013, 07:25 pm
i am not a scammer at all just dont have the money right now to be come a vendor but i have alot of products.

Sell those products and buy a vendor account?

The audacity.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: quinone on January 08, 2013, 07:37 pm
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

There are many vendors with much more superior MDMA and there's a thread about it/

And btw pure MDMA is 100% NOT FUCKING 84% !!!!  The molecule is MDMA.HCl   the 16% from HCl is STILL PART OF THE MOLECULE JEEZ.  So i'd question any vendor selling 'pure' 84% MDMA.

I can dig up the link in the MDMA thread where I explained the entire chemistry, but the 84 thing is a load of ... what brits would call, bollocks.

Learn how to quantify ppl,

Oh to add i've heard that MMM and Symbiosis have some of, if not the best MDMA on SR at the moment.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: jnemonic on January 08, 2013, 10:37 pm
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

There are many vendors with much more superior MDMA and there's a thread about it/

And btw pure MDMA is 100% NOT FUCKING 84% !!!!  The molecule is MDMA.HCl   the 16% from HCl is STILL PART OF THE MOLECULE JEEZ.  So i'd question any vendor selling 'pure' 84% MDMA.

I can dig up the link in the MDMA thread where I explained the entire chemistry, but the 84 thing is a load of ... what brits would call, bollocks.

Learn how to quantify ppl,

Oh to add i've heard that MMM and Symbiosis have some of, if not the best MDMA on SR at the moment.

Well said quin, its annoying reading 84% when its really 100%. ;)
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: snark on January 08, 2013, 10:54 pm
Check out the last few pages of the Dutch review thread. He is open about the fact that his packing guys sent orders to old addresses, I think ones placed at the end of November as well as the beginning of December. He has been great about it though, refunding people 100 percent and telling the people who got free stuff merry christmas.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: xrhyno on January 09, 2013, 04:43 am
yeah im tryin to get ahold of dutch, my order accidently finalized early cuz i forgot to extend the date and it auto finalized aafter 17 days so im tryna work something out, i kno i could be fucked but hopefully dutch makes it right ;) and i cant order from fartbomber, cuz im inside the usa ;(
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: FartBomber on January 09, 2013, 05:25 pm
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

Where did you hear that? I hear nothing but greatness about it from my customers. Its tested at 79% so not 84% like almost every other vendor on SR claims lol. In any case, when you read this, message me on SR with your address and I will ship you half a gram for free if you promise to review it :D
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: XTC_EXPRESS on January 10, 2013, 03:47 am
Nobody cared to mention my account!? :p
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: Oil Wrestling on January 10, 2013, 03:55 am
^ Definitely XTCEXPRESS is great!  We've also got some USA domestically shipped MDMA as well (costs a bit more than the foreign, but we can get it to you in about 2 days!)

--
OW
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: XTC_EXPRESS on January 10, 2013, 04:08 am
^ Definitely XTCEXPRESS is great!  We've also got some USA domestically shipped MDMA as well (costs a bit more than the foreign, but we can get it to you in about 2 days!)

--
OW

Thanks! We're offering 300 skulls for $4 a pill if there's enough interest, a 3 day special only.
Waiting to see if enough interest in PM's come in.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: quinone on January 10, 2013, 05:23 am
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

Where did you hear that? I hear nothing but greatness about it from my customers. Its tested at 79% so not 84% like almost every other vendor on SR claims lol. In any case, when you read this, message me on SR with your address and I will ship you half a gram for free if you promise to review it :D

So by 79% you mean you have no clue, because 84% is not pure MDMA.Hcl.  100% is pure MDMA.HCl,  You do not measure the purity on the number of MDMA moieties, you measure it on the number of molecules, which happen to be a salt,  in pretty much any form that's ever been sold by just part of the molecule.  You measure it based on the entire  molecule, and HCl is part of the molecule, you don't just ignore that 16%.

Explained in full on the MDMA thread, but this 84% thing is crap garbage misunderstanding.  The MDMA salt you want to roll on is just that, a salt, you don't just ignore the HCl because it's not part of MDMAs structure, it's still part of the damned molecule.

And to answer, I heard from several people that they were not very satisfied with your product.  It's also in the MDMA review thread where there are several posts saying your MDMA was not very good quality.  I have no way to comment on it's purity because you don't know what it is yourself.  84% MDMA.HCl would be garbage, so vendors gotta stop advertising the wrong chemical parameter of purity and recognize that HCl is part of an MDMA molecule which come as salt's for ... all the obvious reasons you'd want it as a salt form.  Explains too why DXM is Dextromorphan HYDROBROMIDE, they don't just 'add' HBr" for shit and fun, and it is part of the DXM molecule that was synthesized.  You don't pick and choose what parts of a molecule are what you ascertain the yield on.

That is incorrect chemistry and more importantly incorrect declarations to all of MDMA's buyer's interest in the purity of the MDMA listing they are looking at.  If you don't know what it mean's, don't write it in your description.  Especially if what you've written is just straight up WRONG.

Anyways yes, several reports that yours is weak and impure, some that i've heard myself (I was looking tor MDMA bout a weed ago so was given some PMs') as well as in the MDMA review thread itself.  If i'm not mistaken, I don't recall one single post saying your MDMA was good compared to several of the other vendor;s.

If you  have some new batch that's purer, that's great, but report it's yield please, nothing less then 98% should be acceptable of the MDMA salt users are buying, and if you produced it yourself and adhere to this 84% nonsense then user's should actually be concerned, because you don't even know the basic chemistry of what analytical yield/purity is, and I for one don't want a chemist synthesizing my compound who ascertain's it's purity only on the cation.  Just because it's a molecule bound by an ionic bond doesn't make it any less of a molecule with an anionic moiety (HCl).  Sorry to say, but the 16% HCl contributes is part of what the yield is as you are counting the number of MDMA.HCl molecules compared to any other impurity.  Few would want a non-salt form of MDMA either, for many reasons I just won't get into.   Moral though is that the MDMA pills, crystal, powder that you consume IS A SALT, sorry if that hurt's your psyche, it just is how it is (besides, it yields a highly +ve charged cation of MDMA which will cross the BBB a lot easier, so you want the salt anyways).

Dude and those who followed him asked who had the most quality MDMA, and yours simply is not as good as MMMs or Symbiosis's, so sorry bud but you'll just have to deal with it and/or manufacture >99% MDMA.HCl, and lose the 84% failed chemistry declaration that some clearly non-chemist started and managed to get enough people believing it that they actually advertise their product as having such a low yield.  Just because dissolution into cationic MDMA+ and anionic Cl- yields 84% CATIONIC MDMA, which is NOT MDMA, just as the MDMA salt we are all after is not MDMA, it's a salt of MDMA (which we ARE after) does not change the fact that the molecule you're after and whose yield you are calculating is MDMA.HCl,.  You see ... dissolution is a chemical event where you are making a change to the product, particularly into a charged cation which doesn't exist when not ionically complexed with it's conjugate base (HCl).  Tell me how much MDMA.HCl there is please because this is how you calculate yield, you dont pick and choose parts of a molecule/macromolecule.

Once a vendor starts telling me the actual yield of the MDMA salt we are all consuming I will gladly give their product a shot, and ascertain qualitatively for myself if it is >98% or whatever they declare it as is right.  84% MDMA is absolute shit qualitty though, Shulgin would be shaking his head at all of you riht now if it weren't for his poor health :( and that he has more important things to do.

I'm gonna keep saying it even in the middle of a different statement too, until enough people bother to actually learn what the information they are asking for.

MMM and Symbiosis are two of the 4 or 5 vendor's who people have been claiming to have the best MDMA.HCl.  I don't take tab's so I don't know who the besst MDMA.HCL tab vendors are, which is why I only named MMM and symbiosis, both of which deserve to have their names said cuz they have quality product (though I think MMM still adheres to this 84% non-sense).  Luckily when i'm actually rolling I don't care about the stupidity of other's esp. if they synthed it themselves and then don't know what yield is lol.   The wonder's of rolling though eh :)
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: AnonymousAddict on January 10, 2013, 05:31 am
THERE IS A OFFER FOR A FREE MOLLY SAMPLES UNDER 'PRODUCT OFFERS'!!!    http://silkroadvb5piz3r.onion/silkroad/item/ed067e1ef2
FREE SHIPPING AND ALL///
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: FartBomber on January 10, 2013, 11:15 am
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

Where did you hear that? I hear nothing but greatness about it from my customers. Its tested at 79% so not 84% like almost every other vendor on SR claims lol. In any case, when you read this, message me on SR with your address and I will ship you half a gram for free if you promise to review it :D

..wall of text...

The 79% is what I got back from the testcenter. I hear the Dutch testcenters only report back the amount of MDMA even if you give them the MDMA with Hcl attached. Thanks for the big explanation though, im sure many people will find that knowledge very handy! Also the offer of a free sample still stands :D Also, if you calculate 100 - (0,79 * 16) = 87.36% purity MDMA.Hcl.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: morphinate on January 10, 2013, 06:46 pm
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

Where did you hear that? I hear nothing but greatness about it from my customers. Its tested at 79% so not 84% like almost every other vendor on SR claims lol. In any case, when you read this, message me on SR with your address and I will ship you half a gram for free if you promise to review it :D

So by 79% you mean you have no clue, because 84% is not pure MDMA.Hcl.  100% is pure MDMA.HCl,  You do not measure the purity on the number of MDMA moieties, you measure it on the number of molecules, which happen to be a salt,  in pretty much any form that's ever been sold by just part of the molecule.  You measure it based on the entire  molecule, and HCl is part of the molecule, you don't just ignore that 16%.

Explained in full on the MDMA thread, but this 84% thing is crap garbage misunderstanding.  The MDMA salt you want to roll on is just that, a salt, you don't just ignore the HCl because it's not part of MDMAs structure, it's still part of the damned molecule.

And to answer, I heard from several people that they were not very satisfied with your product.  It's also in the MDMA review thread where there are several posts saying your MDMA was not very good quality.  I have no way to comment on it's purity because you don't know what it is yourself.  84% MDMA.HCl would be garbage, so vendors gotta stop advertising the wrong chemical parameter of purity and recognize that HCl is part of an MDMA molecule which come as salt's for ... all the obvious reasons you'd want it as a salt form.  Explains too why DXM is Dextromorphan HYDROBROMIDE, they don't just 'add' HBr" for shit and fun, and it is part of the DXM molecule that was synthesized.  You don't pick and choose what parts of a molecule are what you ascertain the yield on.

That is incorrect chemistry and more importantly incorrect declarations to all of MDMA's buyer's interest in the purity of the MDMA listing they are looking at.  If you don't know what it mean's, don't write it in your description.  Especially if what you've written is just straight up WRONG.

Anyways yes, several reports that yours is weak and impure, some that i've heard myself (I was looking tor MDMA bout a weed ago so was given some PMs') as well as in the MDMA review thread itself.  If i'm not mistaken, I don't recall one single post saying your MDMA was good compared to several of the other vendor;s.

If you  have some new batch that's purer, that's great, but report it's yield please, nothing less then 98% should be acceptable of the MDMA salt users are buying, and if you produced it yourself and adhere to this 84% nonsense then user's should actually be concerned, because you don't even know the basic chemistry of what analytical yield/purity is, and I for one don't want a chemist synthesizing my compound who ascertain's it's purity only on the cation.  Just because it's a molecule bound by an ionic bond doesn't make it any less of a molecule with an anionic moiety (HCl).  Sorry to say, but the 16% HCl contributes is part of what the yield is as you are counting the number of MDMA.HCl molecules compared to any other impurity.  Few would want a non-salt form of MDMA either, for many reasons I just won't get into.   Moral though is that the MDMA pills, crystal, powder that you consume IS A SALT, sorry if that hurt's your psyche, it just is how it is (besides, it yields a highly +ve charged cation of MDMA which will cross the BBB a lot easier, so you want the salt anyways).

Dude and those who followed him asked who had the most quality MDMA, and yours simply is not as good as MMMs or Symbiosis's, so sorry bud but you'll just have to deal with it and/or manufacture >99% MDMA.HCl, and lose the 84% failed chemistry declaration that some clearly non-chemist started and managed to get enough people believing it that they actually advertise their product as having such a low yield.  Just because dissolution into cationic MDMA+ and anionic Cl- yields 84% CATIONIC MDMA, which is NOT MDMA, just as the MDMA salt we are all after is not MDMA, it's a salt of MDMA (which we ARE after) does not change the fact that the molecule you're after and whose yield you are calculating is MDMA.HCl,.  You see ... dissolution is a chemical event where you are making a change to the product, particularly into a charged cation which doesn't exist when not ionically complexed with it's conjugate base (HCl).  Tell me how much MDMA.HCl there is please because this is how you calculate yield, you dont pick and choose parts of a molecule/macromolecule.

Once a vendor starts telling me the actual yield of the MDMA salt we are all consuming I will gladly give their product a shot, and ascertain qualitatively for myself if it is >98% or whatever they declare it as is right.  84% MDMA is absolute shit qualitty though, Shulgin would be shaking his head at all of you riht now if it weren't for his poor health :( and that he has more important things to do.

I'm gonna keep saying it even in the middle of a different statement too, until enough people bother to actually learn what the information they are asking for.

MMM and Symbiosis are two of the 4 or 5 vendor's who people have been claiming to have the best MDMA.HCl.  I don't take tab's so I don't know who the besst MDMA.HCL tab vendors are, which is why I only named MMM and symbiosis, both of which deserve to have their names said cuz they have quality product (though I think MMM still adheres to this 84% non-sense).  Luckily when i'm actually rolling I don't care about the stupidity of other's esp. if they synthed it themselves and then don't know what yield is lol.   The wonder's of rolling though eh :)

Seeing someone saying this made me happy. Thanks :)
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: quinone on January 10, 2013, 10:39 pm
I've heard Farbombers stuff is subpar at best.

Where did you hear that? I hear nothing but greatness about it from my customers. Its tested at 79% so not 84% like almost every other vendor on SR claims lol. In any case, when you read this, message me on SR with your address and I will ship you half a gram for free if you promise to review it :D

..wall of text...

The 79% is what I got back from the testcenter. I hear the Dutch testcenters only report back the amount of MDMA even if you give them the MDMA with Hcl attached. Thanks for the big explanation though, im sure many people will find that knowledge very handy! Also the offer of a free sample still stands :D Also, if you calculate 100 - (0,79 * 16) = 87.36% purity MDMA.Hcl.

No, the dutch test center gave you the yield of aqueous MDMA salt, and i'm certain if you knew how to read their report the yield of 79% they gave you is the yield of MDMA+ cations you sent them.  MDMA doesn't exist as a charged cation, it will quickly form a bond with an anion as one would expect.  They reported correctly, you just read the wrong molecule that they reported (they reported MDMA+ to you).  Well me and anyone who knows better want's to know how much MDMA.HCl there is, and I highly doubt you walked in there and asked them to tell you the purity of the MDMA salt in your sample .. because you clearly don't even know it is a salt.  So they did what any lab would do when asked how much XXX is there, they will tell you how much XXX, even if it's a non-stable cation.  They are expecting that you want to know how much MDMA+ there is for your EXPERIMENTS (unless you found an analytical lab that freely quantifies Schedule I drugs ??) in which they would just presume you are using MDMA+, doing some experiment let's say conjugating it with other conjugate bases .. you know, LEGAL study.  If you'd gone in and asked them to quantify how much MDMA HCl salt is in your solution then you'd have gotten back a number in the 90's, but see MDMA.HCL is an illegal stable Schedule I compound.  MDMA+ is an INTERMEDIATE molecule, arguably even a TRANSIENT species cuz it's so heavy and will rape any molecule it can to find an anion to bind to.  I just don't think you understand me enough lol, and i mean no offense, but im trying here to keep this simple.  If you think this post was long then go to the MDMA review thread where I did the math and explained it in fuller detail.

This is NOT a hate campaign against you Fartbomber, I hope you understand that.  It's an attempt to clarify, but if you want to call it a hate campaign one targetted to every single vendor writing that their yield is at or around 84%, you just happen to be one of them.  Every vendor should remove this 84% claim, it's wrong and its just propagating and convincing others that dont know any better that it's right.  If you know the purity of the MDMA salt you're selling then hell yes you should put it in your listing.

You can't really do what you did 100 - (0.79  * 0.16) = 87.36% because the 79% yield they gave you is still on the MDMA+ they flowed through their HPLC column ... in other words 79% is a wrong number anyways.  But it is a valiant effort lol, and I will give you this, yes it is a good means of giving someone a ROUGH estimate of it's yield, but in your favour, your MDMA.HCl is probably above 90%, it just comes down to the method of quantification, and im certain if your claiming 84% that they were measuring charged particle yield, and thus used HPLC as their means of quantification.  It's typical to use GC/MS on non-charged solutions because the GC part separates the molecules, the MS part identifies them.  HPLC is a great method of quantifying charged particles, but it's accuracy isn't quite up to that of a method that separates each molecule individually BEFORE quantifying it.  Can't imagine what electrospreaying a cation would do lol, but it sure would do the opposite of what the electrospraying step does is designed to do and yer gonna have bizarrely electron bound transient moieties traveling down that tube (even in quadrapole MS) hitting the metal plate to which an EM field is applied at .. random positions.  It'd probabaly yield a spectrum that is just 100% saturation ... anyways enough that pointless chat, you guys aren't chemists so don't likely want to talk chemistry hah.

Also, you deserve a bit more kindness then i've likely given you.  So I want to say that I was stating the HIGHEST QUALITY vendors in my list.  You are not to be ignored and your product is GREAT quality as long as it hasn't had adulterant's added, which i'm assuming you havn't (same is true of every MDMA vendor, if there are no adulterants added to specifically cut it, it's a light year's better then any MDMA you'll find on the street).  So for your price your product might be the correct choice of many buyer's and I am telling those buyers they should not hesitate to buy from you.  Even if you did quantify wrong it still tells enough about it's purity to tell that it is of a high caliber, (way more then what's on the streets), and as long as it wasn't cut, hell for the price i'd consider buying from you myself ... but i'd only want the best of the best. 

Pay the price tthough, MMM wants $350 for 10g, that's hugely expensive and you'll likely roll just as hard off of your stuff.

I appreciate your offer for a sample, but no thanks i'll pass.  Not cuz i'm worried, just cuz  firstly this isn't an elaborate attempt to get free samples lol, but second I just don't want anything in the mail right now.
Title: Re: Wheres the molly at?!?!?!?!?!!?!?
Post by: FartBomber on January 11, 2013, 03:12 pm
No, the dutch test center gave you the yield of aqueous MDMA salt, and i'm certain if you knew how to read their report the yield of 79% they gave you is the yield of MDMA+ cations you sent them.  MDMA doesn't exist as a charged cation, it will quickly form a bond with an anion as one would expect.

Ive got to be honest, I know a lot about drugs but not as much as you it seems. I will read up about all the terms you use because I want to understand :)

They reported correctly, you just read the wrong molecule that they reported (they reported MDMA+ to you).  Well me and anyone who knows better want's to know how much MDMA.HCl there is, and I highly doubt you walked in there and asked them to tell you the purity of the MDMA salt in your sample .. because you clearly don't even know it is a salt.

I know MDMA in rocks is a salt. Youve got the freebase liquid which you bubble muriatic acid trough to form the HCl rocks. Also, I walked in there with a baggy of MDMA, and asked them to test it for purity :P

So they did what any lab would do when asked how much XXX is there, they will tell you how much XXX, even if it's a non-stable cation.  They are expecting that you want to know how much MDMA+ there is for your EXPERIMENTS (unless you found an analytical lab that freely quantifies Schedule I drugs ??)

Yes, we have those labs here in the Netherlands, one of the few good things our politicians havent taken away yet.

in which they would just presume you are using MDMA+, doing some experiment let's say conjugating it with other conjugate bases .. you know, LEGAL study.  If you'd gone in and asked them to quantify how much MDMA HCl salt is in your solution then you'd have gotten back a number in the 90's, but see MDMA.HCL is an illegal stable Schedule I compound.  MDMA+ is an INTERMEDIATE molecule, arguably even a TRANSIENT species cuz it's so heavy and will rape any molecule it can to find an anion to bind to.  I just don't think you understand me enough lol, and i mean no offense, but im trying here to keep this simple.  If you think this post was long then go to the MDMA review thread where I did the math and explained it in fuller detail.

Im not sure how/what the labs tested. I called them and got back the number 79% without any further explanation. In other threads I have read that they only test for MDMA and not MDMA.HCl. Maybe that was wrong info. Ill read your post in the MDMA review thread to educate myself a bit more on the subject.

This is NOT a hate campaign against you Fartbomber, I hope you understand that.  It's an attempt to clarify, but if you want to call it a hate campaign one targetted to every single vendor writing that their yield is at or around 84%, you just happen to be one of them.  Every vendor should remove this 84% claim, it's wrong and its just propagating and convincing others that dont know any better that it's right.  If you know the purity of the MDMA salt you're selling then hell yes you should put it in your listing.

I know youre not on a hate campaign against me mate, I really didnt take your posts like that. You do look a bit like youre bragging with your drug knowledge though, but I guess it cant hurt to let people know the exact ins and outs of  MDMA chemistry and percentages which are indeed flying around everywhere.

You can't really do what you did 100 - (0.79  * 0.16) = 87.36% because the 79% yield they gave you is still on the MDMA+ they flowed through their HPLC column ... in other words 79% is a wrong number anyways. But it is a valiant effort lol, and I will give you this, yes it is a good means of giving someone a ROUGH estimate of it's yield, but in your favour, your MDMA.HCl is probably above 90%, it just comes down to the method of quantification, and im certain if your claiming 84% that they were measuring charged particle yield, and thus used HPLC as their means of quantification.  It's typical to use GC/MS on non-charged solutions because the GC part separates the molecules, the MS part identifies them.  HPLC is a great method of quantifying charged particles, but it's accuracy isn't quite up to that of a method that separates each molecule individually BEFORE quantifying it.  Can't imagine what electrospreaying a cation would do lol, but it sure would do the opposite of what the electrospraying step does is designed to do and yer gonna have bizarrely electron bound transient moieties traveling down that tube (even in quadrapole MS) hitting the metal plate to which an EM field is applied at .. random positions.  It'd probabaly yield a spectrum that is just 100% saturation ... anyways enough that pointless chat, you guys aren't chemists so don't likely want to talk chemistry hah.

So basically the 79% number they gave me is pointless because you cannot know the purity of the sample I gave them of that?

Also, you deserve a bit more kindness then i've likely given you.  So I want to say that I was stating the HIGHEST QUALITY vendors in my list.  You are not to be ignored and your product is GREAT quality as long as it hasn't had adulterant's added, which i'm assuming you havn't (same is true of every MDMA vendor, if there are no adulterants added to specifically cut it, it's a light year's better then any MDMA you'll find on the street).  So for your price your product might be the correct choice of many buyer's and I am telling those buyers they should not hesitate to buy from you.  Even if you did quantify wrong it still tells enough about it's purity to tell that it is of a high caliber, (way more then what's on the streets), and as long as it wasn't cut, hell for the price i'd consider buying from you myself ... but i'd only want the best of the best. 

Pay the price tthough, MMM wants $350 for 10g, that's hugely expensive and you'll likely roll just as hard off of your stuff.

I appreciate your offer for a sample, but no thanks i'll pass.  Not cuz i'm worried, just cuz  firstly this isn't an elaborate attempt to get free samples lol, but second I just don't want anything in the mail right now.

Thanks :) And the free sample wasnt offered with anything else in mind then that I like to have reviews of it on the SR forums from obviously knowledgeable people people like you. Have a good weekend!