Silk Road forums

Discussion => Newbie discussion => Topic started by: poob on February 03, 2013, 07:25 pm

Title: Digital Scales
Post by: poob on February 03, 2013, 07:25 pm
Hi!
Was just curious, and I suppose this question is posed more at consumers, would you guys use a digital scales for measuring your dosage?

We've ordered some DMT and Changa. From reading the reviews in threads on here there seems to be a massive difference in trip with the slightest of incremental differences. My partner and I have done LSD plenty of times but wouldn't like to go hard initially with the DMT.

If so could anyone recommend a decent, budget scales that would be accurate for dosages in the milligram range?
Cheers!
Title: Re: Digital Scales
Post by: pudpacc on February 03, 2013, 07:28 pm
i have an aws scale i love
Title: Re: Digital Scales
Post by: poob on February 03, 2013, 07:31 pm
Sweet. Affordable too. Thanks :)
Title: Re: Digital Scales
Post by: BugsBeBoss on February 03, 2013, 07:52 pm
Yes. AWS, Gemini Pro imo.
Title: Re: Digital Scales
Post by: FugNuggetz on February 03, 2013, 08:39 pm
AWS GPR-20 is a good entry level milligram resolution scale. It has a SD of about +/- 3 mg which is OK for my uses. IMO if you are going to buy one of these scales then you need to just go ahead and get a calibration weight kit. The one I got was only like 10-15 dollars and comes with tweezers as well as every type of weight under the sun (1mg, 10mg, 20mg, 200mg, 500mg) all the way up to 50g. Getting a good scale is useless if you don't have a reference to test its accuracy. Remember that changes in environmental conditions (pressure, temperature, air flow) can cause huge changes in a scale's reading. If you moved your scale, you most likely need to recalibrate it.
Title: Re: Digital Scales
Post by: poob on February 03, 2013, 09:32 pm
Great thanks a lot for the feedback. I'll pick up the -20 and the calibration kit. Together they come in at about 60 bucks, which although a little dearer,  probably conforms to that old adage; buy cheap, buy twice.  Much appreciated