gg
So mods don't update the Marketplace list but instead remove everything from warnings including the shilling post that had "factual information"
gg
[6 Points] None:
[4 Points] J603:
That's really weird that they got rid of every single warning. If a site gets a warning, shouldn't it be there forever? People should be warned if sites make an Opsec mistake or are shady. Even if the dnm admins fix the security issue the impression shouldn't be given that they can be fully trusted.
[4 Points] MLP_is_my_OPSEC:
No matter what the mods do, it seems like they can't please anyone. Let's see if I can bring some light to the issue.
The Market Warnings
were a controversial issue to begin with. They were supposed to be warnings, but everyone took the list as an avoid at all costs type deal. It was there to help buyers/vendors make an informed decision on what market they do their deals on. People complained about certain markets being on there, saying mods were "shills". I highly doubt that's the case, the current team is incredibly (mostly) professional. If a mod was found out to be a shill you can be sure that it would cause a shit storm here and you would not miss it.
Instead of making shitposts like this, how about provide some constructive criticism? Or even post on your regular account and not be such a coward posting from a throwaway?
[3 Points] Jackaroopz32:
gg
[3 Points] -lobali:
A. Shilling isn't really a terribly enough crime to warrant a warning.
However, /u/MLP_is_my_Opsec joined the mod team today. This is a project he will be working on. Continue to post suggestions politely and helpfully please as these are huge issues to be handled be a small mod team and require community input to be done responsibly.
We want community feedback but being human, we happen to also not enjoy being told what incompetent twats we are. Let's start working together again.
This sub worked great when it was tiny because everyone supported one another. It can be even greater at the current size once we all start remembering we are still in the same team.
[2 Points] casecod:
Everyone was complaining that there were warnings for unnecessary reasons. Like Nucleus' admin dox. I don't see why they removed all of them though
[2 Points] None:
[deleted]
[1 Points] J0NJ0NES:
Relax bro. The mods here are not trustable period. You shouldn't trust anyone for that matter. This is how it is until something better comes along.
They've been busted for shilling in the past, so it can't be a surprise that their 'lists' don't make sense. If one of the mods doesn't like you as a vendor or market (or they get paid by someone), then you can expect to make it on one of those 'lists'.
I've made suggestions about how they could improve how they add to those 'lists' so as to lend themselves more credibility, but after some nonsensical responses they just ignored the issue. Kinda says a lot. You'd think trying to improve their credibility would be of high priority.
[0 Points] BrodhiRoundhouseKick:
Go make your own subreddit that conforms to reddit general TOS.
[0 Points] Theeconomist1:
LOL. Interesting that the only warning you mention specifically was the one regarding Absolem. But I'll act as if you were actually wondering, for the good of the community, why this list would change. Have you considered that perhaps we decided to improve the infomration contained in the market list and to ensure that the proper context gets conveyed to the sub to better aid them in their decisions as to which market to use? That maybe we felt the list needed to be revisted for not only content but also the process under which a market gets added.
Or maybe its b/c we were so concerned about removing Absolem and in order to hide it, we had to remove ALL the markets because NOBODY would ever notice that. /sarcasm of course. Because really that's what you are saying right? You don't care about the market list. You care about a particular market being on that list.
[-2 Points] BrodhiRoundhouseKick:
Doesnt gg = good game. This isnt a game.
[deleted]