Can we start a fund to get US/Euro vendors coke Energy Control tested?

I would like to see Euro/USA vendors coke tested by Energy Control. Kind of like the guy that got a lot of Australian vendors coke tested by EC. https://www.reddit.com/r/DarkNetMarkets/comments/3tqtl2/australian_vendor_energy_control_lab_results_nov/

Does anyone else want to do this? Instead of the same people taking chances on the same vendors we can all get assigned/volunteer for different vendors, send it off and get it EC tested. This way we are all guaranteed to only have to take one hit instead of several in an attempt to find the best coke on the DNM.

I would say we would need to choose about 10-20 vendors that majority of people want to get tested either because they are suspicious or they want to prove the a vendors coke is really good. Reviews and testaments only go so far nowadays.

Not sure what is the best way to go about this. Open to ideas? Maybe the mods can set something up or maybe guide me a direction to set something up. If there was a public wallet it would never need to exceed $300. Once there's $300 in the wallet we would all vote on a vendor to purchase from. Preferably not in public view where a certain vendor will know and then send out higher quality product than normal. This would cover an average of $100/g = $100 for testing + shipping costs = <$300. The $300 mark would prevent a mod or whoever is on control of the wallet from stealing it. If it was stolen we would know who stole it and then ban them or take whatever action is necessary. Once the $300 is spent we would start adding to it again. Just an idea to start with... open to more ideas.

Edit 1: I do NOT think the person in control should be me as I have terrible Opsec and do not frequently purchase from the DNM. Only the occasional coke/hard to find drugs which I have be burned on too many times.


Comments


[7 Points] None:

[deleted]


[1 Points] BurbankJoe:

they do that in /r/dnmavengers


[1 Points] Ethereality_DNM:

Sorry to hear that you think our forums are shitty /u/SlappySpanBank. If you have any suggestions for improvement, we'd love to hear them.

We actually do offer the exact service you're looking for. We have had over 18 BTC donated to us from various generous members of the community, and we use that donation money to reimburse people for Energy Control tests. You can read all about it in our forums.

If it's been a while since you visited our forums, maybe you can check them out again. Today (yesterday technically), as a matter of fact, we were featured on the front page of Deepdotweb and DNStats, so while we're still very new, we're growing at a great pace. I truly enjoy chatting with members of our community and I think we have a great thing going.


[1 Points] None:

What happened to Guru/Elmo /CokeheadSR? They had a testing going on the Nuc forums. Lots of people were being tested there.


[1 Points] Theeconomist1:

Just a note - mods can't get involved in this. We are working thru guidelines and one is that mods won't be involved in anything that involves handling coin or even how coin is spent. We can't have a repeat of what happened.


[1 Points] Theeconomist1:

My advice is to not have only one person handling and watching the funds. Uou need multiple people who all watch each other. If one person holds the keys to the wallet, another needs to do the accounting function and watch the coin. Don't let balances build up like you said. Can multisig be used in this sort of capacity? Let balances be in a multisig account where 3 diff people hold the keys. Things will go wrong if you aren't watching.


[1 Points] None:

How do you make sure the vendors don't just fluff the tests?

edit: just saw you address this rectum,