[OPSEC/Computer] Did Anyone see that "Deezletime" kept Addresses for Every Single Order?

Did anyone catch the fact that "Deezletime", the busted heroin vendor from SR1 who is now testifying against Ross, kept every single address from every one of the over 2400 orders he processed? That's right: Every. Single. Address. For the love of fuck: WHY? I suppose that's a good sign for buyers, seeing as we would have heard about a massive dragnet for thousands of Deezletime buyers, if the cops decided to chase down those leads.

Anyway, that information is contained about 3/4 down in this artice.


Comments


[6 Points] RosyPalm:

For the love of fuck: WHY?

There is an endless supply of vendors/admins that insist on making LE's job as easy as fucking possible.

The fantasy is that turning over their ledger book to LE will buy their freedom.

The reality is that LE uses the ledger to confirm the sales they know about, and find out about all the sales they didn't know about.

LE's interest in a vendors buyers ends the moment they pick up the vendor.


[2 Points] ciphersexual:

I'm more shocked to learn that Deezletime was copping 40 bricks of stamps at a time "on the street." That sounds mad risky and unreliable to me. Any North Jersey folks know that scene?


[1 Points] friendofstranger:

For the record, it wasn't 2400 addresses, but ~24 addresses 100 times each

Edit: just to clarify that I wasn't defending deezletime. Just pointing to the nature of heroin usage, and many repeat purchases by a smaller group of individuals


[1 Points] Incabowithablondeho:

errr well lets say I may be on that list. pretty sure I ordered a small amount from deezle in september 2013 one time. Since then I've had 10+ delivers with no hangups, am I in the clear?


[1 Points] young_k:

Can they actually prove that is a legitimate list, I mean i guesss referencing the SR1 site that imaged, etc, but as far as confirming what those people all got was ALL drugs of XXX nature, and filing charges....

that shits all long gone by now...so what would it actually be if someone was to get arrested now, this long later, when they werent vendors and shit with a paper trail on site of selling.


[1 Points] RobotTits:

Why? For the same reason people have to be constantly reminded to shut the fuck up and never talk to the police....

They think their situation is different. The detective on their case is different. "Nah, man. My detective said he'd help me out. He was cool about it. He even bought me a soda!!"


[1 Points] sweeterthanpoppy:

When I was looking up vendors today, I saw several that keep addresses. Look up WALLSTREETx2. Total asshole with excellent feedback on Agora but keeps a customer list. His profile states that he is only open to established customers and if you aren't on it, he takes your $. One person had ordered from him in the past but he told them that he was keeping the $ as a "lesson" for attempting to order. It's just stupid for the vendors to keep addresses because it further implicates them.


[1 Points] yepawesomepants:

I'm more concerned that a list like this will be made public by being entered into evidence in a trial. Then some shady website buying it and putting it online for people to search. They do this now with those ads you see with mugshots.

I can see something like: "Find out which of your neighbors buys illegal drugs online!"

It might also end up in some kind of background search database.

Look up some of the privacy talks by Steve Rambam (a PI who uses these databases) if you don't belive that this kind of data collection happens.


[0 Points] dogdogdogpoop:

You should expect that most vendors keep addresses.

If I was a vendor, I would keep addresses. I would need to know who are scammers and who are not.


[-1 Points] SecondChanceUsername:

Why would a vendor even think that, that would be valuable in LE's eyes? Any lawyer can beat that case just by the fact that anybody can send anything to any address they want. That is a fundamental of DNM that allows it to exist.