Hello,
So i know that people on here generally agree you lose plausible deniability for the most part if you have a pack shipped to your PO box since that PO address is something you would have to provide.
However, in the case of someone like a YouTuber who has a PO box that they make public to their audience where they receive packages of all kinds with all kinds of content, wouldn't they still have plausible deniability because their PO box was readily available to a community of users who all have the ability to ship drugs to that address? Thus, they could have these packs delivered and maintain their innocence if the OPSEC was shitty.
Say what? I must be reading you wrong ot something. Could be extreme tiredness from lack of sleep, but it sounds like your saying your losing plausible deniability using po box by having to give the vendor your address to ship the drugs to. What am I missed here, because uhh, obviosuly you have to provide an address to hvae your pack sent to. How else would it make it to you? What does a PO Box or not a po box have anything to do with anything,,And how does getting mail at a PO Box mean you personally authorized and initialized the sending of all mail to that PO your self. You always have to provide an address to have an orde shipped to. I fail to see your reasoning. Please explain what you man.
You have plausible deniability as longa s they cant tie you to that pack in any way. Cant prove you ordered it or had it sent there. Cant prove you had prexisting knowledge of it or its pending arrival. etc..This is why you dont track packages from your home IP, but they could use that to show you knew about the pack