Sourcery's Trustless buying process explained.

Here is the wiki entry explaining our buying process.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SourceryMarket/wiki/buyers/buying#wiki_purchasing

Sourcery's buying process has at most, one or two more steps than any other market but it provides a safe transaction and removes the need to trust any market. Other markets claim to have "security escrow" or other such non-existent gimmicks, Sourcery is the only market that never touches you coin and never will. Other "multisig" markets require you to send them the coin first! Rendering the multisig useless to protect your deposit!

Years ago when i first started out on the darknet, I was taught to assume every market was compromised and conduct business in a trust-less way. This is the standard we need to return to.

Sourcery is the only market where you can verify the Multisig, before you fund it and we provide all the tools to do so. We do not offer Auto-encrypt and we reject unencrypted addresses. These policies allow our users to operate under the assumption that nobody can be trusted, and still feel confident to do business.

Would you trade 5 minutes for safety from LE? If you are the kind of person who would rather trust a market and just click "buy" then Sourcery isn't the place for you. HOWEVER if you like us, care about the security of your coin, Sourcery is the safest place on the darkweb to do business.

"Trust Nobody, not even us"


Comments


[15 Points] None:

[deleted]


[10 Points] Peaterpiper:

if your market was siezed like hansa was, and proxy ran for an extended amount of time, what would be able to be discovered by LE?


[6 Points] Uhohcorysays:

Feds I tell ya, FEDS!


[6 Points] KnowsAboutShrooms:

I think the idea behind this is great. I like the attitude. I like the community interaction. And I like the intent.

But I take pause with the previous security flaws. Theyre a big deal. I would also like to see multi currency support. Also, are you looking at support for dead drops? I think that its a very underused aspect of the DNM's.


[1 Points] old__school:

I must say, forcing the buyer to pay a 2% fee to the market kind of sucks knowing that few, if any, vendors will adjust their prices to reflect that relative to other markets where buyers don't pay the fee.


[3 Points] ice_cream4breakfast:

How long is the timelock?


[2 Points] MagentaIsALie:

This is great /u/Merlin_Sourcery, but I was wondering can we have a market wallet for the market fee.

At only 4% most could afford to trust you with a small amount simply to ease the burden of transaction fees.

Say I leave $16 in my market wallet, enough for 4 $40 orders. Say I only do 3 orders so $4 is still in there.

I'd rather you rip me off of $4 than I pay that 3 times for the transaction!


[2 Points] JburnaDNM:

I swear this Market is trying to trap big vendors and bust them or this is at least what it seems like to me. The negotiating with big vendors on vendor bonds to get them to vend there, the Security holes and not dipping, and just a bunch of other stuff. To me it screams honeypot.


[2 Points] missalfa:

Still wouldnt use sourcery market :)


[1 Points] None:

[removed]


[1 Points] Inthewirelain:

Sourcery is the safest place on the darkweb to do business.

lol really


[1 Points] Nandy-bear:

I've asked this before but didn't get an answer (not from you, I mean I asked it in a thread, but the convo was too old so was never picked up).

I've never used multi sig so am not knowledgeable in it. If the vendors' wallet addresses are available to see by the purchaser, couldn't LE do a straw purchase, then see the wallet address it's going to ? They would then be able to build a collection of wallet addresses of known vendors and find out who they are ?

Or am I just super wrong about how multi sig works ?