To be honest, I also think AA cannot add anything new to the case or make things more clear. This is not about Bitcoin but a darknet market. It doesn't matter if people used Bitcoins, paypal or ukash. And no one needs to understand the block chain concept in detail to make a fair judgement.
This looks like a very desperate defense. They seem to have no better idea. Kinda disappointing. What's the strategy behind that? Are they trying to confuse the jury with some technology talking? I'd expect more creative moves, but maybe Ross is really fucked. Writing a diary... I still don't get it...
To be honest, I also think AA cannot add anything new to the case or make things more clear. This is not about Bitcoin but a darknet market. It doesn't matter if people used Bitcoins, paypal or ukash. And no one needs to understand the block chain concept in detail to make a fair judgement.
This looks like a very desperate defense. They seem to have no better idea. Kinda disappointing. What's the strategy behind that? Are they trying to confuse the jury with some technology talking? I'd expect more creative moves, but maybe Ross is really fucked. Writing a diary... I still don't get it...