Can we make a rule that requires vendor reviews to have pictures?

I feel like this would cut down on the amount of obvious shilling going on, and I know others feel the same way that I do. Basically "pics or gtfo."

Nobody is interested in a review with no pics, and a review without pics just seems sketchy to me. When asked about pics the majority of users will respond with "pics will be posted soon." Lmao, yeah, okay bro.


Comments


[1 Points] ThePoluninSnowCircus:

it is for pot fyi


[21 Points] diOpAnonMu:

A lot of people can not safely post pictures. A GPS tagged photo with coordinates of an ounce of cocaine in a house could negatively impact the poster.


[13 Points] _PrinterPam_:

a review without pics just seems sketchy to me.

Not really. If a vendor is going to have someone (or themselves) shill for them, pics are easy-peasy. It's what I would do.

When asked about pics the majority of users will respond with "pics will be posted soon." Lmao, yeah, okay bro.

Well, that makes them all the easier to spot then, right?


[7 Points] ForLol_Serious:

I feel like this would cut down on the amount of obvious shilling going on

The mods get kickbacks for allowing shilling so it's never gonna happen.


[4 Points] ireizumi:

sounds like an opsec nightmare. even if tracing photos is avoidable, is it worth risking it to satisfy some stranger on the internet? unless it’s an incentive review, i’d personally say nah.


[4 Points] Adzi123456:

Whats stopping Shills/Vendors posting reviews with pictures tho?


[2 Points] Richard-Kookinski:

Only if they they happen to be doing a line off Bailey Jays cack.


[2 Points] amped242424:

Should we have to post our address, drivers license, and SS # too?


[1 Points] None:

NOOOOOO STEALTH


[1 Points] EternalTurmoil:

We do this for /r/xanaxcartel.