[Vendor Review] ShatterShack - Nucleus Market - Free Sample .15g

DETAILED CHECKBOX
Vendor Name/Marketplace: Nucleus
Product/s reviewed: free sample .15g Top-Shelf BHO nug run
International?: Nope. US Domestic.
Vendor requires FE?: Nope.
Price before shipping: $0
Shipping cost: $5
Customer Service:
[X]+5 Superb: Polite, prompt, ensures satisfaction
[ ]+4 Good: Professional, exhibits customer care
[ ]+3 Satisfactory: Adequate responses, resolved issue
[ ]+2 Marginal: Subpar communication, partial resolution
[ ]+1 Bad: Poor communication, no resolution
[ ]+0 Awful: Abusive responses, no resolution
Product Quality:
[X]+5 Highest purity - highly potent - WOW! Top shit.
[ ]+4 Mostly pure - potent
[ ]+3 Minor cut or impurity - strong
[ ]+2 Cut and/or impure - medium to weak
[ ]+1 Almost entirely cut - very weak
[ ]+0 Possibly bunk - no effect
Processing Speed:
[X]+5 Processed & marked shipped in 24hrs
[ ]+4 Processed & marked shipped in 48 hrs
[ ]+3 Processed & marked shipped in 72 hrs
[ ]+2 Package is late
[ ]+1 Package is very late
[ ]+0 Never received package
Price Value:
[X]+5 Excellent - great value & low cost - This may vary by customer. I am in a non-legal state where people pay 60/g for "shatter" that doesn't shatter and is full of tane.
[ ]+4 Moderate - worthy value & fair cost
[ ]+3 At-market - neither good nor bad
[ ]+2 Below-market - so-so value, high cost
[ ]+1 Exorbitant - low value, excessive cost
[ ]+0 Rip-off - little-to-no value, unjustified cost
Stealth & OpSec: NEXT LEVEL SHIT. Best I have EVER seen for an item like this. LE could have opened it and would have just re-sealed it and sent it on it's way.
[X]+1 Vacuum-sealed
[ ]+1 Mylar/non-porous container
[X]+1 Decoy/misdirection
[X]+1 Low package profile
[X]+1 Good OpSec/PGP
TOTAL: (96%)

Would post pics but it wouldn't make sense for this sample, I got a few chunks and some shatter dust (all of which was recoverable, so no problem). I didn't weight every tiny bit of it, but the larger chunks alone were .15g so I'm sure it's around .2g total.

Originally wasn't going to include a pic, because of the tiny amount and my lackluster photography skills, but here:

http://anony.ws/image/J49z


Comments


[1 Points] None:

lol no pictures


[1 Points] at69:

.