DETAILED CHECKBOX | |
Vendor Name/Marketplace: |
Humboldt Farm/Dream Market |
Product/s reviewed: |
28g Girl Scout Cookie |
International?: |
No |
Vendor requires FE?: |
No |
Price before shipping: |
250.00! |
Shipping cost: |
7! |
Customer Service: | pick one below with an "x" like this: [x] |
[x]+5 |
Superb: Polite, prompt, ensures satisfaction |
[ ]+4 |
Good: Professional, exhibits customer care |
[ ]+3 |
Satisfactory: Adequate responses, resolved issue |
[ ]+2 |
Marginal: Subpar communication, partial resolution |
[ ]+1 |
Bad: Poor communication, no resolution |
[ ]+0 |
Awful: Abusive responses, no resolution |
Product Quality: | pick one below |
[x]+5 |
Highest purity - highly potent |
[ ]+4 |
Mostly pure - potent |
[ ]+3 |
Minor cut or impurity - strong |
[ ]+2 |
Cut and/or impure - medium to weak |
[ ]+1 |
Almost entirely cut - very weak |
[ ]+0 |
Possibly bunk - no effect |
Processing Speed: | pick one below |
[x]+5 |
Processed & marked shipped in 24hrs |
[ ]+4 |
Processed & marked shipped in 48 hrs |
[ ]+3 |
Processed & marked shipped in 72 hrs |
[ ]+2 |
Package is late |
[ ]+1 |
Package is very late |
[ ]+0 |
Never received package |
Price Value: | pick one below |
[x]+5 |
Excellent - great value & low cost |
[ ]+4 |
Moderate - worthy value & fair cost |
[ ]+3 |
At-market - neither good nor bad |
[ ]+2 |
Below-market - so-so value, high cost |
[ ]+1 |
Exorbitant - low value, excessive cost |
[ ]+0 |
Rip-off - little-to-no value, unjustified cost |
Stealth & OpSec: | check all that apply |
[x]+1 |
Vacuum-sealed |
[x]+1 |
Mylar/non-porous container |
[ ]+1 |
Decoy/misdirection |
[x]+1 |
Low package profile |
[x]+1 |
Good OpSec/PGP |
TOTAL: | (100/100) |
Shipping: The shipping time was amazing! It got here in three days total!
Stealth: Same standard OPSEC stealth used from my previous review on Humboldt Farm.
Quality: Customer's extremely satisfied with the product I gave him. I asked him to do a review, but he just said "it's very good.. very tasty and gets me all relaxed.." so I decided to give Humboldt 5/5 on this one. Customer's happy, no complaints.
OPSEC: basic opsec procedure which meets DNM standard.
No picture: package belongs to the customer.
Note: I will be doing this type of review from various of vendors often from my customers. Man.. business is good ;), trust is very hard to earn from certain vendors. Humboldt is da man! Treat him with utmost respect and he will be your lifetime vendor!
No picture: package sent to the customer. I asked if he could take a pix: he got suspicious and I apologized. I explained and he refused; oh well, all is good! he wish to do business w/ me again. Woot. BETTER CALL SAUL! TROLOLOLOL!
HAPPY 420 EVERYONE! 8===========D
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
Also, please consider using an alternative to Reddit - political censorship is unacceptable.