Was just wondering is the tactic LE uses to prove you were expecting a package is you signing for it or why do they even go that route if they can still get you just by knowing that that package is being delivered to your house?
Do CDs only work with LE/"Postman" trying to get you to sign for a package or will they still sometimes just deliver it normally and "get you" for that?
Was just wondering is the tactic LE uses to prove you were expecting a package is you signing for it or why do they even go that route if they can still get you just by knowing that that package is being delivered to your house?
[5 Points] None:
[1 Points] Theeconomist1:
Signing doesn't prove anything other than you are in possession of it. It doesn't prove intent or knowledge of the pack. When we sign for packs it's most always before we know what it is. Possession is usually what a warrant is predicated on and allows them to search. However you take possession is immaterial. Signing, picking up from your box, etc. I think signing just expedites the process for LE. Otherwise they have to sit around until you check your mail.
[1 Points] druggieslut:
CDs Are a crock of shit to get a technicality to get a search warrant if you haven't figured it out by now. Signing doesn't really mean shit. Doesn't mean you expected the pack.
Now, when they CD you and find all those drugs, etc etc etc in your house.....not much plausible deniability.
If if was just the CD package in court, no other evidence. Would be easy to beat that shit. At that point the cops clearly mailed you drugs....hahaha
state/local PD will never "get you" for that. they'd do a normal CD or a 'knock and talk', which is usually enough to incriminate most people. if you're a large scale distributor, federal government might "get you" for that.