MMB Truly canine proof?

I've seen many venders make the claim that their packaging was "canine proof". I decided to do research and find credibility to the claim but it seems the general consensus points to no. Their is no real evidence they are doggy proof. Of course no one can really test the claim since the majority of us don't have drug dogs handy and I'm sure law enforcement will of course lead us to believe they won't fool the dogs. In conclusion I think its quite misleading and irresponsible on the vendors end to make such claims. Has anyone put these bags to the test or have any links to studies about it?


Comments


[3 Points] Nobu7:

So you want to see proper, peer reviewed studies done on the effectiveness of MMB for transporting illegal substances in a way that can stay undetectable to trained sniffer dogs?


[3 Points] up---__down__---up:

!


[3 Points] crazynmoody:

I'm getting down voted by all the ones who make this claim


[1 Points] None:

[deleted]


[1 Points] None:

[removed]


[1 Points] dastampmasta:

Everything ive read points to, if a package is double vacuum, wiped afte reach seal, then impulse mbb sealed annd wiped, it can pass canine detection for up to 2 weeks. A vendor forgetting to wipe the package with alcohol between seals can be the end of you.


[1 Points] my_dnm_account:

I always thought canines are just a visual statement to get sufficient proof to further investigate.

The dog barked twice; that means cocaine is here! Or the dog is hungry, or has to shit, or I don't know; it's a fucking dog.

I never understood how the usage of canine could be sufficient enough to grant permission for deeper investigation. Granted you can train a canine to sniff out contraband, for sure canines have a sense of smell that is like human vision - it's insane! But to use that for sufficient evidence, eh sounds like some Regan bullshit.


[-5 Points] None:

[deleted]