Hello fellow darknet users,
I (the owner of Grams) am in need of your feedback and suggestions.
But first I quickly want to tell you all the Grams Birthday Doodle Contest. We are accepting "doodles" or Google type logo designs for the 1 year anniversary of Grams. The winner will receive 2 Bitcoins and their design will be the Grams' logo for the birthday week.
More info and details on how to submit your design can be found at our sub-reddit /r/grams
InfoDesk revamp.
Now on to why I am really posting. In the past week , since the EVO scam, the Grams' InfoDesk has been an invaluable tool to many of you for finding vendors and checking ratings and reviews from EVO. It worked pretty good for most of you but it can be better. I designed Grams to be a tool for you all. So I need to know how I can make it better. The vendor rating system I am using now doesn't seem to be the best. I am basing it off reviews from the markets, mixed with reviews posted to Grams. It is very complicated and I think it could be simplified. So I am asking you, the users, how do you think vendors should be rated or ranked. I am looking for the simplest way possible.
Here is some things I think would be good to rank them by but I need just one so it is a simple ranking system.
- total orders
- total complete orders
- total reviews
- total good reviews
- ?? something I am not thinking of
So let me know, what should Grams rank vendors by?
New Markets?
In light of alot of markets going down and a lot of new markets coming in. I wanted to ask you which markets should Grams be focusing our attention on to add to search results and infodesk? EVO was one of the markets that worked with Gram's by installing grams API to make it easy for their listings and vendors to be added and updated to the Grams' results. I like to think this is what helped make them the top market for a while. So now we are trying to find the next market/s we want to work closely with to ensure their data is linked well with grams. Please let us know in this post why or why not we should work with some of the new markets.
We are looking for your feedback, so please if you have an opinion post it in this post so that my staff and I know which direction to take to begin improving Grams.
As always stay safe out there,
GramsAdmin
Are you throwing away the "5/5 FE'd will update later" type reviews? That would go a long way towards giving an accurate ranking I would think.
Pick random vendors and have staff manually audit their ranking to see if your algorithms need tweaked.
User selectable filters to remove data from DNMs they aren't interested in. Default filters for 'Big 3 DNM's' 'DNM's older then 6 months' etc.