Ban all "Vendor Reviews" lacking attached imagery

Tired of product reviews without images. Ban them all. Any fucko can type in he got something but ideally only two fuckos can post a picture of the product (vendor+buyer). Currently anyone with half a brain disregards all reviews without a pic. Like cool you got some coke or pills etc but without a pic it's like why fucking bother with a review!?

If you are worried about OPSEC of posting pictures here's some tips:

Strip the EXIF+GPS data

Sure some sites claim to do it for you but it's better to remove it from the equation. Lots of good free software for this.

Don't include identifiable details!

Have a tattoo? Or a hole in your wall? Dent in your desk? Anime poster on your wall in the top left corner?

Don't fucking include it in the picture! Get some blank paper and take your pictures against the background of the paper.

DO NOT USE PAPER YOU HAVE ALREADY PRINTED ON. Some printers may leave identifiable details on the page after PRINTING!

Posting a review with pictures helps everyone. Especially if you do it right. It's good for harm reduction and it's good for the community as a whole.

Edit: well maybe it's not the best idea this is why im not in charge and it's good to have feedback


Comments


[8 Points] HODLLLLLLLLLL:

This again? Who the fuck are you to tell people how to post reviews?

Posting pictures requires more opsec and makes it more dangerous for people for many reasons.

Get off your high horse asshole and be glad to get reviews at all as there seems to be fewer everyday.


[9 Points] spreadhead78:

I'm sure the same fuckwad could just pull an image of the internet as well.


[3 Points] jdustie:

I rather have a review in words. The pics today are so good that even low grade bud looks super good. So the description becomes much more valuable when contemplating a purchase.


[2 Points] _PrinterPam_:

EXIF*


[2 Points] fullthrottle2:

Good lord , sounds like a way to get even fewer reviews then we already do. when i started this game back in the Blackbank and Agora days there would be 3-5 reviews per hour hitting the sub , now were lucky to get 3-5 per day because people are scared of being profiled i do agree that pic's are helpful but don't think that they should be required at all , just my .02


[2 Points] LSDoodleBob:

Who does this guy think he is?


[1 Points] cheapcab:

We're not gonna do that.


[1 Points] Thoughtsofamaniac:

You're a fucking moron or a cop. Some people don't want to post images of drugs they bought on the internet, pull your panties out of your ass and accept it. It's much more effective to build a defense argument in the case of shit hitting the fan that a wall of text associated with a username is just that, a wall of text that may or may not be real. Including a unique picture is a prosecutor wet dream though because it helps to prove possession of the substance in question at some point in time.

Also, are you actually a moron? I suspect so. Because requiring images isn't going to guarantee that a review can't be faked or that there is actually any product. Any dipshit dropout can just use Google image search, or hell, fake a picture with the right ingredients. Any vendor who is shilling themselves can just take pictures of their own product. Hell I could probably use some epsom salts and take pics and convince at least a few idiots that I'm a ketamine kingpin.

Now go away. Be gone. Shoo, shoo.