Where's Etiking?!? - Got busted. Nabbed by feds

https://www.scribd.com/document/353039122/Jeremy-P-Achey-vs-United-States-Government-s-Motion-for-Pretrial-Detention

looks like he's facing 20 years because someone overdosed on his fentanyl, stay fucking careful guys.

I'm looking for more legal documents right now.

Here's an actual article

http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-nws-bethlehem-mailing-drugs-overdose-20170628-story.html

is pdf warning a thing here?

https://www.scribd.com/document/353064513/3-1 https://www.scribd.com/document/353064511/3-main https://www.scribd.com/document/353064512/3-2

i managed to get all the documents from pacer, bullshit that you have to pay for whats supposed to be public info.


Comments


[16 Points] chef234:

Just bought the pacer documents, reading over it before I post it. Trying to find a good host for them, would rather not link it to me using scribd.

From the documents I have right now he's only being charged with distribution of analogues of controlled substances (4-aco-dmt and 6-mapb). Probably waiting to see if they find anyone else overdose on his junk before the manslaughter charge, the reporter seemed pretty adamant about that. Anyways pls help me find a host for these I paid for them might as well release them.


[12 Points] None:

Search document

2 You are on page 2of 10 Download

- 1 - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEREMY P. ACHEY a/k/a “Etiking” : : : MAGISTRATE NO. 17-864-1 GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION The United States of America, by Louis D. Lappen, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Kishan Nair, Assistant United States Attorney, moves for a detention hearing 1 and pretrial detention of the defendant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). Defendant is a danger to the community and is also a flight risk. The government seeks this Order, because no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance as required and/or the safety of other persons and the community. 2

I. THE FACTS In support of this motion, the government makes the following representations and proposed findings of fact: 1

Under the Bail Act, a judicial officer shall hold a detention hearing upon motion of the government in a case, as here, which involves either a crime of violence or a drug crime punishable by imprisonment of ten years or more, or a crime with a maximum potential sentence of life imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(A)-(C), or a crime which involves a serious risk that the defendant will flee. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(A).

2

The government must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that no conditions of release reasonably will assure the defendant’s appearance or prove by clear and convincing evidence that no conditions of release will assure the safety of the community. United States v. Himmler, 797 F.2d 156, 161 (3d Cir. 1986). Case 5:17-mj-00864 Document 3 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 10

- 2 - A. Probable Cause and The Evidence in This Case 1. There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed the crime of distribution of analogues of controlled substances and controlled substances [4-AcO-DMT, an analogue of psilocin, and 6-(2-Aminopropyl) benzofuran Hydrochloride, an analogue of MDMA], both Schedule I controlled substances, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 802(32)(A), 813 and 841; and use of communications facilities in the commission of narcotics offenses, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 843(b), as charged in the criminal complaint filed on June 26, 2017, in the Middle District of Florida, at docket no. 6:17-mj-1512 (see complaint and warrant, hereby incorporated by reference at magistrate docket number 17-864-1, and Attachment A). The defendant is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight absent sufficient rebuttal by the defendant. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). 2. The evidence in this case is strong and will show that beginning on or about February 27, 2017, defendant Jeremy P. Achey distributed analogues of controlled substances and controlled substances in Bethlehem, Northampton County, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to the Middle District of Florida and throughout the United States. The defendant distributed controlled substances, controlled substance analogues, and other substances through the Dark Net, which criminal elements have used to conduct various criminal activities, including illegal drug trafficking, because of the relative secrecy it provides allowing the users to encrypt their communications. The evidence consists, in part, of approximately twenty-five (25) federally court ordered search warrants, physical observations by law enforcement, the defendant’s Mirandized, recorded confession, and seized controlled substances. The defendant continued to deliver chemical substances even after he learned that an Case 5:17-mj-00864 Document 3 Filed 07/05/17 Page 2 of 10

- 3 - overdose death had occurred because of someone ingesting one of the substances he had delivered (see Attachment A). Florida DEA agents continue investigating this overdose death attributable to the substance delivered by the defendant, and an additional 19 overdose deaths that occurred in the 2017 calendar year. The people who died of overdose deaths were all “Dark Net” customers of the defendant. Additionally, DEA-Allentown agents seized physical evidence from the defendant’s Bethlehem residence including 27 different powder and liquid substances that agents submitted to the DEA forensics laboratory for analysis. Agents also seized blotter sheets typically used for LSD (acid). Other documentary evidence included a June 24, 2017 note purportedly left on the porch of the defendant’s residence for United States Postal Service parcel delivery, which stated, “U.S.P.S. OUTBOUND, GO U.S.A.” and also a smiley face emoticon (see attached exhibit B). The Pennsylvania State Police clandestine laboratory team had to secure the residence during the execution of a search warrant at Achey’s Bethlehem residence. B. Maximum Penalties As charged in the criminal complaint, the defendant faces a total maximum sentence of up to twenty-four years imprisonment, and a mandatory minimum 3 years of supervised release up to a lifetime of supervised release. If the defendant is indicted for a violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841, in which death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance, he could be sentenced to a 20-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, and up to a term of life imprisonment. Case 5:17-mj-00864 Document 3 Filed 07/05/17 Page 3 of 10

- 4 - C. Criminal Record Achey has the following recorded adult criminal history: on August 21, 1993, at age 19, the Irvington Police Department (New Jersey) arrested him for charges of loitering, aggravated assault on law enforcement, resisting arrest, escape, and possession of a controlled dangerous substance, analog, schedule 1, II, III. . On August 31, 1993, he pled guilty to loitering and received a sentence of 10 days imprisonment and a $50 fine. According to NCIC, on June 13, 1995, the Franklin County Sheriff’s Department (Tennessee) issued an arrest warrant for Achey involving a burglary investigation. DEA agents determined that although this warrant is still active, it is non-extraditable. The defendant told DEA agents that during the time the warrant issued, he was homeless and living in Tennessee, and he survived by selling items to pawnshops. He said the warrant was a result of law enforcement authorities wanting to question him in a burglary investigation because of the items he had sold to pawnshops. D. Prior History of Failures to Appear and Abide by Court Supervision The defendant is a risk of flight because he may face at least a 20-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. The defendant also has one active, non-extraditable arrest warrant from Tennessee (June 13, 1995) for a burglary investigation. E. Community Ties/Lack of Employment The defendant has community ties in Bethlehem. He has been unemployed for four years, and his only source of income appears to be the distribution of controlled substance analogues trough the Dark Web. In his Mirandized Statement to DEA agents, the defendant admitted to selling these substances through the Dark Web for 5 to 7 years. II. LAW Case 5:17-mj-00864 Document 3 Filed 07/05/17 Page 4 of 10

- 5 - A.

Presumption of Dangerousness and Flight This Court should order detention of the defendant pending trial because he is both a danger to the community and a serious risk of flight. 3 Because the defendant potentially faces a sentence of up to twenty years imprisonment, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C), this Court must presume that the defendant is both a danger to the community and a risk of flight absent sufficient rebuttal by the defendant. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). B.

Family Ties Not Enough to Rebut Presumption The legislative history of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1983 indicates that congress found that community or family ties do not weigh heavily in the risk of flight analysis: [Congress] is aware of growing evidence that the presence of this factor does not necessarily reflect a likelihood of appearance, and has no correlation with the question of the safety of the community …[Congress] does not intend that a court conclude there is no risk of flight on the basis of community ties alone. Sen. Comm. on Judiciary, Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1983, S. Rep. No. 98-225, 98 th Cong., 1st Sess. 24, 25 (1983). III. CONCLUSION Nothing short of 24-hour custody and supervision can ensure the safety of the community. The conditions of release enumerated in the detention statute at Section 3142(c) 3 The government must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that no conditions of release reasonably will assure the defendant’s appearance or prove by clear and convincing evidence that no conditions of release will assure the safety of the community. United States v. Himmler, 797 F.2d 156, 161 (3d Cir. 1986). Case 5:17-mj-00864 Document 3 Filed 07/05/17 Page 5 of 10


[8 Points] 1000990528:

Wasn't this guy also Jeremeysdemo or whatever? A mod on an RC sourcing sub? Seems that community needs to collectively pucker their buttholes.


[6 Points] Immaloner:

20 deaths with this guy? Fent is going to be the death of DNMs. The Feds aren't fucking around.


[5 Points] BigOlBarb087:

Says he spoke to the fiancé on video chat. What a dumb fuck


[3 Points] None:

[deleted]


[2 Points] chef234:

https://www.scribd.com/document/353064513/3-1 https://www.scribd.com/document/353064511/3-main https://www.scribd.com/document/353064512/3-2

those are all the documents so far, has a public defender on retainer. They mentioned coinbase addresses and him always using the same exact return address to his drug testing service (DTO)

/u/weepark


[1 Points] jeinova:

oh snap...


[1 Points] None:

Just as much as we expect vendors to dispose of any personal identifying information, including just names or usernames, buyers should really do the same thing lol.