Ok so you ordered on Hansa, used autoencrypt (I didn't order on Hasa btw), LE has your address. By the time they come knocking your house is clean and electronics are clean.
Won't the same plausible deniability defence work? I.e. ok somebody ordered drugs to my address but it wasn't me?
Or will they have your IP address maybe?
Or will they be able to trace the BTC to your real bank account, if say you bought off LBC using a National Bank Transfer but sent to an intermediate wallet like Electrum before sending to the market?
Sorry, I'm sure the answers are in the threads but for a less than expert person such as myself I'm finding it hard to assimilate all the information and what is and isn't possible.
A while ago the general view seemed to be that you would get busted by LE by a pack getting intercepted and then blockchain analysis may help with the prosecution, but that really without actually finding drugs on you, any conviction would be very unlikely.
That view seems to have changed now (hence all the support for Monero).
They won't chase you down for little orders, nor will they chase Blockchain transactions if for small orders, nor do they have the resources for it. They want to scare the small drug users. They only will hunt down and try bring to prison the big vendors and big buyers.
But LE does what they want. You can only use the law against your local LE, if higher LE really wants you chased down for an ordered gram of something they will get you.